Dynamics of knowledge-intensive production: An agency-structure framework

References

• Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects. Information & Management, 44(7), 646–656. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (2003). The meanings of social life: A cultural sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amrit, C., & Van Hillegersberg, J. (2008). Detecting coordination problems in collaborative software development environments. Information Systems Management, 25(1), 57–70. doi:10.1080/10580530701777156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. N., & Morley, T. D. (1985). Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of a graph. Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 18(2), 141–145. doi:10.1080/03081088508817681
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 455–483. doi:10.2307/589357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., & Vespignani, A. (2008). Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2017). Pajek — Program for large network analysis. Retrieved January 2, 2014 from http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 229–251. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., Bordia, P., & Duck, J. (2003). Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: Toward a new understanding of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 106–117. doi:10.2307/30040680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, (Supplement): S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847. doi:10.2307/256391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlauf, S. N. (2001). A framework for the study of individual behavior and social interactions. Sociological Methodology, 31(1), 47–87. doi:10.1111/some.2001.31.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibrium: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Shopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454. doi:10.1086/230450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J. D., & Moitra, D. (2001). Global software development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 16–20. doi:10.1109/52.914732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M., Seidel-Morgenstern, A., & Kremling, A. (2006). Exploiting the bootstrap method for quantifying parameter confidence intervals in dynamical systems. Metabolic Engineering, 8(5), 447–455. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2006.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (1999). Effects of leadership style and followers’ cultural orientation on performance in group and individual task conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 208–218. doi:10.2307/257093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 307–332. doi:10.1177/1046496404264941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 37–48. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., & Streeter, L. (1996). Coordination in software development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69–81. doi:10.1145/203330.203345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.-S., & Zhang, X.-D. (1998). On the Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 285(1–3), 305–307. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(98)10149-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103–127. doi:10.2307/3088904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256. doi:10.1137/S003614450342480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Chung, M., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875. doi:10.2307/20159627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfati-Saber, R. (2006). Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: Algorithms and theory. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 51(3), 401–420. doi:10.1109/TAC.2005.864190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., & Willcocks, L. (2008). Missing links: Building critical social ties for global collaborative teamwork. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 76–81. doi:10.1145/1330311
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1970). On building social system theory: A personal history. Daedalus, 99(4), 826–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. I. (1997). In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 18(1), 21–42. doi:10.1177/017084069701800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–325. doi:10.2307/3069458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504. doi:10.1086/432782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2), 109–125. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.2.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use: A structurational analysis. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 359–380. doi:10.2307/4132313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (1999). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 493–527. doi:10.1086/210318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393, 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, R. W. (1980). Management of large software development efforts. MIS Quarterly, 4(2), 45–55. doi:10.2307/249336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar