Gaining Access or Losing Ground? Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students in Undergraduate Engineering, 1994—2003

References

• Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance (2010). The rising price of inequality: How inadequate grant aid limits college access and persistence. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/items/biz/pdf/acsfa_rpi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. (1992). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 362404). Los Angeles: UCLA, Higher Education Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NCES 2011–033). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S., & Ma, J. (2007). Education pays: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. New York: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T., & Morest, V. S. (Eds.) (2006). Defending the community college equity agenda. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, I.R. (2002). Are all “adolescent econometricians” created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 19–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. R. Nice (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C. (1997). Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). The effect of college costs and financial aid on access to engineering. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., & Jackson, L. A. (1999). Who loses HOPE? Attrition from Georgia's college scholarship program. Southern Economic Journal, 66(2), 379–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., & Kienzl, G. S. (2006). It's not enough to get through the open door: Inequalities by social background in transfer from community colleges to four-year colleges. Teachers College Record, 108(3), 452–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., & Allen, D. J. (2011). Uncontrolled destinies: Improving opportunity for low-income students in American higher education. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 786–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineering Workforce Commission. (2009). Engineering and technology enrollments. Washington, DC: American Association of Engineering Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, J., & Tinto, V. (2008). Moving beyond access: College success for low-income, first-generation students. Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ensminger, M. E., Forrest, C. B., Riley, A. W., Kang, M, Green, B. F., Starfield, B., & Ryan, S. A. (2000). The validity of measures of socioeconomic status of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(3), 392–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65(6), 1521–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2009). Successful programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Adapting versus adopting the institutional environment. Research in Higher Education, 50(4), 333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, A., Persaud, A., Kharem, D., Rothwell, W., & Yoder, E. (2010). Money, math and engineering graduation: More high school funding could mean more underrepresented engineers. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Vancouver, BC: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. T. (2011). Engineering by the numbers, profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges, 2010 edition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. (2006). Placing college graduation rates in context: How 4-year college graduation rates vary with selectivity and the size of low-income enrollment (NCES 2007–161). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M., & Avery, C. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low-income students (No. w18586). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (Ed.). (2010). Recognizing and serving low-income students in postsecondary education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A., & Conley, D. (Eds.). (2008). Social class: How does it work? New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Wong, K. K. (2004). The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 797–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena, J.C. (2003). Flexible engineers: History, challenges, and opportunities for engineering education. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 23(6), 419–435.
   Google Scholar
• Long, R. A. (2013). The multiple-institution database for investigating engineering longitudinal development (MIDFIELD). Retrieved from https://engineering.purdue.edu/MIDFIELD
   Google Scholar
• Lundy-Wagner, V. C. (2012). “Class” ifying ethnicity/race and gender: An intersectional critique of bachelor's degree completion research. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education & Information Studies, 8(2). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nc1m3m0
   Google Scholar
• Lundy-Wagner, V., Salzman, N., & Ohland, M. (2013). Reimagining engineering diversity: A study of academic advisors' perspectives on socioeconomic status. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Lundy, G., & Fischer, M. J. (2003). The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America's selective colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M., & Calderone, S. (2006). The meaning of money: Perceptual differences between college counselors and low-income families about college costs and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1703–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of Education Statistics, 2011 (NCES 2012–001, Table 3). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. (2012). Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape: Summary of a summit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2003). The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America's potential (NSB 03–69). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012 (NSB 12–01). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2012). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2012 (NSF 11–309). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Long, R. A., Lord, S. M., & Wasburn, M. H. (2011). Race, gender, and measure of success in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., Orr, M. K., Lundy-Wagner, V., Veenstra, C. P., & Long, R. A., (2012). Viewing access and persistence in engineering through a socioeconomic lens. In Baillie, C., Pawley, A.L., & Riley, D. (Eds.), Engineering and social justice in the university and beyond (pp. 157–180). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, M. K., Ramirez, N., & Ohland, M. W. (2011). Socioeconomic trends in engineering: Enrollment, persistence, and academic achievement. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, A. (2010). Neighborhoods and schools as competing and reinforcing contexts for educational attainment. Sociology of Education, 83(4), 287–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, D. B. (1962). Handbook of statistical tables. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pawley, A. L. (2004). The feminist engineering classroom: A vision for future educational innovations. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 117–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W., Lundy-Wagner, V., Drezner, N. D., Gasman, M., Yoon, S., Bose, E., & Gary, S. (2009). The contribution of HBCUs to the preparation of African American women for STEM careers: A case study. Research in Higher Education, 50(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Prepare and inspire: K–12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America's future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. H., Hurtado, S., DeAngelo, L., Palucki Blake, L., & Tran, S. (2010). The American freshman: National norms fall 2010. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Roksa, J., & Potter, D. (2011). Parenting and academic achievement: Intergenerational transmission of educational advantage. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. F. (2004). The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate colleges. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifer, S., & McDermott, E. (2011). From dreams to plans to college: Effective practices in five diverse programs. Washington State GEAR UP Evaluation Report Series, (Vol. 1). Portland, OR: Education Northwest.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S., Gilmartin, S., Chen, H. L., Donaldson, K., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, V., Lande, M., & Toye, G. (2010). Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the academic pathways of people learning engineering survey (APPLES) (CAEE-TR-10–01). Seattle, WA: Center for the Advancement for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., & Bernal, E. M. (2001). Swimming against the tide: The poor in American higher education. New York: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). American FactFinder fact sheet: Race and ethnicity. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Common Core of Data (CCD)—CCD quick facts. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/quickfacts.asp
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, C. P., Dey, E. L., & Herrin, G. D. (2009). A model for freshman engineering retention. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(3), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, C. P., Padró, F. F., & Furst-Bowe, J. A. (2012). Summary and recommendations. In C. P. Veenstra, F. Padró, & J. Furst-Bowe (Eds.), Advancing the STEM agenda: Quality improvement supports STEM (pp. 267–273), Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2005). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar