The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition: Lessons from Four Departments

References

• Abedi, J., & Benkin, E. (1987). The effects of students' academic, financial, and demographic variables on time to the doctorate. Research in Higher Education, 27(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Universities. (1998). Committee on graduate education: Report and recommendations. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. C. (1990, 27 April). Supply and demand for scientists and engineers: A national crisis in the making. Science, 248, 425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, L. L. (1990). Disciplines and doctorates: The relationships between program characteristics and duration of doctoral study. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 369–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, L. L. (1978, Fall). Students' expectations and the realities of graduate and professional schools. College and University, 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, L. L. (1993). Using research and theoretical models of graduate student progress. In L. L. Baird (Ed.), Increasing graduate student retention and degree attainment (New Directions in Institutional Research, Vol. 80, pp. 3–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Magolda, M. B. Baxter (1998). Developing self-authorship in graduate school. In M. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (New Directions in Higher Education, Vol. 101, pp. 41–54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, H. M., & Ferber, M. A. (1983). Men and women graduate students: Who succeeds and why? Journal of Higher Education, 54(6), 629–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boufis, C., & Olsen, V. C. (Eds.). (1997). On the market: Surviving the academic job search. New York: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., & Sosa, J. A. (1989). Prospects for faculty in the arts and sciences: A study of factors affecting demand and supply, 1987–2012. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, P., & Boice, B. (1998). Best practices for enculturation: Collegiality, mentoring, and structure. In M. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (New Directions in Higher Education, Vol. 101, pp. 87–94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. F., Castaneda, M. B., Nora, A., & Hengstler, D. (1992). The convergence between two theories of college persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Postsecondary Education Commission. (1990). Shortening time to the doctoral degree (California Report No. 90–29). Sacramento, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association for Graduate Studies. (2003). The completion of graduate studies in Canadian universities: Report and recommendations. Ottawa, ON: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1994). A classification of institutions of higher education: A technical report. Princeton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1984). The organizational conception. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), Perspectives on higher education: Eight disciplinary and comparative views (pp. 106–131). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1997). Small worlds, different worlds: The uniquenesses and troubles of American academic professionals. Daedelus, 126(4), 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (1995). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (1996). A national conversation on doctoral education: An emerging consensus report from the National Convocation on Science and Engineering Doctoral Education [On-line]. Available: http://www2.nas.edu/convo/. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M., & Swanson, A. (1978). The interaction of student and program variables for the purpose of developing a model for predicting graduation from graduate programs over a 10-year period. Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Graduate Schools. (1990). The doctor of philosophy degree. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Graduate Schools. (2004). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policy, numbers, leadership and next steps. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Crowson, R. L. (1987). Qualitative research methods in higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 1–56). Bronx, NY: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (1998). Survival skills for graduate school and beyond. In M. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (New Directions in Higher Education, Vol. 101, pp. 29–40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, R. (1998, June). The old era in American graduate education. Paper presented at the NISE Forum on Graduate Education, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gerholm, T. (1990). On tacit knowledge in Academia. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 263–271.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, L., Seneca, J. J., & Taussig, M. K. (1991). The determinants of progress to the doctoral degree. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 449–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger, M., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (Eds.). (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (1996). How departmental contextual factors shape doctoral student attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first year doctoral attrition. In M. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (Vol. 101, pp. 55–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 119–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education [On-line]. Available: www.phd-survey.org. Philadelphia, PA: A report for The Pew Charitable Trusts.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D. S. (1995, December 6). Surplus in science. Washington Post, p. A25.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gumport, P. J. (1993a). Graduate education and organized research in the United States. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan (pp. 225–260). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumport, P. J. (1993b). Graduate education and research imperatives: Views from American campuses. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan (pp. 261–296). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. P. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Jacks, P., Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., & Connolly, T. (1983). The ABCs of ABDs: A study of incomplete doctorates. Improving College and University Teaching, 31(2), 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Bruce, J. M., & Gilligan, M. (1993). The science of political science graduate admissions. PS: Political Science & Politics, 26(4), 772–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. B. (1987). Factors related to attrition and success in degree and non-degree doctoral students in education. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study (1st ed.). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lunneborg, C. E., & Lunneborg, P. W. (1973). Doctoral study attrition in psychology. Research in Higher Education, 1, 379–387.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Modern Language Association. (1998). Final report of the MLA Committee on Professional Employment [On-line]. Available: http://www.mla.org/reports/contents.htm. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Science Education. (1998). Graduate education forum [On-line]. Available:http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/NISE/About_NISE/NISE_Brochure/Grad_Sci_Math_Eng_Tech_Educ1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). Summary report 1995: Doctorate recipients from United States universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1998). Trends in the early careers of life scientists. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (1997). The federal role in science and engineering graduate and postdoctoral education. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2003). The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America's potential (No. NSB 03-69). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C., & Lovitts, B. E. (2001, June 29). 10 ways to keep graduate students from quitting. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B20.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1993). From facts to action: Expanding the graduate division's educational role. In L. Baird (Ed.), Increasing graduate student retention and degree attainment (New Directions in Institutional Research, Vol. 80, pp. 27–40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1996). Increasing student retention in graduate and professional programs. In J. G. Haworth (Ed.), Assessing graduate and professional education: Current realities, future prospects (New Directions in Institutional Research, Vol. 42, 61–76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K. et al. (1999). On the road to becoming a professor: The graduate student experience. Change, 31(3), 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. I. (1998). Summary of workshop on graduate student attrition. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., & Golde, C. M. (1999, November). Waffling and flailing: Undergraduates in pursuit of the Ph.D. Paper presented at the conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L. R. (Ed.). (1985). The state of graduate education. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G. (1996). Achieving faculty diversity: Debunking the myths. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996, Jan.–Feb.). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist, 84, 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A., Gottlieb, D., & Pease, J. (1964). Factors related to attrition among doctoral students. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, R. L. (1989). Factors affecting doctoral students' time to degree. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1991). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar