References
- Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Coleman, J. S. (1958). Relational analysis: The study of social organizations with survey methods. Human Organization, 17, 28–36. doi:10.17730/humo.17.4.q5604m676260q8n7
- Coleman, J. S. (1964). Introduction to mathematical sociology. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Fararo, T. J. (1981). Biased networks and social structure theorems. Social Networks, 3, 137–159. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(81)90012-5
- Fararo, T. J., & Sunshine, M. (1964). A study of a biased friendship net. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
- Goodman, L. A. 1978. Analyzing qualitative/categorical data: Log-linear models and latent structure analysis (J. Magidson, Ed.). Lanham, MD: Abt Associates.
- Goodman, L. A. (1984). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Huckfeldt, R. R. (1983). Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: Environmental constraints on friendship choice. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 651–669. doi:10.1086/227908
- Karpiński, Z., & Skvoretz, J. (2015). Repulsed by the ‘Other’: Integrating theory with method in the study of intergroup association. Sociological Theory, 33, 20–43. doi:10.1177/0735275115572687
- Marsden, P. V. (1981). Models and methods for characterizing the structural parameters of groups. Social Networks, 3, 1–27. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(81)90002-2
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- Skvoretz, J. (1991). Theoretical and methodological models of networks and relations. Social Networks, 13, 275–300. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(91)90009-I
- Skvoretz, J. (2013). Diversity, integration, and social ties: Attraction versus repulsion as drivers of intra- and intergroup relations. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 486–517. doi:10.1086/674050