Effects of Refutational Texts and Seductive Pictures on Conceptual Change

Reference

• Abercrombie, S., Hushman, C. J., & Carbonneau, K. J. (2019). The impact of seductive details and signaling on analogical transfer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2014). From covert processes to overt outcomes of refutation text reading: The interplay of science text structure and working memory capacity through eye fixations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 493–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9494-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, F. E. (2011). From Plato to Derrida (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beerenwinkel, A., Parchmann, I., & Gräsel, C. (2011). Conceptual change texts in chemistry teaching: A study on the particle model of matter. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1235–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9257-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, A., Clark, T., Wolstenholme, J., & Clarke, P. (2003). Missing… presumed at random: Cost-analysis of incomplete data. Health Economics, 12(5), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. E. (2010). The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, S. H., Pekrun, R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2012). Climate change, genetically modified foods, airport body scanners: Investigating students’ emotions related to science topics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association, National Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Montfort, D., Perova‐Mello, N., Lutz, B., Berger, A., & Streveler, R. (2018). Framework theory of conceptual change to interpret undergraduate engineering students’ explanations about mechanics of materials concepts. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. F., & Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Effecting changes in cognitive structure among physics students. In L. West & L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 163–187). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Gunstone, R. F. (1982). Cognitive research and the design of science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 17(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528209529242
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, J. R., Sinatra, G. M., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Confidence in prior knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and prior knowledge: Influences on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, R. W., Sinatra, G. M., & Kendeou, P. (2016). Augmenting the refutation text effect with analogies and graphics. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1166334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I. A. N., Mouskounti, T., & Ioannides, C. (2011). Comprehension and learning from refutation and expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.46.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel, A., Bender, L., & Renkl, A. (2019). Are seductive details seductive only when you think they are relevant? An experimental test of the moderating role of perceived relevance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). Cognitive influences of students’ alternative conceptions within a hands-on gene technology module. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• González, F. M., Saux, G., & Burin, D. (2019). The decorative images’ seductive effect in e-learning depends on attentional inhibition. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4577
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting Conceptual Change in Science: A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Instructional Interventions from Reading Education and Science Education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.2307/747886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735600277971
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Educational International.
   Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., Danielson, R. W., Sinatra, G. M., & Graham, J. (2017). Modifying knowledge, emotions, and attitudes regarding genetically modified foods. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1260523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. A. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynd, C. R., McWhorter, J. Y., Phares, V. L., & Suttles, C. W. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 933–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/downloading-ibm-spss-statistics-25
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. G., Thacker, I., & Sinatra, G. M. (2022). Here’s Hoping It’s not Just Text Structure: The Role of Emotions in Knowledge Revision and the Backfire Effect. Discourse Processes, 59(1-2), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1925059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, A. J., & Wiley, J. (2015). Reading an analogy can cause the illusion of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 376–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1026679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2014). The influence of approach and avoidance goals on conceptual change. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 383–405.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51(5-6), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017). Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997–1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lem, S., Baert, K., Ceulemans, E., Onghena, P., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2017). Refutational text and multiple external representations as a method to remediate the misinterpretation of box plots. Educational Psychology (Dorchester-on-Thames), 37(10), 1281–1300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1333574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzner, A., Schnotz, W., & Müller, A. (2013). The role of decorative pictures in learning. Instructional Science, 41, 811–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9256-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 115–135). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Magner, U. I. E., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 29, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Baldi, R., Di Ronco, S., Scrimin, S., Danielson, R. W., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Textual and graphical refutations: Effects on conceptual change learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 14(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001383519102616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Jackson, J. (2005). The case for coherence in scientific explanations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 11(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2001). Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction, 11(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00041-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: Promise and pitfalls. In L. Pytlik Zillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 1–19). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2007). Optimizing learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2009). Learning from animated classroom exemplars: The case for guiding student teachers’ observations with metacognitive prompts. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610903444592
   Google Scholar
• Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92(2), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Holleran, T. A., Long, J. F., & Zeruth, J. A. (2005). Examining the complex roles of motivation and text medium in the persuasion process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<158::AID-SCE40>3.0.CO;2-3
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual—A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87(5), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2005). The effects of seductive augmentation and agent role on learning interest, achievement, and attitude. The Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (2010). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poehnl, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Cognitive load and alternative conceptions in learning genetics: Effects from provoking confusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.687790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Ramazan, O., Danielson, R. W., Rougee, A., Ardasheva, Y., & Austin, B. W. (2023). Effects of classroom and school climate on language minority students’ PISA mathematics self-concept and achievement scores. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00156-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranellucci, J., Muis, K. R., Duffy, M., Wang, X., Sampasivam, L., & Franco, G. M. (2013). To master or perform? Exploring relations between achievement goals and conceptual change learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(Pt 3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Braasch, J. L. G., Buckland, L. A., Graesser, A. C., Hacker, D. J., Seifert, C., diSessa, A., Afflerbach, P., Alexander, P. A., & Andrews, J. J. (2014). Processing inaccurate information. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S., Nebel, S., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2020). The retrieval-enhancing effects of decorative pictures as memory cues in multimedia learning videos and subsequent performance tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1111–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016619705184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., & Kucera, A. C. (2022). Refutation text facilitates learning: A meta-analysis of between-subjects experiments. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 957–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09656-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp.1–18). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., & Johnson, S. (2014). The paradox of seduction by irrelevant details: How irrelevant information helps and hinders self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez-Alvarez, J. (2021). Are 15-year-olds prepared to deal with fake news and misinformation?. PISA in Focus., No. 113. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6ad5395e-en
   Google Scholar
• Sundararajan, N. (2018). Seductive Details: A meta-regression and empirical study [Doctoral dissertation]. http://hdl.handle.net/2376/16327
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., Jeroen, J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangen, J. M., Constable, M. D., Durrant, E., Teeter, C., Beston, B. R., & Kim, J. A. (2011). The role of interest and images in slideware presentations. Computers & Education, 56(3), 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thacker, I., Sinatra, G. M., Muis, K. R., Danielson, R. W., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., & Chevrier, M. (2020). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu000434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. L., & Kirby, L. A. J. (2020). Situational interest helps correct misconceptions: An investigation of conceptual change in university students. Instructional Science, 48(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09509-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G. J., Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., & Winne, P. H. (2016). Identity and epistemic emotions during knowledge revision: A potential account for the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1136507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Mason, L. (2012). Conceptual change induced by instruction: A complex interplay of multiple factors. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 221–246). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2014). Conceptual change from the framework theory side of the fence. Science & Education, 23(7), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9640-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. O. (2016). Exploring the effects of seductive details with the 4-phase model of interest. Learning and Motivation, 55, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Ardasheva, Y., Carbonneau, K., & Liu, Q. (2021). Testing the seductive details effect: Does the format or the amount of seductive details matter? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington State Department of Health. (n.d.). Building confidence and busting myths. https://doh.wa.gov/emergencies/covid-19/vaccine-information/vaccine-facts
   Google Scholar
• Weingartner, K. M., & Masnick, A. M. (2019). Refutation texts: Implying the refutation of a scientific misconception can facilitate knowledge revision. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zengilowski, A., Schuetze, B. A., Nash, B. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2021). A critical review of the refutation text literature: Methodological confounds, theoretical problems, and possible solutions. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1861948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar