Developing Trimmed Mean Test Statistics for Two-Way Fixed-Effects ANOVA Models Under Variance Heterogeneity and Nonnormality

References

• Alexander , R. A. and Govern , D. M. 1994 . A new and simpler approximation and ANOVA under variance heterogeneity . Journal of Educational Statistics , 19 : 91 – 101 .
   Google Scholar
• Algina , J. , Oshima , T. C. and Lin , W.-Y. 1994 . Type I error rates for Welch's test and James's second-order test under nonnormality and inequality of variance when there are two groups . Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics , 19 : 275 – 292 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley , J. V. 1978 . Robustness? . British Journal of Mathematical Statistics and Psychology , 31 : 144 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran , W. G. 1947 . Some consequences when the assumptions for the analysis of variance are not satisfied . Biometrics , 3 : 22 – 38 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington , E. S. 1974 . A new tabulation of statistical procedures used in APA journals . American Psychologist , 29 : 25 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore , P. B. and Woehlke , P. 1988 . Statistical methods employed in American Educational Research Journal, Educational Researcher, and Review of Educational Research from 1978 to 1987 . Educational Researcher , 17 : 19 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , L. D. and Goodwin , W. L. 1985 . Statistical techniques in AERA articles, 1979–1983: The preparation of graduate students to read the educational research literature . Educational Researcher , 14 : 5 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Harwell , M. R. , Rubinstein , E. N. , Hayes , W. S. and Olds , C. C. 1992 . Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research: The one- and two-factor fixed-effects ANOVA cases . Journal of Educational Statistics , 17 : 297 – 313 .
   Google Scholar
• Hill , G. W. 1970 . Algorithm 395: Student's t-distribution . Communications of the ACM , 13 : 619 – 620 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoaglin , D. C. 1985 . “ Summarizing shape numerically: The g-and-h distributions ” . In Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes , Edited by: Hoaglin , D. C. , Mosteller , F. and Tukey , J. W. 461 – 513 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hsiung , T. and Olejnik , S. 1996 . Type I error rates and statistical power for the James second-order test and the univariate F test in two-way fixed effects ANOVA models under heteroscedasticity and/or nonnormality . The Journal of Experimental Education , 65 : 57 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiung , T. , Olejnik , S. and Oshima , T. C. 1994 . A SAS/IML program for applying the James second-order test in two-factor fixed-effect ANOVA models . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 54 : 696 – 698 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James , G. S. 1951 . The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown . Biometrika , 38 : 324 – 329 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen , S. 1980 . The Welch-James approximation to the distribution of the residual sum of squares in a weighted linear regression . Biometrika , 67 : 85 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman , H. J. , Carriere , K. C. and Lix , L. M. 1995 . Robust and powerful nonorthogonal analyses . Psychometrika , 60 : 395 – 418 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman , H. J. , Kowalchuk , R. K. and Lix , L. M. 1998 . Robust nonorthogonal analyses revisited: An update based on trimmed means . Psychometrika , 63 : 145 – 163 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman , H. J. , Lix , L. M. and Kowalchuk , R. K. 1998 . Multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means . Psychological Methods , 3 : 123 – 141 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lix , L. M. and Keselman , H. J. 1998 . To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 58 : 409 – 429 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez , J. and Iglewicz , B. 1984 . Some properties of the Tukey g and h family of distributions . Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods , 13 : 353 – 369 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micceri , T. 1989 . The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures . Psychological Bulletin , 105 : 156 – 166 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan , G. W. , Wong , D. S. and Thompson , P. A. 1987 . Robustness properties of nonorthogonal analysis of variance . Psychological Bulletin , 101 : 464 – 470 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima , T. C. and Algina , J. 1992a . A SAS program for testing the hypothesis of the equal means under heteroscedasticity: James's second order test . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 52 : 117 – 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Oshima , T. C. and Algina , J. 1992b . Type I error rates for James's second-order test and Wilcox's Hm test under heteroscedasticity and non-normality . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 45 : 255 – 263 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan , J. C. and Keselman , H. J. 1977 . Is the ANOVA F-test robust to variance heterogeneity when sample sizes are equal?: An investigation via a coefficient of variation . American Educational Research Journal , 14 : 493 – 498 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger , J. L. and Gasko , M. 1983 . “ Comparing location estimators: Trimmed means, medians, and trimean ” . In Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis , Edited by: Hoaglin , D. , Mosteller , F. and Tukey , J. 297 – 338 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute, Inc. 1989 . SAS Basic Software, Version 6.12 [Computer software] , Cary, NC : Author .
   Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky , S. S. and Blair , R. C. 1992 . A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error probabilities of the t test to departures from population normality . Psychological Bulletin , 111 : 352 – 360 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider , P. J. and Penfield , D. A. 1997 . Alexander and Govern's approximation: Providing an alternative to ANOVA under variance heterogeneity . The Journal of Experimental Education , 65 : 271 – 286 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudte , R. G. and Sheather , S. J. 1990 . Robust estimation and testing , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Tan , W. Y. and Tabatabai , M. A. 1986 . Some Monte Carlo studies on the comparison of several means under heteroscedasticity and robustness with respect to departure from normality . Biometric Journal , 28 : 801 – 814 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey , W. J. and McLaughlin , D. H. 1963 . Less vulnerable confidence and significance procedures for location based on a single sample: Trimming/Winsorization I . Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics: Series A , 25 : 331 – 352 .
   Google Scholar
• Welch , B. L. 1951 . On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach . Biometrika , 38 : 330 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1987 . New designs in analysis of variance . Annual Review of Psychology , 38 : 29 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1989 . Adjusting for unequal variances when comparing means in one-way and two-way fixed effects ANOVA models . Journal of Educational Statistics , 14 : 269 – 278 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1994a . A one-way random effects model for trimmed means . Psychometrika , 59 : 289 – 306 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1994b . Some results on the Tukey-McLaughlin and Yuen methods for trimmed means when distributions are skewed . Biometrical Journal , 36 : 259 – 273 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1995a . ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? . Review of Educational Research , 65 : 51 – 77 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1995b . ANOVA: The practical importance of heteroscedastic methods, using trimmed means versus means, and designing simulation studies . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 48 : 99 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1995c . Three multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means . Biometrical Journal , 37 : 643 – 656 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1996 . Statistics for the social sciences , San Diego, CA : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1997a . A bootstrap modification of the Alexander-Govern ANOVA method, plus comments on comparing trimmed means . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 57 : 655 – 665 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1997b . Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing , San Diego, CA : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1997c . Pairwise comparisons using trimmed means or M-estimators when working with dependent groups . Biometrical Journal , 6 : 677 – 688 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. 1998 . The goals and strategies of robust methods . British Journal of Mathematical and Psychological Statistics , 51 : 1 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. , Charlin , V. and Thompson , K. L. 1986 . New Monte Carlo results on the robustness of the ANOVA F, W, and F* statistics . Communications in Statistics: Simulations and Computations , 15 : 933 – 944 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox , R. R. , Keselman , H. J. and Kowalchuk , R. K. 1998 . Can tests for treatment group equality be improved?: The bootstrap and trimmed means conjecture . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 51 : 123 – 134 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson , V. L. 1980 . Research techniques in AERJ articles: 1969–1978 . Educational Researcher , 9 : 5 – 10 .
   Google Scholar
• Yuen , K. K. 1974 . The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances . Biometrika , 61 : 165 – 170 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar