The cultural Red King effect

References

• Axtell, R., Epstein, J. M., & Young, P. H. (2000). The emergence of classes in a multi-agent bargaining model. Social Dynamics, 2001, 191–211.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (1995). Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. The American Economic Review, 85(3), 304–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, C. T., & Lachmann, M. (2003). The Red King effect: When the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(2), 593–598. doi:10.1073/pnas.0134966100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination, IUI Working Paper No. 407, National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Björnerstedt, J., & Weibull, J. W. (1994). Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84–103. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. P. (2017). Minority disadvantage in population games. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. P., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Power, bargaining, and collaboration. In T. Boyer, C. Mayo-Wilson, & M. Weisberg (Eds.), Scientific collaboration and collective knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. (1871). Through the looking glass: And what Alice found there. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eswaran, M. (2014). Why gender matters in economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, E. (2014). Communication networks in markets. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Li, Y.-T., & Wang, R.-W. (2015). The shift between the Red Queen and the Red King effects in mutualisms. Scientific Reports, 5, 8237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhale, C. S., & Traulsen, A. (2012). Mutualism and evolutionary multiplayer games: Revisiting the Red King. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279(1747), 4611–4616. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., & Paiella, M. (2008). Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6), 1109–1150. doi:10.1162/jeea.2008.6.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, A. S. (2004). Psychology in organizations. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C. (2017). Dynamics of inequity. Book manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Bruner, J. P. (2017). Dynamics and diversity in epistemic communities. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2008). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., & O’Connor, C. (2017). Discrimination and collaboration in science. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholm, W. H., Dokumaci, E., & Franchetti, F. Dynamo. (2012). Diagrams for evolutionary game theory. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/whs/dynamo, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholm, W. H. (2010). Population games and evolutionary dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlag, K. H. (1998). Why imitate, and if so, how?: A boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits. Journal of Economic Theory, 78(1), 130–156. doi:10.1006/jeth.1997.2347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund, K., Hauert, C., & Nowak, M. A. (2001). Reward and punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(19), 10757–10762. doi:10.1073/pnas.161155698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41(7–8), 509–528. doi:10.1023/A:1018839203698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–102. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27–60). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weibull, J. W. (1997). Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). 2 biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 55–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P. H. (1993a). The evolution of conventions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 61, 57–84. doi:10.2307/2951778
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. H. (1993b). An evolutionary model of bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory, 59(1), 145–168. doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1009
   Google Scholar