Combining Geography, Math, and Science to Teach Climate Change and Sea Level Rise

References

• Anderson, E. L., and D. Kim. 2006. Increasing the Success of Minority Students in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. 2012. Advancing STEM education with GIS. Redlands, California: Esri.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., and S. W. Bednarz. 2003. Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education. Journal of Geography 102 (6): 231–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battersby, S. E., R. G. Golledge, and M. J. Marsh. 2006. Incidental learning of geospatial concepts across grade levels: Map overlay. Journal of Geography 105 (4): 139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubin, D. E., and E. L. Babco. 2003. Walking the Talk in Retention-to-Graduation: Institutional Production of Minority Engineers—A NACME Analysis. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. www.cpst.org/WalktheTalk.pdf (accessed November 1, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Chubin, D. E., G. S. May, and E. L. Babco. 2005. Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clewell, B. C., and P. B. Campbell. 2002. Taking stock: Where we've been, where we are, where we're going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8 (3–4): 225–284.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Central. 2016. Surging seas risk finder. http://riskfinder.climatecentral.org/?gclid=CKfjnJqX0dICFQcaaQodZnMHKw (accessed November 1, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Culotta, E. 1992. Scientists of the future: Jumping high hurdles. Science 258 (5090): 1209–1213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorn, R. I., J. Douglass, G. O. Ekiss, B. Trapido-Lurie, M. Comeaux, R. Mings, R. Eden, C. Davis, E. Hinde, and B. Ramakrishna. 2005. Learning geography promotes learning math: Results and implications of Arizona's Geomath grade K–8 program. Journal of Geography 104 (4): 151–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. A., C. Strenta, R. Adair, M. Matier, and J. Scott. 1996. The role of ethnicity in choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education 37 (6): 681–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlhar, A. M., and S. K. Duffield. Deconstruction geography: A STEM approach. Middle School Journal 46 (3): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Georges, A. 1999. Keeping what we've got: Effective strategies for retaining minority freshmen in engineering. NACME Research Letter 9 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gewin, V. 2004. Mapping opportunities. Nature 427 (6972): 376–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gold, A. U., D. J. Oonk, L. Smith, M. T. Boykoff, B. Osnes, and S. B. Sullivan. 2015. Lens on climate change: Making climate meaningful through student-produced videos. Journal of Geography 114 (6): 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., and D. G. Janelle. 2010. Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal 75 (1): 3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Google. 2016. https://www.google.com/earth/ (accessed November 1, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, M. E., and S. Grubbs. 2015. Beyond science and math: Integrating geography education. Technology and Engineering Teacher 74 (4): 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., J. Dickerson, D. Batts, P. Kauffmann, and M. Bosse. 2011. Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields? Journal of Technology Education 23 (1): 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hinde, E. R. 2011. Linking geography to reading and English language learners' achievement in US elementary and middle school classrooms. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 20 (1): 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T. 2016. Spatial thinking in geographic information science: Students' geospatial conceptions, map-based reasoning, and spatial visualization ability. Annals of the Association of American Geographer 106 (1): 76–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, I., and S. W. Bednarz. 2014. Dispositions toward teaching spatial thinking through geography: Conceptualization and an exemplar assessment. Journal of Geography 113 (5): 198–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and R. Bednarz. 2009. Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (2): 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, M., R. Golledge, and S. E. Battersby. 2007. Geospatial concept understanding and recognition in G6-college students: A preliminary argument for minimal GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97 (4): 696–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C., and L. E. Williams. 1993. Minority engineering programs: A case for institutional support. NACME Research Newsletter 4 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 2014. Geographies crosscutting themes: Golden anniversary reflections on the 4 traditions of geography. Journal of Geography 113 (5): 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2006. Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System for K–12 Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. Successful K–12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S. 2013. Seeing Relationships: Using spatial thinking to teach science, mathematics and social studies. American Educator Spring: 26–31, 40.
   Google Scholar
• Oyana, T. J., S. Garcia, T. Hawthorne, J. A. Haegele, J. Morgan, and N. Young. 2015. Nurturing diversity in STEM fields through geography: The past, present, and future. Journal of STEM Education 16 (2): 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 2006. Mind and Its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Interpretation. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, W. D. 1964. The four traditions of geography. Journal of Geography 63 (5): 211–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnell, K. N., and R. T. Solman. 1991. The influence of technical illustrations on students' comprehension of geography. Reading Research Quarterly 26 (3): 277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinton, D. S. 2009. Roles for GIS in higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (1): S7–S16.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, L. C. 2010. Using web based GIS in introductory human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 34 (3): 401–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieff, M., and D. Uttal. 2015. How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review 27 (4): 607–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor, L. K., and J. A. Harrington. 2014. Lessons learned from professional development workshops on using GIS geography and history in the K–12 classroom. The Geography Teacher 11 (2): 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. 2007. Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. The Journal of Negro Education 76 (4): 555–581.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2000. Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. NCES Publication No. 2000–601. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. A student's guide to global climate change. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/kids/ (accessed November 1, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. News/Raytheon STEM Index. 2016. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/the-new-stem-index-2016 (accessed November 1, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., and C. A. Cohen. 2012. Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation 57 (4): 148–178.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow. 2009. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (4): 817–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, P. 2004. People and the Planet: Lessons for a Sustainable Future. Washington, D.C.: Population Connection.
   Google Scholar