Testing an Intervention for Recognizing and Reporting Subtle Gender Bias in Promotion and Tenure Decisions

References

• Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins, P. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 438–459). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n22
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The perils of political correctness: Men’s and women’s responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 75–88. doi:10.1177/019027250506800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M., Tocci, M. J., & Williams, J. C. (2012). The language of performance evaluations: Gender-based shifts in content and consistency of judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 186–192. doi:10.1177/1948550611415693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R. (2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 202–230. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes, M., Devine, P. G., Isaac, C., Manwell, L. B., Ford, C. E., Byars-Winston, A., … Sheridan, J. (2012). Promoting institutional change through bias literacy. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5, 63–77. doi:10.1037/a0028128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (2015). Quick take: Women in academia. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-academia
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57, 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J., Eddy, P., Hart, J., Lester, J., Lukas, S., Eudey, B., … Madden, M. (2007). Improving gender equity in postsecondary education. In S. S. Klein, B. Richardson, D. A. Grayson, L. H. Fox, C. Kramarae, D. S. Pollard, … C. A. Dwyer (Eds.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed., pp. 631–653). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. M., & Hart, J. (2009). Playing soccer on the football field: The persistence of gender inequities for women faculty. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 473–488. doi:10.1080/10665680903284523
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637–646. doi:10.1007/BF00287694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundiff, J. L., Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 703–721. doi:10.1111/josi.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. W. (2011), April. Persistent inequity: Gender and academic employment. Paper prepared for “New Voices in Pay Equity,” an Event for Equal Pay Day (Association of American College and Universities). Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/08E023AB-E6D8-4DBD-99A0-24E5EB73A760/0/persistent_inequity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2013). The origins and effects of corporate diversity programs. In Q. M. Roberson (Ed.), Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 253–281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2009). Collective action in modern times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749–768. doi:10.1111/josi.2009.65.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fominykh, M., Leong, P., & Cartwright, B. (2017). Role-playing and experiential learning in a professional counseling distance course. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 1078–1090). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. L. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career women in STEM. Journal of Higher Education, 87, 605–634. doi:10.1353/jhe.2016.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. L., & Cress, C. M. (2008). Are women faculty just ‘worrywarts’? Accounting for gender differences in self-reported stress. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 17, 175–193. doi:10.1080/10911350802171120
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2008). Subjectivity in the appraisal process: A facilitator of gender bias in work settings. In E. Borgida & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom (pp. 127–155). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshfield, L. E., & Joseph, T. D. (2012). ‘We need a woman, we need a Black woman’: Gender, race, and identity taxation in the academy. Gender and Education, 24, 213–227. doi:10.1080/09540253.2011.606208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. L., Gaither, S. E., & Ratliff, K. A. (2015). Caught in the middle: Defensive responses to IAT feedback among Whites, Blacks, and Biracial Black/Whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 373–381. doi:10.1177/1948550614561127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 193–212. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, J. (2011). Regulating gender performances: Power and gender norms in faculty work. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 4, 142–169. doi:10.2202/1940-7890.1082
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, J. (1974). Political linkage: The academic innovation process. The Journal of Higher Education, 45, 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, R. W. (2013, February 28). Gender, race, and leadership: An examination of the challenges facing non-prototypical leaders. Paper presented at the Gender & Work Research Symposium: Challenging Conventional Wisdom, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O’Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschke, R., Laursen, S., Nielsen, J. M., & Rankin, P. (2007). Demographic inertia revisited: An immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 1–26. doi:10.1080/00221546.2007.11778961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male–female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51, 157–158. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Alemán, A. M. (2014). Managerialism as the ‘new’ discursive masculinity in the university. Feminist Formations, 26, 107–134. doi:10.1353/ff.2014.0017
   Google Scholar
• Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1678–1712. doi:10.1037/apl0000022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchneck, B., Smith, J., & Latimer, M. (2016). A recipe for change: Creating a more inclusive academy. Science, 352, 148–149. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6282/148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 215–233. doi:10.1017/S1537592708080572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Van Der Toorn, J., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2014). Scientific diversity interventions. Science, 343, 615–616. doi:10.1126/science.1245936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhs, G. G., Niemann, Y. F., González, C. G., & Harris, A. P. (2012). Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., … Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, L. T., Kinias, Z., & Major, B. (2008). How status and stereotypes impact attributions to discrimination: The stereotype-asymmetry hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 405–412. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Jackson, R., & Waugaman, C. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 1154–1186. doi:10.3102/0002831217716767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallee, M., Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2016). Can anyone have it all? Gendered views on parenting and academic careers. Innovative Higher Education, 41(3), 187–202. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9345-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Postmes, T. (2003). Women’s emotional responses to the pervasiveness of gender discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 297–312. doi:10.1002/ejsp.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevo, R., & Chubin, D. E. (2008). Bias literacy: A review of concepts in research on discrimination. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Center for Science & Engineering Capacity.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A., McCormick, C., Diciccio, E., & Zawadzki, M. J. (in press). Demonstrating the cumulative effects of unconscious bias with WAGES-Academic (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation): Short and long-term impact on faculty and administrators. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A., Zawadzki, M. J., & Johnson, R. N. (2011). The impact of the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic) in demonstrating cumulative effects of gender bias. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 120–129. doi:10.1037/a0022953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. D., & Flynn, P. M. (2007). Moving innovations into treatment: A stage-based approach to program change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L., Handley, I. M., Zale, A. V., Rushing, S., & Potvin, M. A. (2015). Now hiring! Empirically testing a three-step intervention to increase faculty gender diversity in STEM. BioScience, 65, 1084–1087. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509–528. doi:10.1023/A:1018839203698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. L., Latu, I. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Denney, H. T. (2010). Yes we can! Prejudice reduction through seeing (inequality) and believing (in social change). Psychological Science, 21, 1557–1562. doi:10.1177/0956797610385354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments about sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C. S. V., Gonzalez, J. C., & Wong, K. (2011). Faculty women of color: The critical nexus of race and gender. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 199–211. doi:10.1037/a0024630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Digest of education statistics: Table 315.10. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_315.10.asp
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., & Wolf‐Wendel, L. E. (2005). Work and family perspectives from research university faculty. New Directions for Higher Education, 2005(130), 67–80. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0741
   Google Scholar
• Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387, 341–343. doi:10.1038/387341a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C. (2014). Hacking tech’s diversity problem. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2012). How to talk about gender inequity in the workplace: Using WAGES as an experiential learning tool to reduce reactance and promote self-efficacy. Sex Roles, 67, 605–616. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0181-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawadzki, M. J., Shields, S. A., Danube, C. L., & Swim, J. K. (2014). Reducing the endorsement of sexism using experiential learning: The Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation (WAGES). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 75–92. doi:10.1177/0361684313498573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar