What are We Talking About When We Talk About Holistic Review? Selective College Admissions and its Effects on Low-SES Students

References

• Atkinson, R. C. (2001). Standardized tests and access to American universities. Retrieved from http://www.rca.ucsd.edu/speeches/satspch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. C. (2005). College admissions and the SAT: A personal perspective. APA Observer, 18, 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Barron’s. (2013). Profiles of American colleges 2014 (31st ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2009). U.S. News & World Report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation. American Journal of Education, 116( 2), 163–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2017). Improving admission of low-SES students at selective colleges: Results from an experimental simulation. Educational Researcher, 46, 67–77. doi:10.3102/0013189X17699373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N., & Flaster, A. (2014). Conceptual and methodological problems in research on college undermatch. Educational Researcher, 43, 93–99. doi:10.3102/0013189X14523039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N., Howard, J. E., & Flaster, A. (2016). Holistic admissions after affirmative action: Does ‘maximizing’ the high school curriculum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 389–409. doi:10.3102/0162373716642407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 318–339. doi:10.3102/0162373711406718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. D., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., & Perna, L. W. (2009). College knowledge of 9th and 11th grade students: Variation by school and state context. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 663–685. doi:10.1080/00221546.2009.11779039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Getting on the front page: Organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U.S. News and World Report on student decisions. Research in Higher Education, 50, 415–436. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9129-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, E. C. (1903). A historical and critical discussion of college admission requirements. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clinedinst, M., Koranteng, A.-M., & Nicola, T. (2016). State of college admission 2015. Alexandria, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (2002). Best practices in admissions decisions. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, F. E. (2005). The reconstruction of merit post-Proposition 209. Educational Policy, 19, 371–395. doi:10.1177/0895904804274055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., & Allen, D. J. (2011). Uncontrolled destinies: Improving opportunity for low-income students in American higher education. Research in Higher Education, 52, 786–807. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9222-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, M. E., & Wolniak, G. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 132–153. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9150-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, L. L., Gaertner, M. N., & Orfield, G. (2015). Race, class, and college access. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. 136 S.Ct. 2198 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. L. (2013). Playing to win. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaertner, M. N., & Hart, M. (2013). Considering class: College access and diversity. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 7, 367–403.
   Google Scholar
• Gratz v. Bollinger. 539 U.S. 344 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grutter v. Bollinger. 539 U.S. 306, 330 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, D., Berrey, E., & Rose-Greenland, F. (2016). Dequantifying diversity: Affirmative action and admissions at the University of Michigan. Theory and Society, 45, 265–301. doi:10.1007/s11186-016-9270-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, M. M. (2014). Navigating the road to college: Race and class variation in the college application process. Sociology Compass, 8, 1191–1205. doi:10.1111/soc4.12203
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Killgore, L. M. (2009). Merit and competition in selective college admissions. Review of Higher Education, 32, 469–488. doi:10.1353/rhe.0.0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemann, N. (1999). The big test. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. doi:10.3102/0013189X017002013
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods, 16, 243–264. doi:10.1177/1525822X04266831
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M. (1994). Buying and selling higher education: The social construction of the college applicant. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 427–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., & Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39, 513–537. doi:10.1023/A:1018797521946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. J., & Becks, A. H. (2015). Who benefits from SAT prep? An examination of high school context and race/ethnicity. Review of Higher Education, 39, 1–23. doi:10.1353/rhe.2015.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posselt, J. R., Jaquette, O., Bielby, R., & Bastedo, M. N. (2012). Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 1074–1111. doi:10.3102/0002831212439456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusser, B. (2001). The contemporary politics of access policy: California after Proposition 209. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy (pp. 121–152). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., & McGuire, K. (in press). More classes, more access? understanding the effects of course offerings on Black–White gaps in advanced placement course-taking. Review of Higher Education.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Pender, M., & Howell, J. (2013). The full extent of student-college academic undermatch. Economics of Education Review, 32, 247–261. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2015). Digest of education statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Stampnitzky, L. (2006). How does ‘culture’ become ‘capital’? Cultural and institutional struggles over ‘character and personality’ at Harvard. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 461–481. doi:10.1525/sop.2006.49.4.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. L. (2009). Creating a class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (2014). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stulberg, L. M., & Chen, A. S. (2014). The origins of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate admissions: A comparative analysis of institutional change in higher education. Sociology of Education, 87, 36–52. doi:10.1177/0038040713514063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633–642. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synnott, M. G. (1979). The half-opened door. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Traub, J. (1999, May 2). The class of Prop. 209. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1999/05/02/magazine/the-class-of-prop-209.html
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, H. S. (1977). The qualified student. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weininger, E. B., Lareau, A., & Conley, D. (2015). What money doesn’t buy: Class resources and children’s participation in organized extracurricular activities. Social Forces, 94, 479–503. doi:10.1093/sf/sov071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, L., Cipollone, K., & Jenkins, H. (2014). Class warfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weissbourd, R. (2016). Turning the tide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar