Evaluating Recreation Trip Attributes and Travel Time Via Conjoint Analysis

References

• Addelman, S. (1962). Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics, 4(1), 21–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, W. A. (1977). Pollack and Wachter on the household production function approach. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1073–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, R. C., Heberlein, T. A. & Kealy, M.J. (1983). Contingent valuation of environment assets: Comparison with a simulated market. Natural Resources Journal, 23, 619–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E. & McConnell, K. E. (1981). Theory and estimation of the household production function for wildlife recreation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 8, 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E., Strand, I. E. & Hanemann, W. M. (1987). Time and the recreational demand model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2), 293–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, K. J., & Bishop, R. C. (1988). Welfare measurements using contingent valuation: A comparison of techniques. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretton-Clark, Inc. (1987). Conjoint Designer, Version 2 (software). New York: Bretton-Clark, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (1988). Valuing Oregon salmon by using a multimarket, hedonic travel cost method. Chapter 7 in Hueth, D., Strong, E. J. & Fight, R. J. (eds.) Sport Fishing: A Comparison of Three Indirect Methods for Estimating Benefits. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-RP-395. Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Mendelsohn, R. (1984). The hedonic travel cost method. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Cesario, F. J. (1976). Value of time in recreation benefit studies. Land Economics, 52, 32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fieller, E. C. (1932). The distribution of the index in a normal bivariate population. Biometrika, 24, 428–440.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. M. (1979). The benefits of environmental improvement: Theory and practice. Resources for the Future. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. M.. (1991). Factorial survey methods and willingness to pay for housing characteristics: A comment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20(1), 92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. E. (1974). On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. E., Carroll, J. D. & Goldberg, S. M. (1981). A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45, 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gum, R. L. & Martin, W. E. (1975). Problems and solutions in estimating the demand for and value of rural outdoor recreation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(4), 558–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammack, J. & Brown, M. G. (1974). Waterfowl and wetlands: Toward bioeconomic analysis. Resources for the Future. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3), 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E., Jr. (1980). The LOGIST procedure. SUGI Manual. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lansing, J. B. & Morgan, J. N. (1971). Economic survey methods. Survey Research Center. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, J. (1988). Toward the economic valuation of hunting and public wildlife management. AES Bulletin 473. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Madansky, A. (1980). On conjoint analysis and quantal choice models. Journal of Business, 53(3.2), s37–s44.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, K. E. (1979). Values of marine recreational fishing: Measurement and import of measurement. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 22–925.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, K. E. & Strand, I. (1981). Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: An application to sportfishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 153–156.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, R. A. & Wachter, M. L. (1975). The relevance of the household production function and its implications for the allocation of time. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 255–277.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, R. A. & Wachter, M. L.. (1977). Reply: Pollack and Wachter on the household production approach. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1083–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. D., Stevens, T. H. & Allen, P. G. (1981). Measurement of recreation benefits for urban-oriented camping. Research Bulletin 667. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. G., Sanders, L. D. & McKean, J. R. (1990). The consumptive value of travel time on recreation trips, journal of Travel Research, 29, 17–24.
   Google Scholar