Consequences of Radical Change in Governance: A Grounded Theory Approach

References

• Astin, H., & Leland, C. (1991). Women of influence and women of vision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (1996). Renewing the academic presidency: Stronger leadership for tougher times. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baldridge, J. (1971). Power and conflict in the university. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Baldridge, J. V. (1983). Rules for a Machiavellian change agent: Transforming the entrenched professional organization. In J. V. Baldridge & T. Deal (Eds.), The dynamics of organizational change in education (pp. 18–32). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R., & Carroll, S. (1998). The implications of the changes environment for governance in higher education. In W. Tierney (Ed.), The responsive university, (pp. 92–119). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E., & Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning collegiate leadership. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1991). The latent organizational functions of the academic senate: Why senates do not work but will not go away. In M. W. Peterson, E. E. Chaffee, & T. H. White (Eds.), Organization and academic governance in higher education (4th ed., pp. 195–207). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Braganza, A. (2001). Radical process change. A best practice blueprint. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, P. L., & Worth, R. (1997). The four levers of corporate change. New York: American Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, G. & Peppard, J. (1995). Examining business process re-engineering: Current perspectives and research directions. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Carnall, C. A. (1995). Managing change in organizations (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. (1995). Best practices in re-engineering: What works and what doesn't in the reengineering process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D., Hard, K., & Trahant, W. (1996). Managing the change process: A field book for change agents, consultants, team leaders, and reengineering managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, E. (1984). Successful strategic management in small private colleges. Journal of Higher Education, 55(2), 212–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). The five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, J., & Newson, J. (Eds.) (1998). Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimond, J. (1991). Faculty participation in institutional budgeting. In R. Birnbaum (Ed), Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision-making (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 75, pp. 63–78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, G. (1983). Shaping an academic strategy. In G. Keller (Ed.), Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education (pp. 1–17). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg Foundation. (2002) Transforming leadership. College Park, MD: MacGregor Burns Leadership Academy, University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st Century: Recent research and conceptualizations. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002a). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, inter-related strategies and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 295–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002b). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education 73(4), 435–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, D., & Willmott, H. (2000). The re-engineering revolution?: Critical studies of corporate change. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. (1991). Campus leaders and campus senates. In R. Birnbaum (Ed), Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision-making (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 75, pp. 41–62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. (1994). American higher education: A history. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, K., & McConnell, T. (1979). Sharing authority effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, D. (1998). Champions of change: How CEOs and their companies are mastering the skills of radical change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, G. L., Baldridge, J. V. (Eds.) (1977). Governing academic organizations: New problems, new perspectives. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 140 447)
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, J., Smith, D., Corak, K., & Yamada, M. (1994). Strategic academic governance: How to make big decisions better. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S. A. (1998). Federal policy and supply-side institutional resource allocation at public research universities. Review of Higher Education, 21, 209–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. (1999). Building the responsive campus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1979). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative science quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar