Influence of the Onsite Experience on Recreation Experience Preference Judgments

References

• Allen, L., & Donnelly, M. (1985). An analysis of the social unit of participation and the perceived psychological outcomes associated with most enjoyable recreation activities. Leisure Sciences, 7(4), 421–441.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, V. (1964). Uncertainty of outcome and post-decision dissonance reduction. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance (pp. 34–45). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 11–34. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. J., & Haas, G. E. (1980). Wilderness recreation experiences: the Rawah case. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(3), 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, R. (1980). Motivations for leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Croyle, R. & Cooper, J. (1983). Dissonance arousal: Physiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 782–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P. (1979). Measurement and meaning of recreation satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 11(4), 483–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, B. (1977). Item pool for scales designed to quantify the psychological outcomes desired and expected from recreational participation. Unpublished manuscript, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service Recreation Project, Ft. Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R., Zanna, M. & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(5), 464–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1976). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson and Company.
   Google Scholar
• French, J., Rodgers, W. & Cobb, J. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. In G. Coelho, D. Hamburg and J. Adams (Eds.), Coping and Adaptation, 316–333. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J., & Doering, M. (1979). Sex role orientation and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 11(2), 102–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iso-Ahola, S. & Allen, J. (1982). The dynamics of leisure motivation: The effects of outcome on leisure needs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53(2), 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (1980). Outdoor recreation participation: A comparative analysis. Leisure Sciences, 3(2), 129–154.
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, R. C., Peterson, G. L. & Leatherberry, E. C. (1983). Motives of recreational river floating: Relative consistency across settings. Leisure Sciences, 5(3), 231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. (1961). Adjustment and Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Little, B. (1987). Personality and the environment. In D. Stokols and I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1, 205–244. New York: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. (1967). Relationship of success and expectation to affect on goal-seeking tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(2), 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. (1984). The comparability of onsite and offsite measures of recreation needs. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(3), 245–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L. & Brown, P.J. (1983). A test of concepts inherent in experience based setting management for outdoor recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(3), 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (1985). Studies in Outdoor Recreation. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G., & Lime, D. (1973). Two sources of bias in the measurement of human response to the wilderness environment. Journal of Leisure Research, 5(2), 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion, Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. H., Waldman, D. W., & Driver, B. L. (1982). Construct validity of instruments measuring recreationists' preferences. Leisure Sciences, 5(2), 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyer, R., & Lime, D. W. (1984). A novice isn't necessarily a novice—the influence of experience use history on subjective perceptions of recreation participation. Leisure Sciences, 6(2), 131–149.
   Google Scholar
• Virden, R. J. and Knopf, R. C. (1989). Activities, experiences, and environmental settings: A case study of Recreation Opportunity Spectrum relationships. Leisure Sciences, 11(3), 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, J., Dawson, M. & Roggenbuck, J. (1982). Park managers predictions of the motivations of visitors to two national park areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Ellis, G., Nickerson, N. & Shafer, C. (1988). Contributions of time, format, and subject to variation in recreation experience preference measurement. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(1), 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., Schreyer, R. & Knopf, R. C. (1990). The effect of the experience use history on the multidimensional structure of motivations to participate in leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), 36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, M. S. and McEwen, D. (1989). Test for campers' experience preference differences among three ROS setting classes. Leisure Sciences, 11(3), 177–185.
   Google Scholar
• Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 703–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. (1976). Dissonance and the attribution process. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. Kidd (Eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research, 1, 199–217. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar