The Conditioning Role of State Higher Education Governance Structures

References

• Adams, J. S. (1976) The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In M. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of organizational and industrial psychology (pp. 1175–1199). Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Aldritch, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. The Academy of Management Review, 2 (2), 217–230.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. The Journal of Higher Education, 77 (4), 618–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrilleaux, C., & Berkman, M. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policy making. Political Research Quarterly, 56 (4), 409–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrilleaux, C., & Bernick E. (2003). Deservingness, discretion, and the state politics of welfare spending, 1990–96. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3 (1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–1993. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 337–348.
   Google Scholar
• Beyle, T. (2003). The governors. In V. Gray & R. R. Hanson (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (8th ed., pp. 194–231). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyle, T., & Ferguson, M. (2007). The governors and the executive branch. In V. Gray & R. R. Hanson (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (9th ed., pp. 192–228). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borghers, E., & Wessa, P. (2006). Online econometrics textbook: Statistics—econometrics—forecasting. Retrieved from http://www.xycoon.com/
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (1996). Systems, boundaries, and information flow. The Academy of Management Journal, 9 (4), 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., Niemi, R. G., & Powell, L. W. (2000). Incumbency and the probability of reelection in state legislative elections. Journal of Politics, 62, 671–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1982). The control of the campus: A report on the governance of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E. (1988). Institutions, the economy, and the dynamics of state elections. American Political Science Review, 82 (1), 133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Governmental Ethics Laws [CGEL]. (1980–1992). Blue book. Sacramento, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council of State Governments [CSG]. (1977–2005). The book of the states. Lexington, KY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dar, L., & Spence, M. J. (2011). Partisanship, political polarization, and state budget outcomes: The case of higher education. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1577365
   Google Scholar
• Dometrius, N. C. (1987). Changing gubernatorial power: The measure vs. reality. Western Political Quarterly, 40 (2), 319–328.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28 (3), 259–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Commission of the States. (1976–1986). State postsecondary education profiles handbook. Denver, Colorado: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Education Commission of the States. (2006). Postsecondary governance structures database. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/issuesPS.asp
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, M., & Alexander, J. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments, The Academy of Management Journal, 30 (3), 456–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. (1994). Divided government in the American states: A byproduct of legislative professionalism? American Political Science Review, 88, 304–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenny, L. A. (1959). Autonomy of public colleges: The challenge of coordination. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, L. A. (1970). Institutional autonomy for whom? In G. K. Smith (Ed.), The troubled campus: Current issues in higher education (pp. 153–160). Washington, DC: AAHE.
   Google Scholar
• Gove, S. K., & Carpenter, J. (1977). State lobbying for higher education. Educational Record, 58 (4), 357–373.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, V., & Lowery D. (1999). The population ecology of interest representation: Lobbying communities in the American states. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. (2012). Economic analysis (7th ed). New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between U.S. politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29 (1), 87–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (2000). Between politics and science: Credibility on the line. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26 (4), 399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D., Jones, M., & Branscomb, L. M. (1997). The demand for and supply of technical information and analysis in state legislatures. Policy Studies Journal, 25 (3), 451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. P. (1996). Influences on re-invention during the diffusion of innovations. Political Research Quarterly, 49 (3), 631–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16 (2), 161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C., & Marine, G. (1996). Region, resources, reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37 (1), 241–278.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J. P., Lauman, E. O., Nelson, R. L., & Salisbury, R. H. (1993). The hollow core: Private interests in national policy making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R. M., & Garand, J. C. (1991). Expenditure tradeoffs in the U.S. states: A pooled analysis. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 1 (3), 295–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hossler, D., Lund, J. P., Ramin, J., Westfall, S., & Irish, S. (1997). State funding for higher education: The sisyphean task. The Journal of Higher Education, 68 (2), 160–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. G., & Schneider, S. K. (2001). Variability in state policy priorities: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Politics, 63 (2), 544–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. N. (2003). Correlation analysis. Retrieved from http://www.csus.edu/indiv/j/jensena/mgmt105/correl01.htm
   Google Scholar
• King, J. E. (2003). Status of the pell grant report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, R. C. (2001). Governmental structure, trustee selection, and public university prices and spending. American Journal of Political Science, 45 (4), 845–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, A. (1988–1997). State postsecondary education structures handbook. Denver, Colorado: Education Commission of the States.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, A. (2003). Models of postsecondary education and governance in the States. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K. (2003a). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 74 (5), 479–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K. (2003b). State governance reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 18, pp. 57–143). London: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Deaton, S. B., & Hearn, J. C. (2007). The enactment of reforms in state governance of higher education: Testing the political instability hypothesis. The Journal of Higher Education, 78 (6), 645–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28 (1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Mokher, C. G. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80 (6), 686–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76 (4), 363–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Mokher, C. G., & Doyle, W. (2009). Privileging public research universities: The political economy of state appropriations to higher education. Journal of Education Finance, 34 (4), 372–401.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., & Ness, E. C. (2009). The politics of state higher education governance reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 78 (4), 66–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson, T. G. (2005). State tax fund appropriations for higher education 1961 to 2005. Oskaloosa, IA: Postsecondary Education Opportunity.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of State Budget Officers [NASBO]. (1977–2002). Budget processes of the states. Denver, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (1977–2005). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures [NCSL]. (2006). National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from www.ncls.org
   Google Scholar
• Ness, E. (2010). The role of information in the policy process: Implications for the examination of research utilization in higher education policy. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 1–49). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Meier, K. J. (2003). Politics, structure, and public policy: The case of higher education. Educational Policy, 17 (1), 80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. G. (1976). Environmental and political determinants of state higher education appropriations policies. The Journal of Higher Education, 47 (5), 523–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M. J. (2004). A (less than) zero-sum game? State funding for public higher education: How public higher education institutions have lost. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, A. (1991). Legislative life. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, A. (1998). The decline of representative democracy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, C. (2008). Uncovering information's role in the state higher education policymaking process. Educational Policy, 22 (6), 875–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHEEO. (2009). State budgeting for higher education in the United States. Boulder, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, P. (1992). Legislative professionalization and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17 (1), 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, P. (2000). Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25 (1), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, P., & Hamm, K. E. (2005). 101 chambers: Congress, state legislatures and the future of legislative studies. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2006). State-level higher education interest group alliances. Higher Education in Review, 3, 25–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2008). The politics of state higher education funding. Higher Education in Review, 5, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2010a). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51 (5), 416–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2010b). Interest groups and governmental institutions: The politics of state funding of public higher education. Educational Policy, 24 (5), 735–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., & Anderson, C. K. (2012). Where politics is a blood sport: Restructuring state higher education governance in Massachusetts. Educational Policy, 4 (26), 564–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., & Ness E. (2011). State capital expenditures for higher education: ‘Where the real politics happens.’ Journal of Education Finance, 36 (4), 394–423.
   Google Scholar
• Trostel, P. A., & Ronca, J. M. (2009). A simple unifying measure of state support for postsecondary education. Research in Higher Education, 50 (3), 215–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, D. (1951). The governmental process. Knopf: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. The Academy of Management Journal, 24 (2), 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCLA Academic Technology Services. (2006). Stata FAQ: How can I check for collinearity in survey regression? Retrieved from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/svycollin.htm
   Google Scholar
• Volkwein, J. F., & Tandberg, D. A. (2008). Measuring up: Examining the connections among state structural characteristics, regulatory practices, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 49 (2), 180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, D. J. (1987). Legislators use of policy information. American Behavioral Scientist, 30, 612–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2006). Examining differences in state support for higher education: A comparative study of state appropriations for Research I universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 935–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, C. W., & Browne, W. P. (1982). Interest groups and public policy within a state legislative setting. Polity, 14, 548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (2005). Multicollinearity. Retrieved from http://www.nd.edu/∼rwilliam/stats2/l11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zumeta, W. (1996). Meeting the demand for higher education without breaking the bank. The Journal of Higher Education, 67 (4), 367–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar