Diverging Revenues, Cascading Expenditures, and Ensuing Subsidies: The Unbalanced and Growing Financial Strain of Intercollegiate Athletics on Universities and Their Students

References

• Anderson, M. (2012). The benefits of college athletics success: An application of the propensity score design with instrumental variables (Working paper No. 18196). National Bureau of Economics (NBER). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18196
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, R. & Feldman, D. (2011). Why does college cost so much? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Art & Science Group. (2011). Quantitative and Qualitative Research with Football Bowl Subdivision University Presidents on the Costs and Financing of Intercollegiate Athletics: Report of Findings and Implications. Baltimore: Art & Science Group. Retrieved from http://www.knightcommissionmedia.org/images/President_Survey_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. & Ma, J. (2010). Trends in college pricing, 2010. Washington, DC: The College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchet, A., & Hutchinson, M. (2010). Organizational escalation to an uncertain course of action: A case study of institutional branding at Southern Methodist University. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 3, 272–295.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchet, A., & Hutchinson, M. (2011). Organizational escalation and retreat in university athletics: Brand insulation in Birmingham-Southern College's transition to Division II athletics. Journal of Intercollegiate Sports, 4, 261–282.
   Google Scholar
• Cheslock, J. J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 208–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. (1993). Visualizing data. Murray Hill, NJ: AT&T Bell Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. (1994). The elements of graphing data. Murray Hill, NJ: AT&T Bell Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. (2011). Big time sports in American universities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, F. (1995). Measuring income inequality (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Denhart, M., & Vedder, R. (2010). Intercollegiate athletics subsidies: A regressive tax. Unpublished manuscript, Center for College Affordability, Ohio University, Athens, OH. Retrieved from http://www.centerforcollegeaffordability.org/uploads/ICA_Subsidies_RegressiveTax.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dexheimer, E. (2007, September 30). The Longhorn economy. Austin American Statesman. Retrieved from http://www.utexas.edu/research/pasp/publications/editorials/dexheimer.html
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (April): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnavent, K. (2004). The fifty-year seduction: How television manipulated college football, from the birth of the modern NCAA to the creation of the BCS. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, J., Trail, G., & Anderson, D. (2002). An examination of team identification: Which motives are most salient to its existence? International Sports Journal, 6(2), 195–207.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, R. (2010). An economic look at the sustainability of FBS athletic departments. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 3(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. (2004). Challenging the myth: A review of the links among college athletic success, student quality, and donations. Paper commissioned by the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. Retrieved from http://www.knightcommission.org/about?id=73
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. (2007) Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R., & Cook, P. (1995). The winner-take-all society: Why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R., Levine, A. and Dijk, O. (2010). Expenditure cascades (Social Science Research Network Working Paper). Retrieved from the Social Science Research Network website: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1690612
   Google Scholar
• Hovey, H. (1999). State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education Report Number 99–3. Retrieved from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/hovey/hovey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T., Orszag, P., & Gunter, D. (2003). State fiscal constraints and higher education spending: The role of Medicaid and the business cycle. Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Discussion Paper Number 11.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, K. (2013, January 17). Nowhere to turn. InsideHigherEd.com. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/17/moodys-report-calls-question-all-traditional-university-revenue-sources
   Google Scholar
• Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. (2010). Restoring the balance: Dollars, values and the future of college sports. Miami: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lifschitz, A., Sauder, M., & Stevens, M. (2011). Football: Field ordering and status marking in U.S. higher education. Unpublished manuscript, School of Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Peloquin, M. (2011). 2011 NCAA television revenue by conference. Collegesportsinfo. com. Retrieved from http://collegesportsinfo.com/2011/10/03/2011-television-revenue-by-conference
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Presidential Task Force on the Future of Division I Intercollegiate Athletics. (2006). The second century imperatives: Presidential leadership—institutional accountability. Indianapolis: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Riesman, D. (1956). Constraint and Variety in American Education. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., Trail, G., Dick, R. & Gillentine, A. (2005). Fans vs. spectators: An analysis of those who attend intercollegiate football games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14, 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• State Budget Crisis Task Force. (2012). Report of the state budget crisis task force. New York: State Budget Crisis Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B.M., & Ross, J. (1989). Understanding behavior in escalation situations. Science, 246, 216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, J. (2003). Football U: Spectator sports in the life of the American university. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann, D., & Branscombe, N. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 14, 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Weiberg, S., Upton, J., & Berkowitz, S. (2012, May 15). Texas overwhelms rivals in revenue and spending. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/story/2012–05-15/texas-athletics-spending-revenue/54960210/1
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, B., Ballou, J., & Asch, E. (2008). Mission and Money: Understanding the University. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. and Massy, W. (2005). Remaking the university: Market-smart and mission-centered. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbalist, A. (1999). Unpaid professionals: Commercialism and conflict in big-time college sports. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar