Geography Outdoor Education from the Perspective of Czech Teachers, Pupils and Parents

References

• Anderson, D., K. B. Lucas, I. S. Ginns, and L. D. Dierking. 2000. Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post‐visit activities. Science Education 84 (5):658–79. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<658::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beames, S., and H. Ross. 2010. Journeys outside the classroom. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 10 (2):95–109. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2010.505708.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S., S. Heffron, and N. Huynh. 2013. A road map for 21st century geography education: Geography education research. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M., D. Lambert, and D. Balderstone. 2015. Learning to teach geography in the secondary school. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, D. J. 1974. Objectives and constraints in geographical fieldwork. Journal of Curriculum Studies 6 (2):158–66. doi: 10.1080/0022027740060207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 1960. The process of education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Činčera, J., and J. Holec. 2016. Outdoor education in formal education. Envigogika 11 (2).
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., and M. Storksdieck. 2008. A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies 11 (2):181–97. doi: 10.1080/10645570802355562.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., M. Rickinson, K. Teamey, M. Morris, M. Y. Choi, D. Sanders, and P. Benefield. 2006. The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review 87 (320):107–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák, D. 2012. Od osnov ke standardům: proměny kurikulární teorie a praxe [from prescribed curriculum to standards: The transformation of curricular theory and practice]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická fakulta.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. 2012. Influences on and obstacles to K-12 administrators’ support for environment-based education. The Journal of Environmental Education 43 (2):73–92. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2011.602759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, P. 1986. Outdoor education: Definition and philosophy. Pullman., Washington: Chair of Physical Education, Sport, and Leisure Studies. Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Framework Educational Program. 2016. MEYS. Accessed February 2, 2016. http://www.nuv.cz/uploads/RVP_ZV_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, G. R. H., and D. D. Cohen. 2018. Temporal trends in muscular fitness of English 10-year-olds 1998–2014: An allometric approach. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 22(2):201–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, L. F., and N. Foskett. 2007. Objectives and constraints in geographical fieldwork: Teachers’ attitudes and perspectives in senior high schools in Taiwan. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 16 (1):5–20. doi: 10.2167/irg203.0.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E., et al. 2003. Integrované terénní vyučování [Integrated fieldwork]. Brno: Paido.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E., and P. Korvas. 2008. Terénní výuka s pohybovými aktivitami [Fieldwork with Kinetic Activities]. Geographia Cassoviensis 1 (47):47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, S. 2012. Outdoor adventure education in a formal education curriculum in Finland: Action research application: Action research application. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 12 (1):41–62. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2011.569186.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, S., and J. Roger. 2015. Evaluation of learning away: Final report. Accessed May 22, 2018. http://learningaway.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/LA-Final-Report-May-2015-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M., D. D. Gilbertson, and Ch. O. Hunt. 1997. Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 21 (3):313–32. doi: 10.1080/03098269708725439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 (2):75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, D. 2000. Memorable experiences of a science field trip. School Science and Mathematics 100 (2):65–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17238.x.
   Google Scholar
• Krakowka, A. R. 2012. Field trips as valuable learning experiences in geography courses. Journal of Geography 111 (6):236–44. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2012.707674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., and D. Balderstone. 2010. Learning to teach geography in the secondary school. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., and M. J. Reis. 2014. The place of fieldwork in geography and science qualifications. 1st ed. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Madarasová-Gecková, A., Z. Dankulincová, D. Sigmundová, and M. Kalman. 2016. Mezinárodní zpráva o zdraví a životním stylu dětí a školáků [Internationaational report on the health and lifestyle of children and pupils]. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. http://hbsc.upol.cz/download/nar-zprava-v4-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. E., R. W. Fortner, and G. W. Mullins. 1997. Model of affective learning for nonformal science education facilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (8):805–18. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199710)34:8<805::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mygind, E. 2009. A comparison of childrens’ statements about social relations and teaching in the classroom and in the outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 9 (2):151–69. doi: 10.1080/14729670902860809.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, J. 2013. Osobnostní rozvoj prostřednictvím učení a výchovy v přírodě [Personality development via teaching and upbringing in nature]. ACORát 2 (1):47–67. http://www.acor.cz/getattachment/Studovny/ACORat---archiv/1-2013/6_Neuman.pdf.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Oost, K., B. De Vries, and J. A. Van der Schee. 2011. Enquiry-driven fieldwork as a rich and powerful teaching strategy – school practices in secondary geography education in the Netherlands. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 20 (4):309–25. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2011.619808.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, E., and E. K. Teather. 2002. Geographical Expeditions: Assessing the benefits of a student-driven fieldwork method. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 26 (3):275–89. doi: 10.1080/0309826022000019864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., J. Dillon, K. Teamey, M. Morris, Ch. M. Young, D. Sanders, and P. Benefield. 2004. A review of research outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research: King´s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, W. S. 2007. The influence of forest view through a window on job satisfaction and job stress. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22 (3):248–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 1999. Changing fieldwork objectives and constraints in secondary schools in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 8 (2) :181–9. doi: 10.1080/10382049908667607.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltman, J. P., J. Lidstone, and G. Kidman. 2017. The 2016 International Charter on geographical education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 26 (1):1–2. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2017.1272849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svobodová, H., D. Mísařová, and E. Hofmann. 2016. Analýza školních vzdělávacích programů ve vztahu k terénní výuce [Analysis of the school education programs in relation to outdoor education]. In Sborník příspěvků Výroční konference České geografické společnosti Geografické myšlení jako aktuální společenská výzva, A. Nováček, 292–302. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích.
   Google Scholar
• Svobodová, H., D. Mísařová, R. Durna, T. Češková, and E. Hofmann. 2019. Koncepce terénní výuky pro základní školy [The Concept of Outdoor Education for Elementary School]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. doi: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-9246-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Trávníček, M., H. Svobodová, and R. Durna. 2018. Assessment of pupils’ physical activity during diverse types of teaching lessons. Studia Sportiva 12 (1):141–8. doi: 10.5817/StS2018-1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, S. 2009. Outdoor learning for children aged 2–11: Perceived barriers, potential solutions. Fourth International Outdoor Education Research Conference, 15–18. Beechworth, Victoria, Australia: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar