No Laughing Matter

References

• Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 3, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, M. (1986). How many feminists does it take to make a joke? Sexist humour and what's wrong with it. Hypatia, 1(1), 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. (1994, January 13). Guilty if charged. The New York Review, pp. 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brodzinsky, D. M., Barnett, K., and Aiello, J. R. (1981). Sex of subject and gender identity as factors in humour appreciation. Sex Roles, 7, 561–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway, R. (1990). Satire and humour in education: Selected readings. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. L. (1989). Changes in humour appreciation of college students in the last twenty-five years. Psychological Reports, 65, 863–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. J., and Gadfield, N. J. (1976). Is sexual humour sexist? Journal of Communication, 26(3), 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coser, R. L. (1960). Laughter among colleagues. Psychiatry, 23, 81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimmer, S. A., Carroll, J. L., and Wyatt, G. K. (1990). Uses of humour in psychotherapy. Psychological Reports, 66, 795–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundes, A. (1987). Cracking jokes: Studies of sick humor cycles and stereotypes. Berkeley, CA: 10 Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, J. P. (1969). Negotiating the serious import of humour. Sociometry, 32, 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, L. (1978). Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: Warner.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. (1976, Summer). Obscene joking across cultures. Journal of Communication, 26(3), 134–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1963 [1905]). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Hartogs, R., and Fantel, H. (1967). Four-letter word games: The psychology of obscenity. New York: M. Evans Company.
   Google Scholar
• Henkin, B., and Fish, J. M. (1986). Gender and personality differences in the appreciation of cartoon humour. Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. A. (1990). The “only joking” defense: Attribution bias or impression management? Psychological Reports, 67, 1051–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (1984, October). The new stand-up comics: Can you be a funny woman without making fun of women? Ms., 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Layng, A. (1991). Sexism and classroom humour. College Teacher, 39, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Love, A. M., and Deckers, L. H. (1989). Humour appreciation as a function of sexual, aggressive, and sexist content. Sex Roles, 20(11/12) 649–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, M. (1990). Who is laughing now? The role of humour in the social construction of gender. Atlantis, 15, 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, F. A., and Thompson, M. K. (1994). The feminist classroom: An inside look at how professors and students are transforming higher education for a diverse society. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humour: Its origin and development. San Francisco: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. E., Griffiths, K., and Payne, B. (1987). Gender attitudes toward women and the appreciation of sexist humour. Sex Roles, 76(9/10), 521–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. (1988) On humour: Its nature and its place in modern society. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, D., Maple, S. A., and Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paludi, M. A. (1990). Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humour. Boston, Massachusetts: D. Reidel Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, T. J. (1979). Catharsis in healing, ritual, and drama. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sev'er, A. (1991). Women and dominance in small groups: A social roles assessment. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 6(3), 265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sev'er, A. (1990). Joint effects of race and confidence on perceptions and influence: Implications for blacks in decision making positions. Canadian Ethnic Relations, 21(3), 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Smeltzer, L. R., and Leap, T. L. (1988). An analysis of individual reactions to potentially offensive jokes in work settings. Human Relations, 41, 295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1974). Women's perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G., Morrison, D. E., and Wolf, L. E. (1994). College as a gendered experience: An empirical analysis using multiple lenses. Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 696–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J. G. (1986). Marriage humour and its social functions, 1900–1939. Atlantis, 11(2), 70–85.
   Google Scholar
• Statham, A., Richardson, L., and Cook, J. A. (1991). Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, J. A. (1990). Is propensity to laugh equivalent to sense of humour? Psychological Reports, 66, 737–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, S. (1984). Self-mockery: An alternate form of self-presentation. Symbolic Interaction, 7(1), 121–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitulli, W. F., and Barbin, J. M. (1991). Humour-value assessment as a function of sex, age, and education. Psychological Reports, 69, 1155–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, N. (1981). Do feminists ever laugh? Women's rights and women's humour. International Journal of Women's Studies, 4, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. P. (1979). Jokes: Form, content, use and function. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wischnewski, M. M. (1989). Making sense of humour, gender, and power: Implications for adult learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Zijderveld, A. C. (1983). The sociology of humour and laughter. Current Sociology, 31, 1–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv, A. (1984). Personality and sense of humour. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar