Students’ Conceptions of and Feelings About Land Use: Building a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning About Land Use

References

• Alerby, E. 2000. A way of visualizing children’s and young people’s thoughts about the environment: a study of drawings. Environmental Education Research 6 (3):205–222. doi: 10.1080/13504620050076713.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., and B. Moss. 1993. How wetland habitats are perceived by children: consequences for children’s education and wetland conservation. International Journal of Science Education 15 (5):473–485. doi: 10.1080/0950069930150502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraza, L. 1999. Children’s drawings about the environment. Environmental Education Research 5 (1):49–67. doi: 10.1080/1350462990050103.
   Google Scholar
• Bereitschaft, B. 2016. Gods of the city? Reflecting on city building games as an early introduction to urban systems. Journal of Geography 115 (2):51–60. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2015.1070366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A. M. 2011. The implementation of a geospatial information technology (GIT)-supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (3):281–300. doi: 10.1002/tea.20409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A. M., and L. Cirucci. 2009. Integrating geospatial technologies to examine urban land use change: A design partnership. Journal of Geography 108 (4–5):186–197. doi: 10.1080/00221340903344920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M., and J. Williams. 1998. Environmental education and primary children’s attitudes towards nature and the environment. Cambridge Journal of Education 28 (2):159–174. doi: 10.1080/0305764980280202.
   Google Scholar
• Cawley, R. 1993. Multiple use-multiple frustration. In Federal land, Western anger. ed. R. Cawley, 34–70. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, T., and K. Daniels. 2003. The environmental planning handbook for sustainable communities and regions. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Des Jardins, J. R. 1993. Environmental ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., J. Leach, R. Millar, and P. Scott. 1996. Young people’s images of science. Buckingham. England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., A. Squires, R. Rushworth, and V. Wood-Robinson. 1994. Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and W. R. Catton. Jr. 1994. Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist 25 (1):5–30. doi: 10.1007/BF02691936.
   Google Scholar
• Ecological Society of America. 2000. Ecological principles for managing land use. Washington, DC: The ESA's Committee on Land Use.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 1986. Qualitative methods in research teaching. In Handbook of research on teaching. ed. M. C. Wittrock, 119–161. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., and R. Duit. 1995. Learning science meaningfully: constructing conceptual models. In Learning science in the schools: Researching reforming practice. ed. S. M. Glynn and R. Duit, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heffron, S. G. and R. M. Downs, eds. 2012. Geography for life: National geography standards. second edition. Washington D C: National Council for Geographic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., and J. F. Gubrium. 1994. Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In Handbook of qualitative research. ed. N. K. Denzin and, Y. S. Lincoln, 262–272. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., C. Jewitt, J. Ogborn, and C. Tsatsarelis. 2001. Multimodal teaching and learning: the rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. 1949. A sand county almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Littledyke, M. 2004. Primary children’s views on science and environmental issues: Examples of environmental cognitive and moral development. Environmental Education Research 10 (2):217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Information and Education Network [LGIEN]. 2001. Illinois county officials: Land use issues and concerns. Illinois: University of Illinois Extension Services.
   Google Scholar
• Loughland, T., A. Reid, and P. Petocz. 2002. Young people’s conceptions of environment: a phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research 8 (2):187–97. doi: 10.1080/13504620220128248.
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. 2005. Last child in the woods: Saving our children from Nature-Deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Manduca, C., D. Mogk, and N. Stillings. 2002. Bringing Research on Learning to the Geosciences. Report from a Workshop Sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Johnson Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, J. 2002. Children's understandings of rurality: exploring the interrelationship between experience and understanding. Journal of Rural Studies 18 (2):193–207. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00043-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsung, K., and S. Jungyeop. 2016. The Pedagogical Benefits of SimCity in Urban Geography Education. Journal of Geography 115 (2):39–50. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2015.1061585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2001. Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, R., and P. Freyberg. 1987. Children’s science. In Learning in science: the implications of children’s science. ed. R. Osborne & P. Freyberg, 5–14. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, L., and J. Harbor. 2005. Using assessment to evaluate and improve inquiry-based geoenvironmental science activities: Case study of a middle school watershed E. coli investigation. Journal of Geoscience Education 53 (2):204–14. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-53.2.204.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, P. 1998. conceptions of nature. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 14 (1):19–26. Children’s doi: 10.1017/S0814062600003918.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., and T. Jarvis. 1995. Children’s choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education 25 (3):239–252. doi: 10.1007/BF02357399.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. 2001. Learners and learning in environmental education: a critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research 7 (3):207–320. doi: 10.1080/13504620120065230.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schollum, B., and R. Osborne. 1987. Relating the new to the familiar. In Learning in science: the implications of children’s science. ed. R. Osborne & P. Freyberg, 51–65. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. 1994. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Handbook of qualitative research. ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 118–137. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., B. Wee, M. Priddy, and J. Harbor. 2007. Students' mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (2):327–48. doi: 10.1002/tea.20161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, D. A. 1994. Urban children’s preferences for nature: lessons for environmental education. Children’s Environments 11 (3):194–203.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. 2005. Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., M. McKenzie, and K. McCoy. 2014. Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research 20 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.877708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture-ERS. 2017. A Primer on Land Use in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2017/december/a-primer-on-land-use-in-the-united-states.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture-NRCS. 2017. National resources inventory: 2012 annual data. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Services.
   Google Scholar
• United States Geological Survey. 2006. Rates, trends, causes, and consequences of urban Land-Use change in the United States. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, C. H., L. A. Hanson, and C. N. Argueta. 2017. Federal land ownership: Overview and data. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., and W. Brewer. 1992. Mental models of the Earth. Cognitive Psychology 24 (4):535–85. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1991. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wee, B. S. 2007. Realizing the child’s perspective: an exploration of Sixth-Graders’ ideas about land use. PhD diss. Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• White, R., and R. Gunstone. 1992. Probing understanding. London, England: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar