Is the Tenure Process Fair? What Faculty Think

References

• Alexander, J. C., Jr. (1992). Mentoring: On the road to tenure and promotion. ACA Bulletin, 79, 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, M. (2002). Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 803–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, M., & Cropanzano, R. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S., Huston, T., & Norman, M. (2005). A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46 (7), 803–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45 (2), 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A., & Rice, E. (1998). Making tenure viable: Listening to early career faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 41 (5), 736–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayree, S., Chen, Z., & Budhwar, P. (2004). Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, K., & Mertz, E. (2012). Is it fair? Law professors' perceptions of tenure (2010). Journal of Legal Education, 61 (4), Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1721668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D., & Tucker, J. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 707–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, Great Britain: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beugré, C. D., & Baron, R. A. (2001). Perceptions of systemic justice: The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31 (2), 324–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R. (2013). The delivery of bad news in organizations: A framework for analysis. Journal of Management, 39 (1), 136–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R., & Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. Lewicki, M. Bazerman, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R., Shapiro, D., & Cummings, L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 15, 381–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 127, 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R., & Lawrence, J. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobocel, D. R., & Holmvall, C. (2001). Are interactional justice and procedural justice different? Framing the debate. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 85–110). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (1993). Early turning points in professorial careers of women and minorities. In J. Gainen & R. Boice (Eds.), Building a diverse faculty (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 53, pp. 71–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, P. (1993). Challenges, rewards, and costs for feminist and ethnic minority scholars. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 53, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, P., & Farnsworth, L. (1998). Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education, 39 (5), 557–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein, P., Rothblum, E., & Solomon, S. (1993). Ivy halls and glass walls: Barriers to academic careers for women and ethnic minorities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 53, 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2012, June 25). Professor tenure as insurance: What the Wall Street Journal debate missed. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffrey-brown/2012/06/25/professor-tenure-as-insurance-what-the-wall-street-journal-debate-missed/
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2000). The sounds of silence: Life in the postmodern university. Educational Forum, 64 (4), 324–331.
   Google Scholar
• Burgan, M. (1998). Academic citizenship: A fading vision. Liberal Education, 84 (4), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, T., & Hyer, P. (2010). An examination of departure trends and tenure rates among pre-tenure faculty: A ten year cohort study (1996–2005). Retrieved from http://www.provost.vt.edu/documents/departure_trends.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cawyer, C. S., & Friedrich, G. W. (1998). Organizational socialization: Processes for new communication faculty. Communication Education, 47, 234–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawyer, C. S., Simonds, C., & Davis, S. (2002). Mentoring to facilitate socialization: The case of the new faculty member. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Chait, R. (February 7, 1997). Why academe needs more employment options. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B4.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 425–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 165–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J., Noe, R., & Jackson, C. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55 (1), 83–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural fairness, self, and cooperation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 151–218). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, B. D., & Villaplando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35 (2), 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Dipboye, R., & de Pontbraind, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooris, M., & Guidos, M. (2006, May). Tenure achievement rates at research universities. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Drago, R., Colbeck, C., Stauffer, K. D., Pirretti, A., Burkum, K., Fazioli, J., Lazarro, G., & Habasevich, T. (2005). Bias against care giving. Academe 91 (5), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (1999). The academic department: How does it fit into the university reform agenda? Change, 31 (5), 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., Rizzo, M. R., & Jackson, G. H. (2003). Who bears the growing cost of science at universities? Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, Working Paper 35.
   Google Scholar
• Euben, D. R. (2002). Tenure: Perspectives and challenges. AAUP Perspectives and Challenges. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/issues/tenure/tenure-perspectives-and-challenges-2002
   Google Scholar
• Exum, W. H. (1983). Climbing the crystal stair: Values, affirmative action, and minority faculty. Social Problems 30 (4), 383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenelon, J. (2003). Race, research, and tenure: Institutional credibility and the incorporation of African, Latino, and American Indian faculty. Journal of Black Studies, 34 (1), 87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J., & LaCelle-Peterson, M. W. (1992). New and junior faculty: A review of the literature. In M. D. Sorcinelli & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Developing new and junior faculty (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 50, pp. 5–14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Schuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transition. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 3, 145–183.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, P. (2006, September 1). U. of Colorado report urges tenure changes. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/U-of-Colorado-Report-Urges/26420/
   Google Scholar
• Gappa, J., Austin, A., & Trice, A. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education's strategic imperative. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gappa, J., & Trice, A. (2009). Rethinking faculty work and workplaces for women. On Campus with Women, 37 (3). Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/ocww/volume37_3
   Google Scholar
• Garza, H. (1993). Second-class academics: Chicano/Latino faculty in U.S. universities. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 53, 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, L. (2010). Professionalization as the basis for academic freedom and faculty governance. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, 1, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gmelch, W. H., & Schuh, J. H. (2004). Editors' Notes. W. H. Gmelch & J. H. Schuh (Eds.) New Directions for Higher Education (No. 126; pp. 1–2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gmelch, W. H., Wilke, P. K., & Lovrich, N. P. (1986). Dimensions of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national study. Research in Higher Education, 24, 266–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graubard, S. R. (2001). The American academic profession. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1986). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.). Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 25–41). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16 (2), 399–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., & Anderson, M. (2002). Conflict in academic departments: An analysis of disputes over faculty promotion and tenure. Research in Higher Education, 43 (5), 503–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., & Sharkness, J. (2008). Scholarship is changing, and so must tenure review. Academe, 94 (5), 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Huston, T., Norman, M., & Ambrose, S. (2007) Expanding the discussion of faculty vitality to include productive but disengaged senior faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 78 (5), 493–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Chapter 3. Postsecondary education. Digest of Educational Statistics, 2011. National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2010menu_tables.asp
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2004). The story is not in the numbers: Academic socialization and diversifying the faculty. Feminist Formations, 16 (1), 172–185.
   Google Scholar
• Jayakumar, U., Howard, T., Allen, W., & Han, J. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 80 (5), 538–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K. (1993). Women and minority faculty experiences: Defining and responding to diverse realities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 53, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K., & Atwater, C. D. (1993). Scaffolding the ivory tower: Building supports for new faculty to the academy. CUPA Journal 44 (1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K., & Des Jarlais, C. (1994). Barriers to tenure for women and minorities. The Review of Higher Education, 17 (4), 335–353.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intention to leave. The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (4), 518–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• June, A. W. (2012, November 13). Tenure decisions at Southern Cal strongly favor white men, data in a rejected candidate's complaint suggest. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Tenure-Decisions-at-Southern/135754/
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, D., & Geisler, C. (2012). Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender. Science, 335, 864–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic duty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodny, A. (1996). “60 minutes” at the University of Arizona: The polemic against tenure. New Literary History, 27 (4), 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kram, K. (1983). Phases in the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J., Ott, M., & Bell, A. (2012). Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship. Research in Higher Education, 53 (3), 325–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (5), 952–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E., Lissak, R., & Conlon, D. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13 (4), 338–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E., Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (4), 767–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1 (2), 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111 (3), 490–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: Organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., & Schapiro, M. (1999). Tenure issues in higher education. The Journal of Economics Perspectives, 13 (1), 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, J., Lundquist, J., Holmes, E., & Agiomavritis, J. (2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe, 97 (1), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. M., & Sagaria, M. A. (1993). The situation of women in research universities in the United States: Within the inner circles of academic power. In J. S. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon, & B. K. Townsend (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist's perspective (pp. 227–240). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behavior: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (1), 652–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, K. (1999). Nice work if we can keep it: Confessions of a junior professor. Academe, 85 (3), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, M., Ambrose, S., & Huston, T. (2006). Assessing and addressing faculty morale: Cultivating consciousness, empathy, and empowerment. The Review of Higher Education, 29 (3), 347–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, D. (1993). Work satisfaction and stress in the first and third year of academic appointment. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, D., & Crawford, L. A. (1998). A five-year study of junior faculty expectations about their work. The Review of Higher Education 22 (1), 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, D., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (1992). The pretenure years: A longitudinal perspective. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 50, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26 (1), 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Meara, K., & Campbell, C. (2011). Faculty sense of agency in decisions about work and family. The Review of Higher Education, 54 (3), 447–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, K., & Hendry, L. B. (2000). Making sense of mentoring or mentoring making sense? Reflections on the mentoring process by adult mentors with young people. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponjuan, L., Conley, V., & Trower, K. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. The Journal of Higher Education, 82 (3), 319–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, D. K., Ortiz, B. P., Douthitt, R. A., & Reed, L. L. (1989). The academic revolving door: Why do women get caught? CUPA Journal, 40 (1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation. (New Pathways Working Paper Series, Inquiry No. 7). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Riger, S., Stokes, J., Raja, S., & Sullivan, M. (1997). Measuring perceptions of the work environment for female faculty. The Review of Higher Education 21 (1), 63–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, N., & Nelson, C. (2012, June 24). Should tenure for college professors be abolished? Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303610504577418293114042070.html?KEYWORDS=tenure
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, V. (2004). Faculty member's intention to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45 (3), 285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. (2007). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the Department of Defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19 (1), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Astin, A., Arredondo, M., & Korn, W. S. (1996). The American college teacher: National norms for the 1995–96 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Schminke, M., Ambrose, M., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (2), 294–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., Cawyer, C., & Sanders, R. (2003). An examination of academic mentoring behaviors and new faculty members' satisfaction with socialization and tenure and promotion processes. Communication Education, 52 (1), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Seldin, P. (1987). Research findings on causes of academic stress. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 29, 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Robinson, A., & Williams-Green, J. (1995). Differences in perceptions of African American women and men faculty and administrators. The Journal of Negro Education, 64 (4), 401–408.
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J. (2003) Of different minds: An accessibility identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli, M. D. (1992). New and junior faculty stress: Research and responses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 50, 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development. Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W.G., & Bensimon, E. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure, and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S. (1995). The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48 (3), 562–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trower, C. A. (2002). What is current policy? In R. Chait (Ed.), The questions of tenure (pp. 32–68). Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C. S. V., Gonzalez, J. C., & Wood, J. L. (2008). Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1 (3), 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. L., & Boice, R. (1987). Starting at the beginning: The concerns and needs of new faculty. In J. Kurfi, L. Hilsen, L. Mortensen, & R. Wadworth (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational Development (Vol. 6, pp. 41–47). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (5), 850–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., & Bies, R. (1989). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justices. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Advances in applied social psychology: Business settings (pp. 77–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares, S. E. (2007). Challenges in the tenure process: The experiences of faculty of color who conduct social science, race-based academic work (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (3257167)
   Google Scholar
• van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273–300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van den Prooijen, J., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (6), 1353–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C., Alon, T., & Bornstein, S. (2006). Beyond the “chilly climate”: Eliminating bias against women and fathers in academe. Thought and Action, 22, 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B., & Williams, S. (2006). Perceptions of African American male junior faculty on promotion and tenure: Implications for community building and social capital. Teachers College Record, 108 (2), 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, E. (1991). Hit the ground running: Experiences of new faculty in a school of education. Review of Higher Education, 14 (2), 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf-Wendel, L. E., Twombly, S., & Rice, S. (2003). The two-body problem: Dual career couple hiring policies in higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. J. (2008). Faculty turnover: Discipline-specific attention is warranted. Research in Higher Education, 49, 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, T., & Price, T. (2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 80 (2), 204–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar