What Matters for Excellence in PhD Programs? Latent Constructs of Doctoral Program Quality Used by Early Career Social Scientists

References

• Brooks, R. L. (2005). Measuring university quality. The Review of Higher Education, 29, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartter, A. M. (1966). An assessment of quality in graduate education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• CIRGE (Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education). (n.d.). Data reports. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J. (1976). The meaning of quality in graduate and professional education. In J. Katz & R. T. Hartnett (Eds.), Scholars in the making: The development of graduate and professional students (pp. 85–102). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J., Hartnett, R. T., & Baird, L. L. (1976). Assessing dimensions of quality in doctoral education: A technical report of a national study in three fields. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• COSEPUP (Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy). (1995). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15, 654–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (Eds.). (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.PhD-survey.org
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L.V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P.E. (1982). An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Social & behavioral sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 175–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, E., Rudd, E., Picciano, E., & Nerad, M. (2011). Are you satisfied? PhD education and faculty taste for prestige—limits of the prestige value system. Research in Higher Education, 52 (1), 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R. J., Flannigan, S., & Yerkie, M. (2005). America's best colleges. U.S. News and World Report, 139 (7), 78.
   Google Scholar
• NAGPS (National Association of Graduate and Professional Students). (n.d.). 2000 national doctoral program survey executive summary. Retrieved from http://survey.nagps.org/about/execsummary.php
   Google Scholar
• National Communication Association. (1996). A study of the reputations of doctoral programs in communication. Retrieved from http://www.natcom.org/uploadedFiles/Content/Education/A%20Study%20of%20the%20Reputations%20of%20Doctoral%20Programs%20in%20Communication%201996.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2009). A guide to the methodology of the national research council assessment of doctorate programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, facts, and remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17, 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., Aanerud, R., & Cerny, J. (2004). “So you want to be a professor#” Lessons from the PhDs—Ten Years Later study. In D. H. Wulff, A. E. Austin, & Associates, (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 137–158). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1999a). PhDs—ten years later: Final results. Paper presented at the CGS Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1999b). Widening the circle: Another look at women graduate students. CGS Communicator, 32 (6).
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., Rudd, E., Morrison, E., & Picciano, J. (2007). Social science PhDs—Five + years out, A national survey of PhDs in six fields highlights report. Seattle, WA: Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education. Available at www.cirge.washington.edu
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Stewart, C. L. (1991, May). Assessing doctoral student experience: Gender and departmental culture. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Institutional Research, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Nyquist, J. D. (2002). The PhD: A tapestry of change for the 21st century. Change, November/December.
   Google Scholar
• Ostriker, J. P., & Kuh, C. V. (Eds.) (assisted by Voytuk, J. A.). (2003). Assessing research-doctorate programs: A methodology study. Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, J., Rudd, E., Morrison, E., & Nerad, M. (2007). Social science PhDs—Five + years out: Survey methods. CIRGE Report 2007-01. Seattle, WA: Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education. Available at www.cirge.washington.edu
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, K. D., & Andersen, C. J. (1970). A rating of graduate programs. American Council on Education: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, R. (2008). PhD completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline data. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2004). Factor analysis with categorical indicators: A comparison between traditional and latent class approaches. In A. Van der Ark, M. A. Croon, & K. Sijtsma (Eds.), New developments in categorical data analysis for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 41–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar