Is it time to replace the Big Five personality model? Factorial structure of the NEO PI-R in a community sample of Spanish adults

References

• Aluja, A., Blanch, A., Solé, D., Dolcet, J. M., & Gallart, S. (2008). Validez convergente y estructural del NEO-PI-R. Baremos orientativos [Convergent and structure validity of the NEO PI-R. Orientative norms]. Boletín de Psioclogía, 92, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Aluja, A., García, Ó., García, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the "NEO-PI-R" factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1879–1889. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353. doi:10.1002/per.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152. doi:10.1177/1088868314523838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Form S and form R. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1999). Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual [Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Manual]. Madrid (Spain): TEA.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2009). The five-factor model and the NEO inventories. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 299–322). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195366877.013.0016
   Google Scholar
• Feher, A., & Vernon, P. A. (2021). Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110002. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando, P. J. (2021). Seven decades of factor analysis: From Yela to present day. Psicothema, 33(3), 378–385. doi:10.7334/psicothema2021.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología [Factor analysis as a research technique in psychology]. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236–241. doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., Bates, T. C., & Jang, K. L. (2007). Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the five-factor model as measured by the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1051–1062. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E. (2009). Partial confirmatory factor analysis: Described and illustrated on the NEO–PI–R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 40–47. doi:10.1080/00223890802484126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, A., Ponsoda, V., Muñiz, J., Prieto, G., & Elosua, P. (2016). Revisión del modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España [Review of the model to assess the quality of tests used in Spain]. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 37(3), 192–197.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2004). Censos de población y viviendas 2001. Resultados definitivos [Population and housing census 2001. Definitive results]. http://www.ine.es.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N., & Tremblay, P. F. (2002). The six factor personality questionnaire. In B. de Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 354–372). Göttingen (Germany): Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P. (2021). History, measurement, and conceptual elaboration of the Big‑Five trait taxonomy: The paradigm matures. In O. P. John & R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 35–82). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1001–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556. doi:10.1177/1073191116659134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada [Exploratory item factor analysis: A practical guide revised and updated]. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151–1169. doi:10.5018/analesps.30.3.199361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2022). SOLOMON: a method for splitting a sample into equivalent subsamples in factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2665–2677. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01750-y. 3491822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (2020). The five-factor model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (2th ed., pp. 129–141). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108264822
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 171–188. doi:10.1177/0022022198291009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A, 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland, J.-P. (2002). The cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 7–28). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Romero, E., Villar, P., & López-Romero, L. (2015). Assessing six factors in Spain: Validation of the HEXACO-100 in relation to the five factor model and other conceptually relevant criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, J., & García-Vera, M. P. (2009). Nuevos baremos para la adaptación española del Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R): fiabilidad y datos normativos en voluntarios de la población general [New norms for the Spanish adaptation of the revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI R): Reliability and normative data in volunteers from the general population]. Clínica y Salud, 20(2), 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, J., Gil, F., García-Vera, M. P., & Barrasa, Á. (2008). Needs and cognition/behavior patterns at work and the big five: An assessment of the personality and preference inventory-normative (PAPI-N) from the perspective of the five-factor model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), 46–58. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, J., Silva, F., & Avia, M. D. (1999). La evaluación de la personalidad desde el modelo de los “Cinco Grandes”: el Inventario de Cinco Factores NEO de Costa y McCrae [Personality assessment from Big Five model: The NEO five-factor inventory of Costa & McCrae]. In F. Silva (Ed.), Avances en evaluación psicológica [Advances in psychological assessment] (pp. 171–234). Valencia (Spain): Promolibro.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a big six structure. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1577–1614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00593.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar