The Politics of Determining Merit Aid Eligibility Criteria: An Analysis of the Policy Process

References

• Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (Eds.). (2002). Policy dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 395–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 223–260). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(March), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B., & Sridhar, D. J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 761–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., & Jackson, L. A. (1999). Who loses HOPE? Attrition from Georgia's college scholarship program. Southern Economic Journal, 66, 379–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deGive, M. L., & Olswang, S. (1999). Coalition building to create a branch campus system. Review of Higher Education, 22, 287–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 259–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynarski, S. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53, 629–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynarski, S. (2004). The new merit aid. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, T. C. (2001, April 4). Wise warns ‘no Promise, no budget.’ Charleston Daily Mail, p. 1A.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (1995, March 2). Lottery push loses momentum. Albuquerque Journal, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., Jones, M., & Branscomb, L. M. (1997). The demand for and supply of technical information and analysis in state legislatures. Policy Studies Journal, 25, 451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D. E. (2004). The devil is in the details: An analysis of eligibility criteria for merit scholarships in Massachusetts. In D. E. Heller & P. Marin (Ed.), State Merit Scholarship Programs and Racial Inequality (pp. 25–45). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, D. E., & Marin, P. (Eds.) (2002). Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, D. E., & Marin, P. (Eds.) (2004). State merit scholarship programs and racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Hird, J. A. (2005). Policy analysis for what? The effectiveness of nonpartisan policy research organizations. Journal of Policy Studies, 33, 83–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabler, P. (2001, April 14). Conferees nearer to gray bill compromise. Charleston Gazette, p. 1A.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, D. W., & Berdahl, R. O. (2008). The politics of restructuring higher education in Virginia: A case study. Review of Higher Education, 31, 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, D., & Novak, R. (2003). Substance vs. politics: Through the dark mirror of governance reform. Educational Policy, 17, 98–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. C. (2002). Understanding state higher education systems: Applying a new framework. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 349–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. (2004). Congress: The electoral connection (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K. (2003a). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 479–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K. (2003b). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17, 165–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Analyzing qualitative data (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M. R. (2007). Stories of politics and policy: Florida's higher education governance reorganization. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 162–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP). (2007). 37th Annual Survey Report 2002–03 Academic Year. Washington, DC: NASSGAP.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, E. C. (2008). Merit aid and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, E. C., & Noland, B. E. (2007). Targeted merit aid: Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship program. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 37, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, E. C., & Tucker, R. (2008). Eligibility effects on college access: Underrepresented student perceptions of Tennessee's merit aid program. Research in Higher Education, 49, 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proposed rules for the Promise scholarship program. (2001, April 2). Associated Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (2007). The need for better theories. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, F. (2001, April 5). West Virginia's Governor's scholarship program given a new life in legislature. Charleston Gazette, p. 1 A.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, E. P., & Chung, C. (2004). Merit and equity: Rethinking award criteria in the Michigan Merit Scholarship Program. In E. P. St. John & M. D. Parsons (Ed.), Public funding of higher education (pp. 124–140). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trow, M. (1998). Governance in the University of California: The transformation of politics over administration. Higher Education Policy, 11, 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1983). Ideology, interests, and information: The basis of policy positions. In D. Callahan & B. Jennings (Ed.), Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis (pp. 213–245). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Youngman, S. (2003, March 28). Bredesen, sponsors meet to hash out particulars of lottery bill. Memphis Commercial Appeal, p. A14.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar