A comparison of data collection methods: Mail versus online surveys

References

• Babbie, E. R. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Hayek, J. C., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M., & Ouimet, J. A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, N. A., Brown, T. L., & Decker, D. J. (2003). Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society and Natural Resources, 16(6), 541–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. D., Wolfe, E. W., Huang, X. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/Web. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P., Traugott, M. W., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2006). Web-based questionnaires and the mode effect—An evaluation based on completion rates and data contents of near-identical questionnaires delivered in different modes. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2009). Item non-response rates: A comparison of online and paper questionnaires. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 281–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, J. P., & MacLachlan, D. L. (1996). Fax surveys: Return patterns and comparison with mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 33(1), 108–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. The total design method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In U. D. Reips & M. Bosniak (Eds.), Dimensions of internet science (pp. 159–178). Lebgerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Reips, U.-D., & Matzat, U. (2010). Advice in surveying the general public over the internet. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, M. D., & Nobile, J. L. (2010). The fallacy of online surveys: No data are better than bad data. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal, 15(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Etter, R. (2002). Do response rates and responses differ between mail and internet answers in a mixed mode survey? (Working paper No. 68). Zurich, Switzerland: Swill Institute for Business Cycle Research, Swill Federal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 15(2), 195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, C. M., & Bowden, M. (2009). Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 284–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, R. D., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347–367.
   Google Scholar
• Gigliotti, L. M. (2011). Comparison of an Internet versus mail survey: A case study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal, 16(1), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlaw, C., & Brown-Welty, S. (2009). A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Evaluation Review, 33(5), 464–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. H., Fischer, D. P., & Morgan, M. T. (2001, May). Testing an Internet response option for the American community survey. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Griffis, S. E., Goldsby, T. J., & Cooper, M. (2003). Web-based and mail surveys: A comparison of response, data, and cost. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 237–258.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, M. K. (2005). Effects of survey mode, gender, and perceived sensitivity on the quality of data regarding sensitive health behaviors. Bloomington: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar, T. (2008). Perceived survey quality and respondent participation. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 17(6), 1203–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar, T., & Kolar, I. (2008). What respondents really expect from researchers. Evaluation Review, 32(4), 363–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser, V. M., Yang, D., & Newton, L. (2011). Assessing hunters' opinions based on a mail and a mixed-mode survey. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16(3), 164.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, I., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2009). Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfreda, K. L., Berzelak, J., Vehovar, V., Bosnjak, M., & Haas, I. (2008). A meta-analysis of response rates in web surveys compared to other survey modes. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, M., & Dillman, D. (2011). Improving response to web and mixed-mode surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 249–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. B. (2009). Choosing between internet and mail survey modes for choice experiment surveys considering non-market goods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(4), 591–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penkala, J. M. (2004). Internet vs. access point intercept survey to obtain stakeholder information. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9(1), 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2007). Mixed-mode contacts in web surveys - Paper is not necessarily better. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(4), 635–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reja, U., Manfreda, K. L., Hlebec, V., & Vehovar, V. (2003). Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. Metodoloski Zvezki, 19, 159–177.
   Google Scholar
• Sala, E., & Lynn, P. (2009). The potential of a multi-mode data collection design to reduce non response bias. The case of a survey of employers. Quality & Quantity, 43(1), 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1998). Development of standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(3), 378–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 29(2), 274–279.
   Google Scholar
• Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D. Jr., & Elliott, M. N. (2002). Conducting research surveys via e-mail and the web. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, N. R., Miller, H. M., & Dietsch, A. M. (2011). Appropriate uses and considerations for online surveying in human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16(3), 154–163.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, D. M., & Bradshaw, C. C. (2002). A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(2), 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. (2006). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2), JCMC621. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
   Google Scholar
• Shih, T. H., & Fan, X. T. (2008). Comparing response rates from Web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20(3), 249–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, E., Johnson, T. P., & Rao, K. (2012). Survey mode effects on data quality: Comparison of web and mail modes in a U.S. national panel survey. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 212–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smee, A., & Brennan, M. (2000, November–December). Electronic surveys: A comparison of e-mail, web and mail. Paper presented at the ANZMAC 2000 Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L., & O’Neill, A. (2010). Using the internet to survey small towns and communities: Limitations and possibilities in the early 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1423–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, J. M. (1998). An empirical assessment of data collection using the internet. Personnel Psychology, 51(3), 709–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 775–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, A. C. B. (1998). Comparing the response rate, response speed end response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: e-mail vs. mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40(4), 1–361.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, D., Kim, H., & Matier, M. (2000, May). To mail or to web: comparisons of survey response rates and respondent characteristics. Paper presented at the 186 Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: application in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., & Manfreda, K. L. (2010). Mobile phones in an environment of competing survey modes: Applying metric for evaluation of costs and errors. Social Science Computer Review, 28(3), 303–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, R., & Wallace, J. (1998). Cyber research: The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10(3), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Weigold, A., Weigold, I. K., & Russell, E. J. (2013). Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods. Psychological Methods, 18(1), 53–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, J. C., Amoroso, L. M., & Howard, P. E. N. (2000). Research methodology - Method and representation in Internet-based survey tools - Mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey2000. Social Science Computer Review, 18(2), 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetter, G., & Capaccioli, K. (2010). Differences in responses to Web and paper surveys among school professionals. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar