Conceptual Factors Influence Children's Distributivity Bias

References

• Barner, D., Lui, T., & Zapf, J. (2012). Is two a plural marker in early child language? Developmental Psychology, 48, 10–17. doi:10.1037/a0025283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97, 41–66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Kahn, J. (2009, November). Number sense and number syntax: The magical ***. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, C., Atanassov, D., Schwarz, F., & Trueswell, J. (2012). The collective bias? Using eye movements to examine collective vs. distributive interpretations of plural sets. Poster presented at the 25th CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2015). Availability of alternatives and the processing of scalar implicatures: A visual world eye‐tracking study. Cognitive Science, 40, 172–201. doi:10.1111/cogs.12227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukette, D., & Stiles, J. (1996). Children's analysis of hierarchical patterns: Evidence from a similarity judgment task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 103–140. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukette, D., & Stiles, J. (2001). The effects of stimulus density on children's analysis of hierarchical patterns. Developmental Science, 4, 233–251. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1999). Taking on semantic commitments, II: Collective versus distributive readings. Cognition, 70, 87–104. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59. doi:10.2307/1130388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. B., & Stiles, J. (2009). Hierarchical forms processing in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 222–240. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupp, J. M., & Souther, S. S. (2014). The effect of component meaningfulness on global-local processing in children and adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 614–624. doi:10.1080/15248372.2013.784974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimchi, R., Hadad, B., Behrmann, M., & Palmer, S. E. (2005). Microgenesis and ontogenesis of perceptual organization: Evidence from global and local processing of hierarchical patterns. Psychological Science, 16, 282–290. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01529.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanter, J. A., & Basche, R. A. (2014). Effect of number and similarity on children's plural comprehension. First Language, 34, 519–536. doi:10.1177/0142723714560177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretic approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: De Gruyer.
   Google Scholar
• Link, G. (1987). Generalized quantifiers and plurals. In P. Gärdenfors (Ed.), Generalized Quantifiers (pp. 151–180). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Morrow, L. I. (2004). Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346–364. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D. (2014). The processing of plural expressions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 319–329. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12085
   Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 464–486. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., George, G. E., & Warren, T. (2014). The conceptual representation of number. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1349–1365. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.863372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2011). Building complex reference objects from dual sets. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 443–459. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2015). The mental representation of plural events. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1249–1267. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.976578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzschild, R. (1996). Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Syrett, K., & Musolino, J. (2013). Collectivity, distributivity, and the interpretation of numerical expressions in child and adult language. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 20, 259–291. doi:10.1080/10489223.2013.828060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinter, A., Puspitawati, I., & Witt, A. (2010). Children's spatial analysis of hierarchical patterns: Construction and perception. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1621–1631. doi:10.1037/a0020615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, J. A., & Smith, L. B. (2008). Meaning matters in children's plural productions. Cognition, 108, 466–476. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar