Solitude at Grand Canyon: an application of expectancy theory

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictions of specific behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1): 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6): 359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. J., & Ross, D. M. (1982). Using desired recreation experiences to predict setting preferences. In Forest and River Recreation: Research Update (Miscellaneous Report No. 18). University of Minnesota Agricultural Experimental Station, 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: the total design method. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L. (1976). Toward a better understanding of the social benefits of outdoor recreation participation. In Proceedings of the Southern States Recreation Research Applications Workshop (Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-9). USDA Forest Service, 163–189.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L. (1977). Item Pool for scales designed to quantify the Psychological outcomes desired and expected from recreational participation. Unpublished manuscript. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, USDA Forest Service Recreation Project, Ft. Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, B. L., and Brown, P. J. (1975). A social-psychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning. In Assessing Demand for Outdoor Recreation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 62–88.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, G. E., Allen, D. J. & Manfredo, M. J. (1979). Some dispersed recreation experiences and the resource settings in which they occur. In Assessing Amenity Resource Values (Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-68). USDA Forest Service, 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W. E., & Brown, G. F. (1984). Functions of privacy in wilderness environments. Leisure Sciences, 6(2): 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, R. C., Peterson, G. L., & Leatherberry, E. C. (1983). Motives of recreational river floating: relative consistency across settings. Leisure Sciences. 5(3): 231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Knopp, T., Ballman, G. & Merriam, L. C. (1979). Toward a more direct measure of river user preferences. Journal of Leisure Research. 11(4): 317–326.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. (1973). Motivations in Work Organizations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. C. (1980). Use Patterns and Visitor Characteristics, Attitudes, and Preferences in Nine Wilderness and Other Roadless Areas. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-253.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J. (1979). Wilderness Experience Opportunities and Management Preferences for Three Wyoming Wilderness Areas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L., & Brown, P. J. (1983). A test of the concepts inherent in experience based setting management for outdoor recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research. 15(3): 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (1986). Studies in Outdoor Recreation. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (1985). Diversity in democracy: expanding the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum. Leisure Sciences. 7(4): 376–398.
   Google Scholar
• Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H. Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. L. (1974). Evaluating the quality of the wilderness environment: congruence between perception and aspiration. Environment and Behavior. 6(2): 169–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, D. R., Hendee, J. C., & Clark, R. N. (1973). Hunting Satisfaction: game, guns, or nature. In Human Dimensions in Wildlife Programs. Washington, D. C.: The Wildlife Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyer, R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1978). The influence of expectations on crowding perceptions and social-psychological carrying capacities. Leisure Sciences, 1 (4): 373–394.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. H. (1973). Visitor Perception of Wilderness Recreation Carrying Capacity. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-142.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. H. (1980). A Comparison of Carrying Capacity Perceptions Among Visitors to Two Wildernesses. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-242.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, A. H., Stewart, W. P., Manning, R. E., & Carpenter, E. H. (1986). A Sociological Study of Backcountry Users at Grand Canyon National Park (Tech. Rep. No. 17). USDI National Park Service, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, J. D., Dawson, M. S., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1982). Park Managers predictions of the motivations of visitors to two national park areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Witter, D. J., Haverland, P. S., Belusz, L. C., & Hicks, C. E. (1982). Missouri trout park anglers: their motives and opinions of management. In Forest and River Recreation: Research Update (Miscellaneous Report No. 18). University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wurman, R. S., Levy, A., & Katz, J. (1972). The Nature of Recreation: a handbook in honor of Frederick Law Olmsted, using examples from his work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar