705
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Use of Causal Diagrams to Foster Systems Thinking in Geography Education: Results of an Intervention Study

, &
Pages 238-251 | Received 14 Jan 2018, Accepted 12 Apr 2019, Published online: 19 Jun 2019

References

  • Arnold, R. D., and J. P. Wade. 2015. A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science 44:669–78.
  • Assaraf, O. B.-Z., and N. Orion. 2005. Development of system thinking skills in the context of Earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (5):518–60. doi: 10.1002/tea.20061.
  • Assaraf, O. B.-Z., and N. Orion. 2010. Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (10):1253–80.
  • Bala, B. K., F. M. Arshad, and K. M. Noh. 2017. System dynamics. Modelling and simulation. Signapore: Springer Nature.
  • Cox, M., A. Steegen, and J. Elen. 2018. Using causal diagrams to foster systems thinking in geography. International Journal of Designs for Learning 9 (1):34–48.
  • Cox, M., J. Elen, and A. Steegen. 2017. Systems thinking in geography: Can high school students do it? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 28 (1):37–52. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2017.1386413.
  • Cox, M., J. Elen, and A. Steegen. 2018. A test to measure students’ systems thinking abilities in geography. European Journal of Geography 9 (1):105–20.
  • Favier, T. T. 2017. Towards a theoretical framework for geographic relational thinking. Paper presented at the CGE Lisbon Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, October 26.
  • Favier, T. T., and J. A. van der Schee. 2014. The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students’ relational thinking. Computers and Education 76:225–36.
  • Fögele, J. 2017. Acquiring powerful thinking through geographical key concepts. In The power of geographical thinking, ed. C. Brooks, G. Butt, and M. Fargher, 59–73. London: Springer International Publishing.
  • Friends of the Earth Europe, Arc2020, Ceo, Concord, European Environmental Bureau, Food and Water Watch Europe, Ifoam Eu, Pesticide Action Network Europe, European Coordination Via Campesina, Act Alliance. 2012. Conference on crop rotation and legume cultivation. Accessed January 14, 2018. http://www.foeeurope.org/europe-increase-crop-rotation-legume-cultivation.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., R. Jordan, C. Eberbach, and S. Sinha. 2017. Systems learning with a conceptual representation: A quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science 45 (1):53–72.
  • Hoffmann, T. 2013. Globale Herausforderungen-ein Mysterium? [Global challenges- a mystery?]. Praxis Geographie, 43 (9):36–43.
  • International Geographical Union. 2016. International charter on geographical education. Accessed January 14, 2018. http://www.igu-cge.org/charters-pdf/2016/igu_2016_def.pdf.
  • Jackson, P. A. 2006. Thinking geographically. Geography 91 (3):199–204.
  • Kali, Y., N. Orion, and B. S. Eylon. 2003. Effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perception of the earth’s crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (6):545–65.
  • Karkdijk, J., J. van der Schee, and W. Admiraal. 2013. Effects of teaching with mysteries on students’ geographical thinking skills. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 22 (3):183–90.
  • Katholiek Onderwijs Vlaanderen. 2017. Curriculum goals secondary education: Geography 11th and 12th grade. Accessed January 14, 2018. http://ond.vvkso-ict.com/leerplannen/doc/aardrijkskunde-2017-010.pdf.
  • Lambert, D. 2011. Reviewing the case for geography, and the “knowledge turn” in the English national curriculum. Curriculum Journal 22 (2):243–64.
  • Lambert, D. 2017. Chapter 2: Thinking geographically. In The handbook of secondary geography, ed. M. Jones, 20–29, 1st ed. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
  • Lambert, D., and J. Morgan. 2010. Teaching geography 11-18: A conceptual approach. Maidenhead: Mcgraw-Hill Education.
  • Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1):159–74.
  • Maude, A. 2017. Applying the concept of powerful knowledge to school geography. In The power of geographical thinking, ed. C. Brooks, G. Butt, and M. Fargher, 27–40. London: Springer International Publishing.
  • Mehren, R., A. Rempfler, and E. M. Ullrich-Riedhammer. 2015. Diagnosis of system competence through concept maps. Malaria control in the Congo as an example. Praxis Geographie 7–8:29–33.
  • Mehren, R., A. Rempfler, J. Buchholz, J. Hartig, and E. M. Ulrich-Riedhammer. 2018. System competence modeling: Theoretical foundation and empirical validation of a model involving natural, social, and human-environment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (5):685–711.
  • Novak, J. D., and A. J. Cañas. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Accessed March 29, 2019. https://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps.
  • Öllinger, M., S. Hammon, M. VON Grundherr, and J. Funke. 2015. Does visualization enhance complex problem solving? The effect of causal mapping on performance in the computer-based microworld Tailorshop. Educational Technology Research and Development 63 (4):621–37.
  • Pala, Ö., and J. A. M. Vennix. 2005. Effect of system dynamics education on systems thinking inventory task performance. System Dynamics Review 21 (2):147–72.
  • Rates, C. A., B. K. Mulvey, and D. F. Feldon. 2016. Promoting conceptual change for complex systems understanding: Outcomes of an agent-based participatory simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (4):610–27.
  • Rempfler, A., and R. Uphues. 2012. system competence in geography education development of competence models, diagnosing pupils’ achievement. European Journal of Geography 3 (1):6–22.
  • Riess, W., and C. Mischo. 2010. Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education 32 (6):705–25.
  • Senge, P., N. H. Cambron-Mccabe, T. Lucas, B. Smith, J. Dutton, and A. R. T. Kleiner. 2000. Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents and everyone who cares about education, ed. P. Senge. New York: Doubleday.
  • Smetana, L. K., and R. L. Bell. 2012. Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education 34 (9):1337–70.
  • Stave, K., and M. Hopper. 2007. What constitutes systems thinking? A proposed taxonomy. Paper presented at the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Boston, July 29–August 3, 2007.
  • Stoel, G. L., J. P. van Drie, and C. A. M. van Boxtel. 2015. Teaching towards historical expertise. Developing a pedagogy for fostering causal reasoning in history. Journal of Curriculum Studies 47 (1):49–76.
  • Stoel, G. L., J. P. van Drie, and C. A. M. van Boxtel. 2017. The effects of explicit teaching of strategies, second-order concepts, and epistemological underpinnings on students’ ability to reason causally in history. Journal of Educational Psychology 109 (3):321–37.
  • Sweeney, L. B., and J. Sterman. 2000. Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review 16 (4):249–86.
  • Wehry, S., H. Monroe-Ossi, S. Cobb, and C. Fountain. 2012. Concept mapping strategies: Content, tools and assessment for human geography. Journal of Geography 111 (3):83–92.
  • Yoon, S. A., and C. Hmelo-Silver. 2017. Introduction to special issue: Models and tools for systems learning and instruction. Instructional Science 45 (1):1–4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.