The mechanics of contentious politics: an agent-based modeling approach

References

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Achcar, G. (2013). The people want: A radical exploration of the Arab uprising. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auyero, J. (2007). Routine politics and violence in Argentina: The gray zone of state power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, J. M. (1999). From the streets to the internet: The cyber-diffusion of contention. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 132–143. doi:10.1177/000271629956600111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 784–811. doi:10.1177/000312240707200507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media, and international activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boutyline, A., & Vaisey, S. (2017). Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1371–1447. doi:10.1086/691274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockett, C. D. (2005). Political movements and violence in Central America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunori, P. (2017). The perception of inequality of opportunity in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth, 63(3), 464–491. doi:10.1111/roiw.12259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechel, B., Hellmann, T., & Stefan, K. (2015). Opinion dynamics and wisdom under conformity. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 52, 240–257. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2011). Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang, Y.-L., D’Orsogna, M. R., & Chou, T. (2017). A bistable belief dynamics model for radicalization within sectarian conflict.Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 75(1) (pp. 19-37).
   Google Scholar
• Cioffi-Revilla, C., & Rouleau, M. (2010). MASON RebeLand: An agent-based model of politics, environment, and insurgency. International Studies Review, 12(1), 31–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00911.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, T. P., Fry, H. M., Wilson, A. G., & Bishop, S. R. (2013). A mathematical model of the London riots and their policing. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1303. doi:10.1038/srep01303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2013). Clandestine political violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2016). Where did the revolution go?: Contentious politics and the quality of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, J. (2005). “Iruba: An agent-based model of the Guerrilla war process.” In Representing Social Reality, Pre-Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA) in Koblenz, Germany (pp. 198–205).
   Google Scholar
• Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior.
   Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P.A. David and M.W. Reder (Ed.) Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J.T. Mortimer and M.J. Shanahan (Ed.) Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19).New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent‐based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4(5), 41–60. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199905/06)4:5<41::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-F
   Google Scholar
• Fonoberova, M., Fonoberov, V. A., Mezic, I., Mezic, J., & Jeffrey Brantingham, P. (2012). Nonlinear dynamics of crime and violence in urban settings. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 15(1), 2. doi:10.18564/jasss.1921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15(3–4), 193–206. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C. K., Quek, H. Y., Tan, K. C., & Abbass, H. A. (2006). “Modeling civil violence: An evolutionary multi-agent, game theoretic approach.” In Evolutionary Computation, 2006. CEC 2006. IEEE Congress On in Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1624–1631). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. A. (2003). States, parties, and social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269. doi:10.2307/2787127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ketchley, N. (2017). Egypt in a time of revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-W., & Hanneman, R. (2011). A computational model of worker protest. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 14(3), 1. doi:10.18564/jasss.1770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, B. W., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, C., Lopes, R. J., & Coelho, H. (2014). An agent-based model of civil violence with imprisonment delay and legitimacy feedback. In Complex Systems (WCCS), 2014 Second World Conference On in Guimarães, Portugal (pp. 524–529). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Luders, J. E. (2010). The civil rights movement and the logic of social change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makowsky, M. D., & Rubin, J. (2013). An agent-based model of centralized institutions, social network technology, and revolution. PloS One, 8(11), e80380. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäs, M., & Flache, A. (2013). Differentiation without distancing. Explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence. PloS One, 8(11), e74516. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastroeni, L., Naldi, M., & Vellucci, P. (2019). Personal finance decisions with untruthful advisors: An agent-based model. ArXiv Preprint. ArXiv:1909.06759.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsutsuji, K., & Yamakage, S. (2019). The dual attitudinal dynamics of public opinion: An agent-based reformulation of LF Richardson’s war-moods model. Quality & Quantity, 53, 439–461.
   Google Scholar
• Moussaïd, M., Kämmer, J. E., Analytis, P. P., & Neth, H. (2013). Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PloS One, 8(11), e78433. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’brien, K. J., & Li, L. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. (2008). The relative income theory of consumption: A synthetic Keynes-Duesenberry-Friedman model. PERI Working Paper Series, no. 170.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, J. G. (2011). Homogeneous middles vs. heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘inverted‐U’: It’s all about the share of the rich. Development and Change, 42(1), 87–153. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century Britain. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Gregg Revivals.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. doi:10.1177/1088868311430825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, F. (2015). Economic inequality and nonviolent protest. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1314–1327. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soule, S. A. (2009). Contention and corporate social responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, D., & Sahimi, M. (2007). Can a few fanatics influence the opinion of a large segment of a society? The European Physical Journal B, 57(2), 147–152. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2007-00106-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. (1991). The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21(3), 367–388. doi:10.1177/004839319102100305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2004). Contention and democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2018, August). How social media took us from Tahrir Square to Donald Trump. MIT Technology Review.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. A. (2007). Patriots, politics, and the Oklahoma City bombing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar