Response Rates and Mail Recreation Survey Results: How Much Is Enough?

References

• Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, R. H. (1984). Gatekeepers of methodology: A reply to Brown. Leisure Sciences, 6, 513–518.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, R. H., Dottavio, F. D., & Mengak, K. K. (1987). Research note—engagement as a criterion for defining homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveys. Leisure Sciences, 9, 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, R. H., & Iliff, T. J. (1983). Nonrespondents in homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveys. Leisure Sciences, 5, 257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., Dawson, C. P., Hustin, D. L., & Decker, D. J. (1981). Comments on the importance of late respondent and nonrespondent data from mail surveys. Journal of Leisure Research, 13, 76–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. N. (1984). Alternative strategies for studying recreationists. In G. E. Machlis & D. R. Field (Eds.). On interpretation (pp. 23–41). Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. E. (1982). On generalizing about the need for follow-up efforts in mail recreation surveys. Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 263–265.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Goudy, W. J. (1976). Face-to-face interviews and mailed questionnaires: The net difference in response rate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 234–252.
   Google Scholar
• Goyder, J. (1985). Nonresponse effects on relationships between variables. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 360–369.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A qualitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kviz, F. J. (1977). Toward a standard definition of response rate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 265–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. C., & Oltman, J. L. (1971). Survey sampling wilderness visitors. Journal of Leisure Research, 3, 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlis, G. E., & Dolsen, D. E. (1988). Visitors at Yellowstone National Park (Rep. No. 15). Moscow: University of Idaho, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Visitors Services Project.
   Google Scholar
• Machlis, G. E., & Dolsen, D. E. (1989a). The 1988 National Park Service Visitor Services Project Mail Surveys: An Evaluation. Moscow: University of Idaho, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Visitor Services Project.
   Google Scholar
• Machlis, G. E., & Dolsen, D. E. (1989b). Visitors at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (Rep. No. 17). Moscow: University of Idaho, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Visitor Services Project.
   Google Scholar
• Machlis, G. E. & Dolsen, D. E. (1989c). Visitors at Denali National Park and Preserve (Rep. No. 18). Moscow: University of Idaho, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Visitor Services Project.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (1985). Studies in outdoor recreation. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, T. (1981). Outdoor recreation planning, perspectives, and research. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of the Interior. (1984). 1982–1983 nationwide recreation survey. Washington, DC: National Park Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, J. D., Hawk, E. G., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Buhyoff, G.J. (1980). Mailed questionnaire surveys and the reluctant respondent: An empirical examination of differences between early and late respondents. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar