69
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Appropriate Fees for Wilderness Day Use: Pricing Decisions for Recreation on Public Land

&
Pages 269-280 | Published online: 13 Dec 2017

References

  • Ajzen, I., Rosenthal, L. H., & Brown, T. C. (1996). Judged fairness and contingent valuation: Effects of equity on absolute and relative willingness to pay. (Final Report CA 28-C3-753). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
  • Baldares C. M. J., & Laarman, J. G. (1991). User fees at protected areas in Costa Rica. In Proceedings, Valuing Environmental Benefits in Developing Economies. Special Report 29. Michigan Sate University, Agriculture Experiment Station, East Lansing.
  • Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (December), 926–930.
  • Chase, L. C., Lee, D. R., Schulze, W. D., and Anderson, D. J. (1998). Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of national park access in Costa Rica. Land Economics, 74(4), 466–482.
  • Cole, D. N., Watson, A. E., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1995). Trends in wilderness visitors and visits: Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Shining Rock, and Desolation Wilderness. Research Paper INT-RP-483. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
  • Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (August), 332–341.
  • Lucas, R. C. (1980). Use patterns and visitor characteristics, attitudes and preferences in nine wilderness and other roadless areas. Research Paper INT-253. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
  • McCarville, R. E., Reiling, S. D., & White, C. M. (1996). The role of fairness in users' assessments of first-time fees for a public recreation service. Leisure Sciences, 18, 61–76.
  • McCollum, D. W., Haefele, R. S., & Rosenberger, R. S. (1999). A survey of 1997 Colorado anglers and their willingness to pay increased license fees. Project Report No. 39. Colorado Division of Wildlife. Colorado State University, Fort Collins and USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
  • Mitchell, R. C., & Carson R. T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
  • More, T. A. (In Press). A functionalist approach to user fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 3rd Quarter, 1999.
  • Richer, J. R. (1998). Setting new fees for recreation: Daily and annual pricing options in the Southern California national forests. Presented at the 7th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Columbia, MO, May 28, 1998.
  • Richer, J. R. (1995). Willingness to pay for desert protection. Contemporary Economic Policy, XIII (October), 93–104.
  • Rosenthal, D. H., Loomis J. B., & Peterson, G. L. (1984). Pricing for efficiency and revenue in public recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(3), 195–208.
  • Stankey, G. H. (1980). A comparison of carrying capacity perceptions among visitors to two wildernesses. Research Paper INT-242. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
  • Stapel, J. (1972). “Fair” or “psychological” pricing? Journal of Marketing Research, 9(February), 109–110.
  • Watson, A. E. (1993). Characteristics of visitors without permits compared to those with permits at the Desolation Wilderness, California. Research Note INT-414. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
  • Watson, A. E., Cole, D. N., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1995). Trends in wilderness recreation use characteristics. In Thompson, J. L., Lime, D. W., Gartner, B., Sames, W. M., compilers. Proceedings of the 4th International Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Trends Symposium and the 1995 National Recreation Resources Planning Conference, St. Paul, MN.
  • Watson, A. E., & Cronn, R. (1994). How previous experience relates to visitors' perceptions of wilderness conditions. Backcountry. Recreation Management: Trends, 31(3), 43–46.
  • Watson, A. E., Puttkammer A., Christensen, N. A., Parsons, D. J., Williams, D. R., Vogt, C., Richer, J. R., & Trainor S. F. (1998). Providing science input to management issues: Defining and answering researchable questions—a case study of the Desolation Wilderness fee pilot program. Presented at the 7th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Columbia, MO.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.