An analysis of Lilienfeld et al.’s (2015) problematic psychological terms

References

• Benjamin, L. T. (1986). Why don’t they understand us? A history of psychology’s public image. American Psychologist, 41(9), 941–946. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blashfield, R. K., & Burgess, D. R. (2014). Classification provides an essential basis for organizing mental disorders. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 93–117). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Castiello, U. (2021). (Re)claiming plants in comparative psychology. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 135(1), 127–141. doi:10.1037/com0000239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cena, H., Barthels, F., Cuzzolaro, M., Bratman, S., Brytek-Matera, A., Dunn, T., … Donini, L. M. (2019). Definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa: A narrative review of the literature. Eating and Weight Disorders : EWD, 24(2), 209–246. doi:10.1007/s40519-018-0606-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleckley, H. M., & Thigpen, C. H. (1995). The dynamics of illusion. American Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 334–342. doi:10.1176/ajp.112.5.334
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, D. A. (1997). On the evolution of divisions. American Psychologist, 57(7), 733–741. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.733
   Google Scholar
• Dua, D., & Singh, S. M. (2019). Schizophrenia: A disorder in search of a new name. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 55–56. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2019.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstein, R. (1950). THE TOWER OF BABEL IN PSYCHOLOGY AND IN PSYCHIATRY (Towards a Theory of Determinants in Psychology). American Imago, 7(2), 77–141. Retrieved October 12, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26301250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flis, I., & van Eck, N. J. (2018). Framing psychology as a discipline (1950–1999): A large-scale term co-occurrence analysis of scientific literature in psychology. History of Psychology, 21(4), 334–362. doi:10.1037/hop0000067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortney, M. (2019). Conceptualizing intellectual attention. Theory & Psychology, 29(6), 775–788. doi:10.1177/0959354319853632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusar-Poli, P., Salazar de Pablo, G., De Micheli, A., Nieman, D. H., Correll, C. U., Kessing, L. V., … van Amelsvoort, T. (2020). What is good mental health? A scoping review. European Neuropsychopharmacology : The Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 33–46. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garavito, D. M. N., Reyna, V. F., & DeTello, J. E. (2018). A concussion by any other name: Differences in willingness to risk brain injury by label and level of participation in high‐school and college sports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 646–654. doi:10.1002/acp.3481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. (2019). Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology’s conception of ‘obedience’. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 241–259. doi:10.1111/bjso.12272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, B., Kõlves, K., & Leo, D. (2019). Contemporary definitions of suicidal behavior: A systematic literature review. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 49(2), 488–504. doi:10.1111/sltb.12457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., & Ye, L. (2019). Freudian slip? The changing cultural fortunes of psychoanalytic concepts. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1489. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques, G. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7(2), 150–182. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibberd, F. J. (2014). The metaphysical basis of a process psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(3), 161–186. doi:10.1037/a0036242
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers, NY: World Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrusheva, O. (2020). The concept of vitality: Review of the vitality-related research domain. New Ideas in Psychology, 56, 100752. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., & O’Donohue, W. T. (Eds.). (2007). The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Sauvigné, K. C., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., Latzman, R. D., & Waldman, I. D. (2015). Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: A list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1100. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, A., Helgesson, G., & Sjöstrand, M. (2019). Towards a palliative care approach in psychiatry: Do we need a new definition? Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(1), 26–30. doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16(4), 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1997). Toward a theoretical psychology: Should a subdiscipline be formally recognized? American Psychologist, 52(2), 117–129. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, M. M. (1992). Origins and early years of the American Psychological Association, 1890–1906. American Psychologist, 47(2), 111–122. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2017). We can do better than fads. In S. O. Lilienfeld & I. D. Waldman (Eds.), Psychological science under scrutiny: Recent challenges and proposed solutions (pp. 340–348). New York: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119095910.ch17
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Kalmar, D. A. (2001). The role of theory in unified psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 21(2), 99–117. doi:10.1037/h0091200
   Google Scholar
• Uher, J. (2021). Psychology’s status as a science: Peculiarities and intrinsic challenges. Moving beyond its current deadlock towards conceptual integration. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 55, 212–224. doi:10.1007/s12124-020-09545-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, H. C., Calkins, M. W., Dunlap, K., Gardiner, H. N., & Ruckmich, C. A. (1918). Report: Definitions and delimitations of psychological terms prepared by a committee of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 15(3), 89–95. doi:10.1037/h0073461
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. L., & Carroll, J. B. (1998). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf: Vol. 24. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (2019). On the definition of APD and the need for a conceptual model of terminology. International Journal of Audiology, 58(8), 516–523. doi:10.1080/14992027.2019.1600057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagaria, A., Andò, A., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 521–562. doi:10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar