406
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Boundary Work of Commercialists in Academe: Implications for Postdoctoral Training

Pages 503-526 | Received 07 Mar 2017, Accepted 08 Jan 2018, Published online: 04 Apr 2018

References

  • Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Berman, E. P. (2012a). Creating the market university. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Berman, E. P. (2012b). Field theories and the move toward the market in US academic science. In D. Hess & S. Frickel (Eds.), Fields of knowledge: Science, politics, and publics in the neoliberal age (pp. 193–222). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
  • Biscotti, D., Lacy, W., Glenna, L., & Welsh, R. (2012). Constructing ‘disinterested’ academic science. Politics & Society, 40, 273–308. doi:10.1177/0032329212441601
  • Bourdieu, P. (1981 [1975]). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. In C. Lemert (Ed.), French sociology: Rupture and renewal since 1968 (pp. 257–292). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Campbell, T., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and administrators’ attitudes towards potential conflicts of interests, commitment, and equity in university–industry relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 309–352. doi:10.1080/00221546.1999.11780766
  • Cantwell, B., & Lee, J. (2010). Unseen workers in the academic factory. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 490–517. doi:10.17763/haer.80.4.w54750105q78p451
  • Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2015). Rise of the postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 667–696. doi:10.1080/00221546.2015.11777379
  • Carnegie Foundation. (2010). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/descriptions/basic.php
  • Colyvas, J., & Powell, W. (2006). Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 305–353. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4
  • Dellinger, K., & Williams, C. W. (2002). The locker room and the dorm room: Workplace norms and the boundaries of sexual harassment in magazine editing. Social Problems, 49, 242–257. doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.2.242
  • Finlay, W., & Coverdill, J. E. (2002). Headhunters: Matchmaking in the labor market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012a). A political-cultural approach to the problem of strategic action. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 34, 287–316.
  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012b). A theory of fields. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Geiger, R. L., & Sá, C. (2012). Tapping the riches of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: DoubleDay Anchor Books.
  • Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools (NBER Working Paper No. 8498). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Johnson, D. R. (2017). A fractured profession: Commercialism and conflict in academic science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Kleinman, D. L., & Vallas, S. (2001). Science, capitalism, and the rise of the ‘knowledge worker.’ Theory and Society, 30, 451–492. doi:10.1023/A:1011815518959
  • Lam, A. (2010). From ‘ivory tower traditionalists’ to ‘entrepreneurial scientists’? Social Studies of Science, 40, 307–340. doi:10.1177/0306312709349963
  • Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 71–96. doi:10.1080/00221546.2007.11778964
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Miller, J. M., & Feldman, M. P. (2015). Isolated in the lab: Examining dissatisfaction with postdoctoral appointments. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 697–724. doi:10.1080/00221546.2015.11777380
  • Murray, F. (2010). The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 341–388. doi:10.1086/653599
  • National Science Foundation. (2006). Survey of graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
  • Owen-Smith, J. (2011). The institutionalization of expertise in university licensing. Theory and Society, 40(1), 63–84.
  • Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. In S. Vallas (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Work (pp. 109–140). New York, NY: JAI/Elsevier Press.
  • Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 544–568. doi:10.1080/00221546.2013.11777301
  • Rudd, E., Picciano, J., Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (2010). The influence of postdoctoral training on prestige and time in academic careers. Seattle, WA: Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education.
  • Slaughter, S., Archerd, C. J., & Campbell, T. (2004). Boundaries and quandaries. Review of Higher Education, 28, 129–165. doi:10.1353/rhe.2004.0032
  • Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Holleman, M., & Morgan, E. (2002). The ‘traffic’ in graduate students. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27, 282–312. doi:10.1177/016224390202700205
  • Slaughter, S., Feldman, M., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). U.S. research universities’ institutional conflict of interest policies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(3), 3–20. doi:10.1525/jer.2009.4.3.3
  • Smith-Doerr, L. (2006). Stuck in the middle: Doctoral education ranking and career outcomes for life scientists. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26, 243–255. doi:10.1177/0270467606289304
  • Stephan, P., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A., & Black, G. (2007). Who’s patenting in the university? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 71–99. doi:10.1080/10438590600982806
  • Su, X. (2013). The impacts of postdoctoral training on scientists’ academic employment. The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 239–265.
  • U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. Washington, DC: NCES.
  • Vallas, S., & Kleinman, D. (2008). Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy. Socio-Economic Review, 6, 283–311. doi:10.1093/ser/mwl035

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.