3,621
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Explaining cooperation in the finitely repeated simultaneous and sequential prisoner’s dilemma game under incomplete and complete information

&
Pages 1-25 | Received 22 Mar 2016, Accepted 16 Aug 2016, Published online: 22 Sep 2016

References

  • Aksoy, O., & Weesie, J. (2013). Social motives and expectations in one-shot asymmetric prisoner’s dilemmas. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 37, 24–58. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2011.556764
  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 103, 464–477. doi:10.2307/2234133
  • Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. H. (1993). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma: Experimental evidence. The Economic Journal, 103, 570–585. doi:10.2307/2234532
  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic.
  • Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bichierri, C. (2006). The grammar of society. The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bolle, F., & Ockenfels, P. (1990). Prisoner’s dilemma as a game with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11, 69–84. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(90)90047-D
  • Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166–193. doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166
  • Bouma, J., Bulte, E., & Van Soest, D. (2008). Trust and cooperation: Social capital and community resource management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56, 155–166. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.03.004
  • Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Dawes, R. M. (2002). Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 168–206. doi:10.1086/344546
  • Clark, K., & Sefton, M. (2001). The sequential prisoner’s dilemma: Evidence on reciprocation. The Economic Journal, 111, 51–68. doi:10.1111/ecoj.2001.111.issue-468
  • Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. W. (1996). Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior, 12, 187–218. doi:10.1006/game.1996.0013
  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
  • Dawes, R. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 187–197. doi:10.1257/jep.2.3.187
  • Diekmann, A., Jann, B., Przepiorka, W., & Wehrli, S. (2014). Reputation formation and the evolution of cooperation in anonymous online markets. American Sociological Review, 79, 65–85. doi:10.1177/0003122413512316
  • Dijkstra, J. (2012). Explaining contributions to public goods: Formalizing the social exchange heuristic. Rationality and Society, 24, 324–342. doi:10.1177/1043463111434702
  • Dijkstra, J. (2013). Put your money where your mouth is: Reciprocity, social preferences, trust, and contributions to public goods. Rationality and Society, 25, 290–334. doi:10.1177/1043463113492305
  • Dijkstra, J., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2013). Network public goods with asymmetric information about cooperation preferences and network degree. Social Networks, 35, 573–582. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.005
  • Dufwenberg, M., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47, 268–298. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003
  • Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54, 293–315. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140. doi:10.1038/415137a
  • Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 43–64. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131812
  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868. doi:10.1162/003355399556151
  • Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory, 53, 236–260. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(91)90155-W
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. D. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hardin, G. J. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
  • Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11, 27–46. doi:10.1177/104346399011001002
  • Kiyonari, T., Tanida, S., & Yamagishi, T. (2000). Social exchange and reciprocity: Confusion or a heuristic? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 411–427. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00055-6
  • Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183
  • Kreps, D., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 245–252. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1
  • Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Pubilc goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel, & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Levine, D. K. (1998). Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1, 593–622. doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023
  • Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of melanesian New Guinea. London, UK: G. Routledge & Sons.
  • Mauss, M. (1923–1924). Essai sur le Don: Forme et Raison de l’Échange dans les Sociétés Primitives. In L’Année Sociologique, seconde série. Paris, France.
  • Nax, H. H., Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A. (2015). Interactive preferences. Economics Letters, 135, 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.08.008
  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Opp, K. D., Voss, P., & Gern, C. (1995). Origins of a spontaneous revolution: East Germany, 1989. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Originally published as Die volkseigene Revolution. Stuthtgart: Klett-Cotta, 1993.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Palfrey, T. R., & Prisbrey, J. E. (1997). Anomalous behavior in public goods experiments: How much and why? The American Economic Review, 87, 829–846.
  • Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302.
  • Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35, 395–405. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00755-9
  • Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58–92. doi:10.1177/1043463195007001004
  • Simpson, B. (2004). Social values, subjective transformations, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 385–395. doi:10.1177/019027250406700404
  • Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Tutic, A., & Liebe, U. (2009). A theory of status-mediated inequity aversion. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 33, 157–195. doi:10.1080/00222500902799601
  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Watts, D. J. (2014). Common sense and sociological explanations. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 313–351. doi:10.1086/678271
  • Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23–43. doi:10.1177/000312240907400102
  • Yamagishi, T., Terai, S., Kiyonari, T., Mifune, N., & Kanazawa, S. (2007). The social exchange heuristic: Managing errors in social exchange. Rationality and Society, 19, 259–291. doi:10.1177/1043463107080449