Modelling of flexible aquatic plants from silicone syntactic foams

References

• Ackermann, J., & Damrath, V. (1989). Chemie und Technologie der Silicone II. Herstellung und Verwendung von Siliconpolymeren. Chemie in unserer Zeit, 23(3), 86–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ciuz.19890230304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmick, A. K., & Stephens, H. L. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of elastomers: Second edition, revised and expanded. Marcel Dekker AG.
   Google Scholar
• Budov, V. V. (1994). Hollow glass microspheres. Use, properties, and technology (review). Glass and Ceramics, 51(7-8), 230–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680655
   Google Scholar
• Carollo, F. G., Ferro, V., & Termini, D. (2002). Flow velocity measurements in vegetated channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(7), 664–673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:7(664)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Zhao, J., Ren, J., Rong, L., & Advincula, R. C. (2019). 3D printing multifunctional, hyperelastic silicone rubber foam. Advanced Functional Materials, 29(23), 1900469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Ortiz, A., Zong, L., & Nepf, H. (2012). The wake structure behind a porous obstruction and its implications for deposition near a finite patch of emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research, 48(9), W09517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacchia, L., van de Koppel, J., van der Wal, D., Wharton, G., Puijalon, S., & Bouma, T. J. (2018). Landscapes of facilitation: How self-organized patchiness of aquatic macrophytes promotes diversity in streams. Ecology, 99(4), 832–847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frostick, L., McLelland, S., & Merser, T. (Eds.). (2011). Users guide to physical modelling and experimentation. CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, M., Terwagne, D., Reis, P. M., & Nepf, H. (2015). Fabrication of flexible blade models from a silicone-based polymer to test the effect of surface corrugations on drag and blade motion. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 13(11), 630–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaylord, B., & Denny, M. W. (1997). Flow and flexibility. I. Effects of size, shape and stiffness in determining wave forces on the stipitate kelps Eisenia arborea and Pterygorhora californica. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200, 3141–3164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gent, A. N. (1958). On the relation between indentation hardness and young’s modulus. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 31(4), 896–906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3542351
   Google Scholar
• Ghisalberti, M., & Nepf, H. M. (2002). Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(C2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grutters, B. M. C., Pollux, B. J. A., Verberk, W. C. E. P., & Bakker, E. S. (2015). Native and non-native plants provide similar refuge to invertebrate prey, but less than artificial plants. PLoS One, 10(4), e0124456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, J. (2005). Effect of submerged flexible vegetation on flow structure and resistance. Journal of Hydrology, 307(1-4), 233–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouwen, N., & Unny, T. E. (1973). Flexible roughness in open channels. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 99(5), 713–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0003643
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, J., & Studer, M. (2006). Determining the modulus of elasticity in compression via the shore a hardness. Kunststoffe, 6, 92–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, J. R., & Wyllie-Echeverria, S. (2011). The influence of current speed and vegetation density on flow structure in two macrotidal eelgrass canopies. Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments, 1, 38–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/21573698-1152489
   Google Scholar
• Luhar, M., & Nepf, H. (2011). Flow induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnology and Oceanography, 56(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miler, O., Albayrak, I., Nikora, V., & O’Hare, M. (2014). Biomechanical properties and morphological characteristics of lake and river plants: Implications for adaptations to flow conditions. Aquatic Sciences, 76(4), 465–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0347-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepf, H. (2012). Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 50(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.696559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikora, N., Nikora, V., & O’Donoghue, T. (2013). Velocity profiles in vegetated open-channel flows: Combined effects of multiple mechanisms. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(10), 1021–1032. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikora, V. (2010). Hydrodynamics of aquatic ecosystems: An interface between ecology, biomechanics and environmental fluid mechanics. River Research and Applications, 26(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hare, M. T. O., Hutchinson, K. A., & Clarke, R. T. (2007). The drag and reconfiguration experienced by five macrophytes from a lowland river. Aquatic Botany, 86(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, T., Nezu, I., & Sanjou, M. (2016). Flow-vegetation interactions: Length-scale of the “monami” phenomenon. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 54(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2016.1146803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, A. C., Ashton, A., & Nepf, H. (2013). Mean and turbulent velocity fields near rigid and flexible plants and the implications for deposition. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118(4), 2585–2599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, C. M., Naiman, R. J., Bretschko, G., Karr, J. R., Oswood, M. W., Webster, J. R., Welcomme, R. L., & Winterbourn, M. J. (1988). Patch dynamics in lotic systems: The stream as a mosaic. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7(4), 503–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1467303
   Google Scholar
• Puijalon, S., & Bornette, G. (2006). Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: Biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species. American Journal of Botany, 93(8), 1090–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.8.1090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puijalon, S., Bouma, T. J., Douady, C. J., van Groenendael, J., Anten, N. P. R., Martel, E., & Bornette, G. (2011). Plant resistance to mechanical stress: Evidence of an avoidance-tolerance trade-off. New Phytologist, 191(4), 1141–1149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03763.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puijalon, S., Lena, J. P., Riviere, N., Champagne, J. Y., Rostan, J. C., & Bornette, G. (2007). Phenotypic plasticity in response to mechanical stress: Hydrodynamic performance and fitness of four aquatic plants species. New Phytologist, 177(4), 907–917. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puterman, M., Narkis, M., & Kenig, S. (1980). Syntactic foams I. Preparation, structure and properties. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 16(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955X8001600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rominger, J., Lightbody, A., & Nepf, H. (2010). The effects of vegetation on sand bar stability and stream hydrodynamics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136(12), 994–1002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rominger, J., & Nepf, H. (2014). Effects of blade flexural rigidity on drag force and mass transfer rates in model blades. Limnology and Oceanography, 59(6), 2028–2041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.6.2028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand-Jensen, K. (2003). Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes. Freshwater Biology, 48(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.00998.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand-Jensen, K. (2008). Drag forces on common plant species in temperate streams: Consequences of morphology, velocity and biomass. Hydrobiologia, 610(1), 307–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9446-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand-Jensen, K., & Pedersen, O. (1999). Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte stands in streams. Freshwater Biology, 42(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.444495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoneboom, T., Aberle, J., Wilson, C. A. M. E., & Dittrich, A. (2008, September 8–12). Drag force measurements of vegetation elements [Paper presentation]. 8th international conference on hydro-science and engineering (ICHE 2008), Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Shucksmith, J. D., Boxall, J. B., & Guymer, I. (2010). Effects of emergent and submerged natural vegetation on longitudinal mixing in open channel flow. Water Resources Research, 46(4), W04504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siniscalchi, F., & Nikora, V. I. (2012). Flow-plant interactions in open-channel flows: A comparative analysis of five freshwater plant species. Water Resources Research, 48(5), W05503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolov, A., & Sukhodolova, T. (2010). Case Study: Effect of submerged aquatic plants on turbulence structure in a lowland river. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136(7), 434–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolov, A., & Sukhodolova, T. (2012). Vegetated mixing layer around a patch of submerged plants: Part II turbulence statistics and structures. Water Resources Research, 48(12), W12506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolov, A., Sukhodolova, T., & Krick, J. (2017). Effects of vegetation on turbulent flow structure in groyne fields. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 55(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2016.1211183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolova, T. (2008). Studien zur turbulenten Strömung in Flussabschnitten mit Vegetation – Auswirkungen auf Transport- und Mischungsprozesse [Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt Universität Berlin]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18452/15843
   Google Scholar
• Sukhodolova, T. (2017). A semi-empirical model of the aquatic plants seasonal dynamics and its application for management of perennial macrophytes. Aquatic Botany, 143, 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolova, T., & Sukhodolov, A. (2012). Vegetated mixing layer around a patch of submerged plants: Part I Theory and field experiments. Water Resources Research, 48(10), W10533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettori, D., & Nikora, V. (2018). Flow-seaweed interactions: a laboratory study using blade models. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 18(3), 611–636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-017-9556-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettori, D., & Nikora, V. (2020). Hydrodynamic performance of vegetation surrogates in hydraulic studies: a comparative analysis of seaweed blades and their physical models. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 58(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1562999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettori, D., & Rice, S. P. (2020). Implications of environmental conditions for health status and biomechanics of freshwater macrophytes in hydraulic laboratories. Journal of Ecohydraulics, 5(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2019.1669496
   Google Scholar
• Warfe, D. M., & Barmuta, L. A. (2004). Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia, 141(1), 171–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1644-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlake, D. F. (1965). Some basic data for investigations of the productivity of aquatic macrophytes. In C. R. Goldman (Ed.), Primary productivity in aquatic environments. Mem. 1^st Ital. Idrobiol. 18 Suppl. University of California press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520318182-018
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2007). Flow resistance models for flexible submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydrology, 342(3-4), 213–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., & Horritt, M. S. (2002). Measuring the flow resistance of submerged grass. Hydrological Processes, 16(13), 2589–2598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar