Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women

References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007028
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, N. W., Crawford, E. R., & Khalifa, M. (2016). Psychological heuristics and faculty of color: Racial battle fatigue and tenure/promotion. The Journal of Higher Education, 87, 890–919. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.11780891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C., & Rhoten, D. (2010). Integrating the social sciences: Theoretical knowledge, methodological tools, and practical applications (pp. 103–118). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328–348). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Cardozo, K. M. (2017). Academic labor: Who cares? Critical Sociology, 43(3), 405–428.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. (1976). What is this thing called science? Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. (2013). What is this thing called science? McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. doi:10.2307/800672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. (2017). Beyond respectability: The intellectual thought of race women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (2016). On intersectionality—A keynote. WOW 2016. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DW4HLgYPlA
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555–583. doi:10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the ‘legitimate’ knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35, 169–180. doi:10.1080/713845282
   Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. (2012). How is this paper philosophy? Comparative Philosophy, 3, 121.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2014). An indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. New York, NY: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J., Conley, V. M., & Schuster, J. H. (2016). The faculty factor: Reassessing the American academy in a turbulent era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Schuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transformation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, K. A. (2011). Race, gender, and bodily (mis) recognitions: Women of Color faculty experiences with White students in the college classroom. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 444–478. doi:10.1080/00221546.2011.11777212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedan, B. (1962). The feminine mystique. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2013). Women faculty departures from a striving institution: Between a rock and a hard place. Review of Higher Education, 36, 349–370. doi:10.1353/rhe.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, R. E., Croom, N. N., & Vasquez, P. L. (2011). ‘Am I going crazy?!’ A critical race analysis of doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44, 93–114. doi:10.1080/10665684.2011.539472
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. D. (2014). Framing faculty agency inside striving universities: An application of Bourdieu's theory of practice. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(2), 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. D. (2015). An acción approach to affirmative action: Hispanic-Serving Institutions as spaces for fostering epistemic justice. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 9(1).
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L. D., & Terosky, A. L. (2016). From the faculty perspective: Defining, earning, and maintaining legitimacy across academia. Teachers College Record, 18(6).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, K., Gibbs, K. D., Bennett, J., Staples, C., & Robinson, T. (2015). ‘Respect me for my science’: A Bordieuian analysis of women scientists’ interactions with faculty and socialization into science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21, 159–179. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011143
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30, 233–252.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Y Muhs, G., Niemann, Y. F., González, C. G., & Harris, A. P. (Eds.). (2012). Presumed incompetent: The intersection of race and class for women in academia. Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1998). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education, 87, 605–634. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.11777416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. A. (2012). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. A., & Frickel, S. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43–65. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Reisman, D. (2002). The academic revolution. New York, NY: Doubleday. (Original work published 1968)
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. T., & McCann, K. I. (2014). Women faculty of color: Stories behind the statistics. Urban Review, 46, 681–702. doi:10.1007/s11256-014-0275-8
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. S. (2011). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347, 262–265. doi:10.1126/science.1261375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1993). Review: Feminist standpoint and the problems of knowledge. Signs, 19, 201–212. doi:10.1086/494867
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, E., & Romero, M. (1998). ‘The department is very male, very White, very old, and very conservative’: The functioning of the hidden curriculum in graduate sociology departments. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 1–33. doi:10.17763/haer.68.1.1q3828348783j851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges, R. J., & Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 54, 123–144. doi:10.1080/00221546.1983.11778167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, K. R., Harris, H. E., & Berthoud, D. A. F. (2012). Present and unequal: A third-wave approach to voice parallel experiences in managing oppression and bias in the academy. In G. Gutiérrez Y Muhs, Y. F. Niemann, C. G. González, & A. P. Harris (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 78–92). Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monzó, L. D., & SooHoo, S. (2014). Translating the academy: Learning the racialized languages of academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7, 147–165. doi:10.1037/a0037400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, Y. F. (1999). The making of a token: A case study of stereotype threat, stigma, racism, and tokenism in academe. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 20, 111–134. doi:10.2307/3346994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26, 57–80. doi:10.1353/rhe.2002.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., & Nyunt, G. (2017). Constrained choices: A view of campus service inequality from annual faculty reports. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, M. (2016). In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasque, P., Carducci, R., Kuntz, A., & Gildersleeve, R. (2012). Qualitative inquiry for equity in higher education: Methodological innovations, implications, and interventions: Association for the Study of Higher Education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196. doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Posselt, J. R. (2016). Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posselt, J. R., Reyes, K. A., Slay, K. E., Kamirmura, A., & Porter, K. B. (2017). Equity efforts as boundary work: How symbolic and social boundaries shape access and inclusion in graduate education. Teachers College Record, 119(10), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., & Pfirman, S. (2006). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36, 56–75. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, F. (1990). The American college and university: A history. Athens: University of Georgia Press. (Original work published 1962)
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1987). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 7–13. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1974.tb00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G. (2017). Progress and paradox for women in US higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 812–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelman, E. V. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, C. A. (2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36, 14–24. doi:10.3102/0013189X06298008
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, C. S. (2013). Ebony & ivy: Race, slavery, and the troubled history of America’s universities. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Zambrana, R. E., Ray, R., Espino, M. M., Castro, C., Douthirt Cohen, B., & Eliason, J. (2015). ‘Don’t leave us behind’: The importance of mentoring for underrepresented minority faculty. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 40–72. doi:10.3102/0002831214563063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, M., & Dill, B. T. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331. doi:10.2307/3178416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar