Bobbing for Bad Apples: Accreditation, Quantitative Performance Measures, and the Identification of Low-Performing Colleges

References

• 20 U.S.C. § 1099b(a)(5) (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. T. (2017). The seven silos of accountability in higher education: Systematizing multiple logics and fields. Research and Practice in Assessment, 11, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. C. (2005). The many faces of accountability. In J. C. Burke (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education (pp. 1–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Hanover, NH: The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B. G., & Espeland, W. N. (1991). Accounting for rationality: Double-entry bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 31–69. doi:10.1086/229739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. (2007). The measure of merit: Talents, intelligence, and inequality in the French and American Republics, 1750-1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Complete College America. (2009). http://www.completecollege.org
   Google Scholar
• Dafny, L., & Dranove, D. (2008). Do report cards tell consumers anything they don’t already know? The case of Medicare HMOs. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3), 790–821. doi:10.1111/rand.2008.39.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, D. J., & Figlio, D. (2016). Accountability in US education: Applying lessons from K–12 experience to higher education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 33–55. doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. S., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V. (2014). Performance funding for higher education: Forms, origins, impacts, and futures. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 163–184. doi:10.1177/0002716214541042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J. S. (2015). An overview of U.S. Accreditation. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fain, P. (2013, March 21). Now what?. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com
   Google Scholar
• Fain, P. (2016, June 21). Scorecard for accreditors. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com
   Google Scholar
• Field, K. (2014, January 22). Public-university group offers alternative to Obama’s college-rating plan. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessman (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 383–421). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Kenny, L. W. (2009). Public sector performance measurement and stakeholder support. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9–10), 1069–1077. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, A. (2016). Watching the watchdogs: A look at what happens when accreditors sanction colleges. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A. (2017, May 30). Accreditation is broken. Time to repair it. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. (2011). Cents and sensibility: Economic valuation and the nature of “nature.” American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1721–1777. doi:10.1086/659640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, D. G., & Frederickson, H. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. A. (1883). Some impressions of the United States. London, UK: Longmans, Green, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2014). Education should strengthen oversight of schools and accreditors. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Harcleroad, F. F. (1980). Accreditation—History, process, and problems (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J. S., & Weinstein, J. M. (2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., McLendon, M. K., & Mokher, C. G. (2008). Accounting for student success: An empirical analysis of the origins and spread of state student unit-record systems. Research in Higher Education, 49(8), 665–668. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9101-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegji, A. (2014). An overview of accreditation of higher education in the United States (CRS Report No. R43826). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, N. W. (2014). College on credit: A multilevel analysis of student loan default. The Review of Higher Education, 37(2), 168–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchen, R. (2018). Higher education accountability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchen, R., & Li, A. (2017). Institutional accountability: A comparison of the predictors of student loan repayment and default rates. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 671, 202–223. doi:10.1177/0002716217701681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. P., & James, K. (2014). Making the higher education market work for students and taxpayers. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, D. (2017, October 12). The new, improved IPEDS. Inside Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24. doi:10.3102/01623737028001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, T. M. (2012). Accountability in higher education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 675–700. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Evaluating Accreditation’s Role in Ensuring Quality. (2015). Hearing of the committee on health, education, labor, and pensions. 114th Cong. 11. (testimony of Peter T. Ewell). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, F. (1960). The American college and university: A history. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., Bailey, T., & Kienzl, G. (2006). Relative success? Determinants of college graduation rates in public and private colleges in the U.S. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 249–279. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9388-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford, M. (2015, November 17). Challenges of an accreditor breakdown. Inside Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: Audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. doi:10.1017/S1062798700002660
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W. (2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Education Finance, 39(3), 222–243.
   Google Scholar
• The Triad: Promoting a System of Shared Responsibility. (2013). Issues for Reauthorization of the higher education act. Hearing of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, 113th Cong. 64 (testimony of Marshall A. Hill). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D., Meyer, H. D., Labaree, D. F., & Hutt, E. L. (2014). Accountability: Antecedents, power, and processes. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2014). A new system of college ratings – invitation to comment. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/documents/college-
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of US higher education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zumeta, W. (1998). Public university accountability to the state in the late twentieth century: Time for a rethinking? Review of Policy Research, 15(4), 5–22. doi:10.1111/ropr.1998.15.issue-4
   Google Scholar