Comparison between a coupled 1D-2D model and a fully 2D model for supercritical flow simulation in crossroads

References

• Bates, P.D., & De Roo, A. (2000). A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 236, 54–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00278-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladé, E., Gómez, M., & Dolz, J. (1994). Quasi-two dimensional modelling of flood routing in rivers and flood plains by means of storage cells. Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling of flood propagation over initially dry areas, Milan, 156–170.
   Google Scholar
• Bladé, E., Gómez-Valentín, M., Dolz, J., Aragón-Hernández, J.L., Corestein, G., & Sánchez-Juny, M. (2012). Integration of 1D and 2D finite volume schemes for computations of water flow in natural channels. Advances in Water Research, 42, 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carniello, L., D'Alpaos, L., Defina, A., & Martini, P. (2003). A finite element model for the hydrodynamics of shallow water tidal basins based on coupling of 2D and 1D elements. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Research and Safeguarding of Venice, Venice, 465–479.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, N.B. (2006). Numerical simulation of supercritical flow in open channel (master's thesis). University Technology, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Cunge, J.A. (1975). Two-dimensional modelling of flood plains. In K. Mahmood & V. Yevjevich (Eds.), Unsteady flow in open channels (pp. 705–762). Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar
• D'Alpaos, L., & Defina, A. (1993). Venice lagoon hydrodynamics simulation by coupling 2D and 1D finite element models. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Finite Elements in Fluids – New Trends and Applications, Barcelona, 917–926.
   Google Scholar
• D'Alpaos, L., & Defina, A. (2007). Mathematical modeling of tidal hydrodynamics in shallow lagoons: a review of open issues and applications to the Venice lagoon. Computers & Geosciences, 33, 476–496. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defina, A., D'Alpaos, L., & Matticchio, B. (1995). A coupled 2D and 1D finite element model for simulating tidal flow in the Venice channel network. In M. Morand Cecchii, K. Morgan, J. Periaux, B.A. Schrefler, & O. Zienkiewicz (Eds.). IX International Conference on Finite Elements in Fluids – New Trends and Applications, Venice, 1397–1406.
   Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G., Castellarin, A., Montanari, A., & Brath, A. (2009). Probability-weighted hazard maps for comparing different flood risk management strategies: a case study. Natural Hazards, 50, 479–496. doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9355-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Nieto, E.D., Marin, J., & Monnier, J. (2010). Coupling superposed 1D and 2D shallow-water models: Source terms in finite volume schemes. Computers & Fluids, 39, 1070–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Navarro, P., & Savirón, J.M. (1992). Numerical simulation of unsteady flow at open channel junctions. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 30, 595–609. doi: 10.1080/00221689209498882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gejadze, I., & Monnier, J. (2007). On a 2D “zoom” for the 1D shallow water model: coupling and data assimilation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and. Engineering, 196, 4628–4643. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghostine, R., Kesserwani, G., Vazquez, J., Rivière, N., Ghenaim, A., & Mosé, R. (2009). Simulation of supercritical flow in crossroads: Confrontation of a 2D and 3D numerical approaches to experimental results. Computers & Fluids, 38, 425–432. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghostine, R., Vazquez, J., Nicolas, R., Terfous, A., Ghenaim, A., & Mose, R. (2013). A comparative study of the 1D and 2D approaches for simulation of flows at right angled dividing junctions. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, 5070–5082. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.11.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghostine, R., Vazquez, J., Terfous, A., Mose, R., & Ghenaim, A. (2012). Comparative study of 1D and 2D flow simulations at open-channel junctions. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50, 164–170. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2012.661563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisonni, C., & Hager, W.H. (2002). Supercritical flow in the 90° junction manhole. Urban Water Journal, 4, 363–372. doi: 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00003-1
   Google Scholar
• Goudarzizadeh, R., Hedayat, N., & Jahromi, S. (2010). Three-dimensional simulation of flow pattern at the lateral intake in straight path, using finite-volume method. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 47, 656–661.
   Google Scholar
• Gurram, S.K., Karki, K.S., & Hager, W.H. (1997). Subcritical junction flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 123, 447–455. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:5(447)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, W.H. (1989). Supercritical flow in channel junctions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 115, 595–615. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:5(595)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horritt, M.S., & Bates, P.D. (2001). Predicting floodplain inundation: raster-based modeling versus the finite-element approach. Hydrological Processes, 15, 825–842. doi: 10.1002/hyp.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.C., Lee, W.J., Shieh, M.Y., & Tang, C.J. (2002). Subcritical 90° equal-width open-channel dividing flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128, 716–720. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:7(716)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Weber, L.J., & Lai, Y.G. (2002). Three dimensional numerical study of flows in open channel junctions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128, 268–280. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:3(268)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Rauberg, J., Apel, H., & Lindenschmidt, K.E. (2007). The effectiveness of polder systems on peak discharge capping of floods along the middle reaches of the Elbe River in Germany. Hydrology and Earth Systems Sciences, 4, 211–241. doi: 10.5194/hessd-4-211-2007
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, N., Bates, P., Horritt, M., & Wilson, M. (2007). Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation. Geomorphology, 90, 208–225. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesserwani, G., Ghostine, R., Vazquez, J., Mosé, R., Abdallah, M., & Ghenaim, A. (2008). Simulation of subcritical flow at open-channel junction. Advances in Water Resources, 31, 287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, J., & Monnier, J. (2009). Superposition of local zoom models and simultaneous calibration for 1D–2D shallow water flows. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 80, 547–560. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignot, E., Paquier, A., & Rivière, N. (2008). Experimental and numerical modeling of symmetrical four-branch supercritical cross junction flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 46, 723–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Hernández, M., García-Navarro, P., Burguete, J., & Brufau, P. (2013). A conservative strategy to couple 1D and 2D models for shallow water flow simulation. Computers & Fluids, 81, 26–44. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nania, L.S., Gomez, M., & Dolz, J. (2004). Experimental study of the dividing flow in steep street crossings. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 42, 406–412. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2004.9728406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neary, V.S., Sotiropoulos, F., & Odgaard, J. (1999). Three-dimensional numerical model of lateral-intake inflows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125, 126–140. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:2(126)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, P.L. (1981). Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 43, 357–372. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong, W., & Mao, Z. (2003). Numerical simulation of open-channel flow in 90-degree combining junction. Journal of Tsinghua Science and Technology, 8, 713–718.
   Google Scholar
• Shabayek, S., Steffler, P., & Hicks, F. (2002). Dynamic model for subcritical combining flows in channel junctions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128, 821–828. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:9(821)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamloo, H., & Pirzadeh, B. (2007). Investigation of characteristics of separation zones in T-junctions. Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Cairo, Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Shettar, A.S., & Murthy, K.K. (1996). A numerical study of division of flow in open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 34, 651–675. doi: 10.1080/00221689609498464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, A. (2001). Latest development in floodplain modelling-1D/2D integration. Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Hydraulics in Civil Engineering, Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, I., & Wright, N.G. (2006). Linking Riemann and storage cell models for flood prediction. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Water Management, 159(1), 27–33.
   Google Scholar