Deeply Affecting First-Year Students' Thinking: Deep Approaches to Learning and Three Dimensions of Cognitive Development

References

• Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Colleges & Universities [AAC&U]. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. (1977). Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Beatie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1988). Approaches to learning and to essay writing. In R.R. Schmeck (Ed.) Learning Strategies and Learning Styles (pp. 185–228). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPO-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, G., Pascarella, E., & Pierson, C. (2004). Postsecondary education and some dimensions of literacy development: An exploration of longitudinal evidence. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 306–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, B. S. (2001) Emphasising concepts and reasoning skills in introductory college molecular cell biology. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1157–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., & Brawer, F. (2003). The American community college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, S., & Loomis, R. (2002). Utilizing need for cognition and perceived self-efficacy to predict academic performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1687–1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., & Mayhew, M. J. (2007). The influence of first-year success courses on student learning and democratic outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 241–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Enwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London, UK: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Tait, H. (1994). The revised approaches to study inventory. Edinburgh: Centre for Research into Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Ethington, C.A. (1997). A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XII, pp. 165–194). New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 507–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S., & Habeshaw, T. (1989). 53 interesting ways to appraise your teaching. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, L., Kember, D., & Cooper, B. (1994). The teaching context and approaches to study of accountancy students. Issues in Accounting Education, 9, 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, W. N. (1996). Working the middle: Strengthening education and training for the mid-skilled labor force. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. W., Bolen, L. M., & Gupton, R. H. (1995). Predictive validity of the Study Process Questionnaire for undergraduate students. College Student Journal, 29, 234–239.
   Google Scholar
• Lonka, K., Keikkila, A., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Maury, S. (1997, August). Are epistemologies related to study activities in innovative courses? Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKensie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Parsons, P., & Dunne, T. T. (1990). Individual study orchestrations and their association with learning outcomes. Higher Education, 20, 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., Niskodé-Dossett, A. S., & Banks, J. (2008, November). The predictive validity of a measure of deep approaches to learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. (2006, May). Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement. Paper presented at the annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson Laird, T., Shoup, R., Kuh, G., & Schwarz, M. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49, 469–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–61). New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T. (1999). New studies track community college effects on students. Community College Journal, 69, 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., Bohr, L., Nora, A., & Terenzini, P. (1995). Cognitive effects of 2-year and 4-year colleges: New evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, W. G., Jr. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Colt, Reinhardt, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1948). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Millar, R. (1989). The “how” and “why” of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 513–528.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, R. D., Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K., & Terenzini, P. T. (2010, May). Deep learning as an individual, conditional, and contextual influence on first-ear student outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowell, J. A., Dawson, C. J., & Pollard, J. M. (1993). First year university physics: Who succeeds? Research in Science and Technological Education, 11, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, N. (1967). Where colleges fail: A study of the student as a person. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K. (2001). Lifelong learning. Retrieved from http//www.infed.org/lifelonglearning/b-life.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, J. (2003). The learning paradigm college. Boston: Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., Salminen, R. T., Sutela, T., Nuutinen, A., & Pitkänen, S. (2005). Factors related to study success in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. (1992). Learning styles and regulation of learning processes in higher education: Towards process-oriented instruction in autonomous thinking. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychological Review, 16(4), 359–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, G. (1988). Improving medical students' clinical problem-solving. In P. Ramsden (Ed.) Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 199–214). London, England: Korgan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. R., Hrymak, A. N., & Wright, H. M. (2000, June). Approaches to learning and learning environments in problem-based versus lecture-based learning. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference and Exposition, Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zeegers, P. (2004). Student learning in higher education: A path analysis of academic achievement in science. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(1), 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2000). University students' learning approaches in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs's 3P model. The Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 37–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar