References
- Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., & O’Connell, J. W. (1975). Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley. Science, 187(4175), 398–404.
- Bosquet, C., Combes, -P.-P., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2014). Gender and promotions: Evidence from academic economists in France. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. doi: doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12300
- Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2015). Women have substantial advantage in stem faculty hiring, except when competing against more-accomplished men. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1532.
- Coleman, J. S., et al. (1964). Introduction to mathematical sociology. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.
- De Paola, M., Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2015). Gender differences in attitudes towards competition: Evidence from the Italian scientific qualification (IZA Discussion Paper No. 8859). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2575039
- De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2015). Gender discrimination and evaluators gender: Evidence from Italian academia. Economica, 82(325), 162–188.
- Gleeson, J. P., Ward, J. A., O’Sullivan, K. P., & Lee, W. T. (2014). Competition-induced criticality in a model of meme popularity. Physical Review Letters, 112(4), 048701.
- Gvozdanović, J., & Maes, K. (2018). Implicit bias in academia: A challenge to the meritocratic principle and to women’s careers-and what to do about it. (Technical Report 23. Advice paper). League of European Research Universities (LERU).
- Haw, D., & Hogan, J. (2018). A dynamical systems model of unorganized segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 42(3), 113–127.
- Nielsen, M. W. (2015). Limits to meritocracy? gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 386–399.
- Poole, M., Bornholt, L., & Summers, F. (1997). An international study of the gendered nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations. Higher Education, 34(3), 373–396.
- Santiago R., Carvalho T., Vabø A. (2012) Personal Characteristics, Career Trajectories and Sense of Identity Among Male and Female Academics in Norway and Portugal. In: Vukasović M., Maassen P., Nerland M., Stensaker B., Pinheiro R., Vabø A. (eds) Effects of Higher Education Reforms. Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series, vol 4. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
- Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.
- She Figures. (2015). (EU Open Data Portal). https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/home
- Simon, H. A. (1952). A formal theory of interaction in social groups. American Sociological Review, 17(2), 202–211.
- Van der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349–12353.
- Volker, B., & Steenbeek, W. (2015). No evidence that gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands: A reaction to van der Lee and Ellemers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(51), E7036–E7037.
- Walton, P. H., & Walton, D. J. (2016). Simpsons paradox in the interpretation of leaky pipeline data. International Journal for Transformative Research, 3(2), 1–7.
- Zinovyeva, N., & Bagues, M. (2010). Does gender matter for academic promotion? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. (Fedea working paper No. 2010-15). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1618256