References
- Adelphi Libraries. (2019). Evaluating information sources. Adelphi University. https://libguides.adelphi.edu/evaluating-sources/abc
- American Association of State Colleges and Universities. (n.d.). Digital polarization initiative. https://www.aascu.org/AcademicAffairs/ADP/DigiPo/
- Baer, A., & Kipnis, D. G. (2020, May 7–9). SIFTing and four-moving online: Opportunities and challenges with teaching lateral reading through an online module [ Paper presentation]. LOEX Conference 2020, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
- Blakeslee, S. (2004). The CRAAP Test. LOEX Quarterly, 31(3), 6–7. https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4
- Boston College Libraries. (n.d.). Evaluating internet sources: Currency. https://web.archive.org/web/20200220060337/https://libguides.bc.edu/c.php?g=44018&p=279573
- Brandeis Library. (n.d.). Evaluating online information. Brandeis University. https://guides.library.brandeis.edu/evaluatinginfo/web-and-social-media
- Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M., Ortega, T., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718762419
- Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Connors, P., Ortega, T., Kerr, D., & Wineburg, S. (2021). Lateral reading: College students learn to critically evaluate Internet sources in an online course. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-56
- Brigham Young University Library. (n.d.). Step-by-step guide & research rescue: Evaluating credibility. https://web.archive.org/web/20200703223355/https://guides.lib.byu.edu/c.php?g=216340&p=1428399%20
- Brodsky, J. E., Brooks, P. J., Scimeca, D., Todorova, R., Galati, P., Batson, M., Grosso, R., Matthews, M., Miller, V., & Caulfield, M. (2021). Improving college students’ fact-checking strategies through lateral reading instruction in a general education civics course. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(23), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00291-4
- Campus Compact. (n.d.). Presidents’ declaration on the civic responsibility of higher education. https://kdp0l43vw6z2dlw631ififc5-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/large/2009/02/Presidents-Declaration.pdf
- Caulfield, M. (2018, September 14). A short history of CRAAP. Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2018/09/14/a-short-history-of-craap/
- Chittum, R. (2013, September 5). The minimum wage and the Danish Big Mac. Columbia Journalism Review. https://archives.cjr.org/the_audit/the_minimum_wage_and_the_danis.php
- Choi, W., & Stvilia, B. (2015). Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2399–2414. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23543
- Choi, M. (2020, October 11). When Gen Z is the source of the misinformation it consumes. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/11/gen-z-misinformation-politics-news-conspiracy-423913
- Colby, A., Beaumont, E., Ehrlich, T., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility (Vol. 6). John Wiley & Sons.
- Cornell University Library. (n.d.). Introduction to research. https://web.archive.org/web/20200220055353/https://www.library.cornell.edu/research/introduction
- Dissen, A., Qadiri, Q., & Middleton, C. J. (2021). I read it online: Understanding how undergraduate students assess the accuracy of online sources of health information. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827621990574
- Evans, B. J., Marsicano, C. R., & Lennartz, C. J. (2019). Cracks in the bedrock of American democracy: Differences in civic engagement across institutions of higher education. Educational Researcher, 48(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18809053
- Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2020). Source credibility. In J. Van den Bulck (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media psychology (pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0289
- Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. DUX ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997097
- Gambetta, D. (2017). Signaling. In P. Bearman & P. Hedström (Eds.), Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford University Press. (pp. 168–194). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.8
- Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
- Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
- Gillin, J. (2017, March 3). Reports that Donald Trump's unsecured Android phone is root of White House leaks are made up. Fake! Politifact. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/mar/03/theseattletribunecom/reports-donald-trumps-unsecured-android-phone-root/
- Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of Web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/636/423
- Harvard College Writing Program. (n.d.). Harvard guide to using sources. Harvard University. https://web.archive.org/web/20200930182834/https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/evaluating-web-sources
- Head, A., Wihbey, J., Metaxas, P. T., MacMillan, M., & Cohen, D. (2018). How students engage with news: Five takeaways for educators, journalists, and librarians. Project Information Literacy Research Institute. https://projectinfolit.org/pil-public-v1/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/newsreport.pdf
- Hesburgh Libraries. (n.d.). Pot of gold library research and information literacy tutorial: Evaluating. University of Notre Dame. https://web.archive.org/web/20200220060621/https://potofgold.library.nd.edu/evaluating/?page=7
- Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
- Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
- Iding, M. K., Crosby, M. E., Auernheimer, B., & Klemm, B. (2009). Web site credibility: Why do people believe what they believe? Instructional Science, 37, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9080-7
- Internal Revenue Service. (2020). Internal revenue service data book, 2019. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p55b.pdf
- Kight, S. W. (2020, September 15). Gen Z is eroding the power of misinformation. Axios. https://www.axios.com/gen-z-is-eroding-the-power-of-misinformation-5940e3cd-e3d0-44a1-b66c-93be45fe1d2c.html
- Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
- Lim, S. (2020). Academic library guides for tackling fake news: A content analysis. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102195
- Lipton, E. (2014, February 9). Fight over minimum wage illustrates web of industry ties. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/10/us/politics/fight-over-minimum-wage-illustrates-web-of-industry-ties.html
- List, A., Grossnickle, E. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Undergraduate students’ justifications for source selection in a digital academic context. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 22–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115606659
- Lurie, E., & Mustafaraj, E. (2018). Investigating the effects of Google’s search engine result page in evaluating the credibility of online news sources. Proceedings on the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3201064.3201095
- MacPháidín Library. (n.d.). Using lateral reading to evaluate online information. Stonehill College. https://libguides.stonehill.edu/lateral
- Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P., & Lavranos, C. (2020). A study of higher education students’ self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1413–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041
- McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
- McGrew, S., Smith, M., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., & Wineburg, S. (2019). Improving university students’ web savvy: An intervention study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12279
- Meriam Library. (2010, September 17). Evaluating information—applying the CRAAP Test. California State University. https://library.csuchico.edu/sites/default/files/craap-test.pdf
- Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20672
- Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
- Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2015). Psychological approaches to credibility assessment online. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, Wiley. (pp. 445–466). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456
- Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2002). Building citizenship: How student voice in service‐learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00014
- The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/crucible/Crucible_508F.pdf
- Neklason, A. (2019, July 1). Philanthropy serves the status quo. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/07/philanthropy-serves-status-quo/593089/
- Northwestern Libraries. (n.d.). Evaluating sources (archive): Evaluating websites. Northwestern University. https://libguides.northwestern.edu/c.php?g=119278&p=946214
- Ontell, V. (2009). The ABC’s of evaluating web sites. San Diego Mesa College. http://www.sdmesa.edu/library/documents/Mesa-Library-Research-Instructions-Evaluating-Websites.pdf
- Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x
- Penn State University Libraries. (n.d.). Evaluating information rubric. Pennsylvania State University. https://web.archive.org/web/20200930185611/https://libraries.psu.edu/research/how/evaluating-information-rubric
- Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
- Public Interest Registry. (n.d.). Public interest registry dashboard: January through June 2013. https://docplayer.net/13026868-Public-interest-registry-dashboard.html
- Randall, D. (2017). Making citizens: How American universities teach civics. National Association of Scholars. https://www.nas.org/storage/app/media/Reports/Making%20Citizens/NAS_makingCitizens_fullReport.pdf
- Reich, R., Dorn, L., & Sutton, S. (2009). Anything goes: Approval of nonprofit status by the IRS. Stanford University Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society. https://pacscenter.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Anything-Goes-PACS-11-09.pdf
- Savannah Technical College. (n.d.). Evaluating websites. https://www.savannahtech.edu/student-affairs/evaluating-websites/
- Sax, L. J. (2004). Citizenship development and the American college student. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004(122), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.110
- Sharun, S., & Smith, E. E. (2020). Educational development partnerships and practices: Helping librarians move beyond the one-shot. College & Research Libraries News, 81(9), 445. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.81.9.445
- Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. Wiley.
- Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest. Johns Hopkins University Press, (pp. 37–52).
- Stanford History Education Group. (2019). SHEG research note: Dot-orgs and hate groups. https://purl.stanford.edu/vt471sv7857
- Stroup, J. T., Bunting, H., Dodson, K., Horne, M., & Portilla, J. (2013). Promoting a deliberative and active citizenry: Developing traditional first year college student political engagement. College Teaching, 61(4), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.809327
- Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
- United States Department of Education. (2012). Advancing civic learning and engagement in democracy: A road map and call to action. https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/road-map-call-to-action.pdf
- University of Illinois Library. (n.d.). Evaluate your sources. https://www.library.illinois.edu/ugl/howdoi/evaluate_sources/
- University of Louisville Libraries. (n.d.). Citizen literacy. https://library.louisville.edu/citizen-literacy/home
- University of Washington Libraries. (n.d.). Savvy info consumers: Internet domains. https://web.archive.org/web/20200925202604/https://guides.lib.uw.edu/research/evaluate/domains
- Whitehead, J. L. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636809382870
- Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333183
- Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102
- Wineburg, S., & Ziv, N. (2019, December 5). The meaninglessness of the .org domain. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/05/opinion/dot-org-domain.html
- Young, E. (2015). How millennials get news: Inside the habits of America’s first digital generation. NORC Center for Public Affairs Research & American Press Institute. http://www.mediainsight.org/PDFs/Millennials/Millennials%20Report%20FINAL.pdf