Programming parks. How do organized events and activities affect the inclusivity of urban green spaces?

References

• Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, A., Crawford, A., Booth, N., & Churchill, D. (2019). Everyday encounters with difference in urban parks: Forging ‘openness to otherness’ in segmenting cities. International Journal of Law in Context, 15(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M. L. (2019). Super-diversity, austerity, and the production of precarity: Latin Americans in London. Critical Social Policy, 39(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318790744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citroni, S., & Karrholm, M. (2019). Neighbourhood events and the visibilization of everyday life: The cases of Turro (Milan) and Norra Fäladen (Lund). European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417719489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2018, September 1). The UK’s parks are precious: They need protection from organised fun. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/01/uk-parks-protection-organised-fun-councils-peace
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, J. (2009). Thinking spatially: Towards an everyday understanding of inter-ethnic relations. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360902853288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014). Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, K., & Stevens, Q. (Eds.). (2007). Tying down loose space. In Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life (pp. 1–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. (2015). Animating public space. In S. Gammon & S. Elkington (Eds.), Landscapes of leisure (pp. 96–109). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. (2020). Bringing public spaces to life: The animation of public space. In V. Mehta & D. Palazzo (Eds.), Companion to public space (pp. 414–425). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gobster, P. (2002). Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400252900121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. (2010). Art spaces, public space, and the link to community development. Community Development Journal, 45(4), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsp018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Shelby, B. (2000). Temporal and spatial displacement: Evidence from a high-use reservoir and alternate sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haringey (2020). Finsbury Park: Park management plan. London Borough of Haringey.
   Google Scholar
• Hebbert, M. (2008). Re-enclosure of the urban picturesque: Green-space transformations in postmodern urbanism. Town Planning Review, 79(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.79.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, F.-A., & Lim, T. (2021). Examining privilege and power in US urban parks and open space during the double crises of antiblack racism and COVID-19. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 3(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamvasinou, K. (2006). Vague parks: The politics of late twentieth-century urban landscapes. Architectural Research Quarterly, 10(3–4), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135506000364
   Google Scholar
• Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Mukhija, V. (2019). Promoting justice for underserved groups in Periurban parks: The potential of state-community partnerships. Leisure Studies, 38(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2018.1544656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. G. (2013). Public space and diversity: Distributive, procedural and interactional justice for parks. In G. Young & D. Stevenson (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to planning and culture (pp. 295–310). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, D. (2010). Revisiting the end of public space: Assembling the public in an urban park. City & Community, 9(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01321.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayor of London (2018). Inclusive London. The Mayor’s equality, diversity and inclusion strategy. GLA.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2017). People’s Park again: On the end and ends of public space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15611557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modan, G. (2008). Mango fufu kimchi yucca: The depoliticization of “diversity in Washington, DC discourse”. City & Society, 20(2), 188–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2008.00017.x
   Google Scholar
• Moshakis, A. (2022, January 16). Noises off. The battle to save our quiet places. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jan/16/noises-off-the-battle-to-save-our-quiet-places
   Google Scholar
• Neal, S., Bennett, K., Jones, H., Cochrane, A., & Mohan, G. (2015). Multiculture and public parks: Researching super‐diversity and attachment in public green space. Population, Space and Place, 21(5), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, H. (2020, May 15). My local park is a space where I can be alone – and feel part of the community. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2020/may/15/local-park-be-alone-and-feel-part-of-the-community
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. (2010). Being together in urban parks: Connecting public space, leisure, and diversity. Leisure Sciences, 32(5), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2010.510987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, S., Graefe, A., Benfield, J., Hickerson, B., Baker, B., Mullenbach, L., & Mowen, A. (2022). Exploring the conditions that promote intergroup contact at urban parks. Journal of Leisure Research, 53(3), 426–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2021.1910089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, S. L., Lee, K. J., Pitas, N. A., Graefe, A. R., & Mowen, A. J. (2020). Understanding access and use of municipal parks and recreation through an intersectionality perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1701965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, C. (2018). Open-ended: Public spaces as complex adaptive systems. In: C. Ivers (Ed.), Staging urban landscapes. The activation and curation of flexible public spaces (pp. 46–53). Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, G. (2015). Events in the network society: The role of pulsar and iterative events. Event Management, 19(4), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599515X14465748512849
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (2016, December 20). Income inequality mapped: London’s boroughs dominate in the league table of haves vs have-nots. Daily Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/20/income-inequality-mapped-londons-boroughs-dominate-league-table/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2021). Sustaining municipal parks in an era of neoliberal austerity: The contested commercialisation of Gunnersbury Park. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20951814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfield, K. (2018). Mapping multiplicity: Place, difference and conviviality in Finsbury Park, London [Doctoral dissertation]. Royal Holloway. https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/mapping-multiplicity-place-difference-and-conviviality-in-finsbury-park-london(331391b3-3438-463a-ab2c-ed776bea1f6c).html
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, J. (2015). Music/city: American festivals and placemaking in Austin, Nashville, and Newport. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E., Bausys, R., & Mazonaviciute, I. (2019). Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar