Global Network Inference from Ego Network Samples: Testing a Simulation Approach

REFERENCES

• Adams, J., Moody, J., & Morris, M. (2013). Sex, drugs, and race: How behaviors differentially contribute to the sexually transmitted infection risk network structure. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 322–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, S., Khandelwal, S., & Meyers, L. (2009). Exploring biological network structure with clustered random networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J. (2004). Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (2006). Robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28, 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980). Statistical methods in cancer research: Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. Lyon, France: IARC Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. R., Cagney, K. A., & Iveniuk, J. (2012). Neighborhood stressors and cardiovascular health: Crime and C-reactive protein in Dallas, USA. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1271–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6, 293–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 702–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheadle, J. E., & Schwadel, P. (2012). The ‘friendship dynamics of religion,’ or the ‘religious dynamics of friendship'? A social network analysis of adolescents who attend small schools. Social Science Research, 41, 1198–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, O. (1971). Statistical inference in graphs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stockholm University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, O. (1978). Sampling and estimation in large social networks. Social Networks, 1, 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 832–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. (2011). Comment: On respondent-driven sampling and snowball sampling. In Hard-to-reach populations and snowball sampling not in hard-to-reach populations. Sociological Methodology, 41, 347–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46, 103–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, R. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1143–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grannis, R. (2010). Six degrees of “who cares?” American Journal of Sociology, 115, 991–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M., Goodreau, S. M., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., & Morris, M. (2008). ergm: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. Journal of Statistical Software, 24 , nihpa54860.
   Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., & Gile, K. J. (2010). Modeling social networks from sampled data. Annals of the Applied Statistics, 4, 5–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., & Jones, J. H. (2004). Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation. Theoretical Population Biology, 65, 413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1976). Local structure in social networks. Sociological Methodology, 7, 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, J. H., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. (2010). Analysing exponential random graph (p-star) models with missing data using Bayesian data augmentation. Statistical Methodology, 7, 366–384.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, J. H., Robins, G. L., Wang, P., & Pattison, P. E. (2013). Bayesian analysis for partially observed network data, missing ties, attributes and actors. Social Networks, 35, 514–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28, 247–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (1999). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 770–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivitsky, P. N., Handcock, M. S., & Morris, M. (2011). Adjusting for network size and composition effects in exponential-family random graph models. Statistical Methodology, 8, 319–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, J.-S. (2008). Inferring adolescent social networks using partial ego-network substance use data. (Unpublished thesis). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Lizardo, O. (2006). How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review, 71, 778–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louch, H. (2000). Personal network integration: Transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks, 22, 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A. (2004). Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics?: Implications for name generator data. Social Networks, 26, 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A., & Hampton, K. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator. Field Methods, 19, 163–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M. (2009). A baseline dynamic model for ego networks. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0002764209331530
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merli, M. G., Moody, J., Smith, J., Li, J., Weir, S., & Chen, X. (2015). Challenges to recruiting population representative samples of female sex workers in China using respondent driven sampling. Social Science & Medicine, 125, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middendorf, M. E. Z., Wiggins, C. H., & Honig, B. H. (2005). Inferring, network mechanisms: The Drosophila melanogaster protein interaction, and network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 3192–3197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2001). Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 679–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Journal of Sociology, 69, 213–238.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 68,103–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Kurth, A. E., Hamilton, D. T., Moody, J., & Wakefield, S. (2009). Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: Linking science and public health practice. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1023–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., and Onnela, J.-P. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328, 876–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J., Strogatz, S. H., & Watts, D. J. (2001). Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Physical Review E, 64, 026118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., Snijders, T. A. B., & Wang, P. (2013). Conditional estimation of exponential random graph models from snowball sampling designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 284–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z. (2002). Race and social distance: Intermarriage with non-Latino whites. Race & Society, 5, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, G., Snijders, T., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P. (2007). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 192–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J. (2008). Racial, educational and religious endogamy in the United States: A comparative historical perspective. Social Forces, 87, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. R., Kornienko, O., & Fox, A. M. (2011). Misery does not love company: Network selection mechanisms and depression homophily. American Sociological Review, 76, 764–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwed, U., & Bearman, P. S. (2010). The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. American Sociological Review, 75, 817–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2012). Macrostructure from microstructure: Generating whole systems from ego networks. Sociological Methodology, 42, 155–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79, 432–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Moody, J. (2013). Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: Nodes missing at random. Social Networks, 35, 652–668.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36, 99–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soffer, S., & Vazquez, A. (2005). Network clustering coefficient without degree-correlation biases. Physical Review E, 71, 057101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. K., & Frank, O. (2000). Model-based estimation with link-tracing sampling designs. Survey Methodology, 26, 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, A. M., Entwisle, B., Faust, K., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2012). Social and spatial networks: Kinship distance and dwelling unit proximity in rural Thailand. Social Networks, 34, 112–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viger, F., Latapy, M., & Wang, L. (2005). Efficient and simple generation of random simple connected graphs with prescribed degree sequence computing and combinatorics. In L. Wang (Ed.), Lecture notes in computer science ( Vol. 3595, pp. 440–449). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika, 61, 401–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 5766–5771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, M., Colen, C., & Pescosolido, B. (2011). The sociology of suicide. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 505–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Kolaczyk, E. D., & pencer, B. D. (2014). Estimating network degree distributions under sampling: An inverse problem, with applications to monitoring social media networks. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4977
   Google Scholar