Would You Displace? It Depends! A Multivariate Visual Approach to Intended Displacement from an Urban Forest Trail

References

• Addelman, S. (1962). Symmetrical and asymmetrical fractional factorial design plans. Technometrics, 4(1), 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andereck, K. L., & Becker, R. H. (1993). Perceptions of carry-over crowding in recreation environments. Leisure Sciences, 15, 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnberger, A. (2003). Modellierung sozialer Tragfähigkeitsgrenzen von Erholungsgebieten. Dargestellt am Erholungsgebiet Wienerberg [Modeling social carrying capacities of recreation areas—The recreation area Wienerberg]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Arnberger, A., & Brandenburg, C. (2002). Visitor structure of a heavily used conservation area: The Danube Floodplains National Park, Lower Austria. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg & A. Muhar (Eds.), Monitoring and Management of Visitor Rows in Recreational and Protected Areas (pp. 7–13). Vienna: Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Management.
   Google Scholar
• Arnberger, A., & Haider, W. (2005). Social effects on crowding preferences of urban forest visitors. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 3(3-4), 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Learner, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58(10), 4602–4614.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, A., & Paulus, P. B. (1991). Crowding. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 533–570). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application in travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., & Hörnsten, L. (2001). Perceived crowding, visitor satisfaction and trail design in Fulufjäll National Park Sweden. Report. Östersund, Sweden: European Tourism Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W. H. (1998). LIMDEP, Version 7.0—User's manual revised edition. New York: Econometric Software.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, W. (2002). Stated preference and choice models—A versatile alternative to traditional recreation research. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg & A. Muhar (Eds.), Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas (pp. 115–121). Vienna: Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Management.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, W., & Ewing, G. O. (1990). A model of tourist choices of hypothetical Caribbean destinations. Leisure Sciences, 12, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Shelby, B. (2000). Temporal and spatial displacement: Evidence from a high-use reservoir and alternate sites. Journal of Leisure Research 32, 435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L., Haider, W., & Bottan, B. (2005). Accounting for varying setting preferences among moose hunters. Leisure Sciences, 27, 297–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. K., & Dawson, C. (2001). Coping, crowding and satisfaction: A study of Adirondack Wilderness Hikers. Proceedings of the 2001 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, General Technical Report NE-289, USDA Forest Service, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Humanscape: Environments for People. Michigan: Ulrich's Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kuentzel, W. F., & Heberlein, T. (1992). Cognitive and behavioral adaptations to perceived crowding: A panel study of coping and displacement. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 377–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laven, D., Manning, R. E., & Krymkowski, D. H. (2005). The relationship between visitor-based standards of quality and existing conditions in parks and outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 27, 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S. R., & Manning, R. E. (2002). Tradeoffs among social, resource, and management attributes of the Denali Wilderness experience: A contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods—Analysis and application. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luymes, D. T., & Tamminga, K. (1995). Integrating public safety and use into planning urban greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 391–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E. (2001). Carrying capacity as ‘informed judgment’: The values of science and the science of values. In W. A. Wayne & D. N. Cole (Eds.), Visitor Use Density and Wilderness Experience (pp. 21–28). Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E., Lime, D. W., Freimund, W. A., & Pitt, D. G. (1996). Crowding norms at front-country sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences, 18, 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E., & Valliere, W. A. (2001). Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. Journal of Leisure Research 33, 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. E., Valliere W. A., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (1999). Crowding norms: Alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences, 21, 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities. Science, 167, 1461–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Orland, B., Daniel, T. C., & Haider, W. (1995). Calibrated images: Landscape visualizations to meet rigorous experimental design specifications. In M. J. Power, M. Strome, & T. C. Daniel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Geographic Information Seminar and the Resource Technology ′94 Symposium (pp. 919–926). Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. A., & Regula, J. A. (1994). Recreational displacement and overall satisfaction: A study of Central Iowa's licensed boaters. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 174–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggenbuck, J. W., Williams, D. R., & Watson, A. E. (1993). Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management, 17, 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreyer, R., & Knopf, R. C. (1984). The dynamics of change in outdoor recreation environments—Some equity issues. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., Bregenzer, N. S., & Johnson, R. (1988). Displacement and product shift: Empirical evidence from Oregon Rivers. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 274–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G. H. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity. Research Paper INT-142. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, W., Larkin, K., Orland, B., & Anderson, D. (2003). Boater preferences for beach characteristics downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E. (1978). Crowding as a sequential process: Review of research on the effects of population density on humans. In A. Baum & Y. M. Epstein (Eds.), Human response to crowding (pp. 31–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar