Adaptation to Reversal of Retinal Feedback of Eyemovements

References

• Bossum, J., & Hamilton, C. R. Interocular transfer of prism-altered coordinations in split-brain monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963, 56, 769–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossum, J., & Held, R. Shifts in egocentric localization following prolonged displacement of the retinal image. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. G. Perception of depth with disoriented vision. British Journal of Psychology, 1928, 19, 117–146.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert, P. H. A study of the effect of inverted retinal stimulation upon spatiallycoordinated behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1930, 7, 177–363.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, J. P. An experimental investigation of the effect of prolonged inversion of the visual field in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1940, 56, 21–51.
   Google Scholar
• Held, R., & Hein, A. V. Adaptation of disarranged hand-eye coordination upon reafferent stimulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1958, 8, 87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Held, R., & Schlank, M. Adaptation to disarranged eye-hand-coordination upon the distance dimension. American Journal of Psychology, 1959, 72, 603–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmhollz, H. L. F. von. Handbuch der physiologishen Optik. Hamburg and Leipsig: Voss, 1856–1866.
   Google Scholar
• Helmholtz, H. L. F. von. Physiological optics, Rochester, New York: Optical Society of America, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, E. H. Space perception in the chick. Scientific American, 1956, 195(1), 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Holst, E. Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. British Journal of Animal Behavior, 1954, 2, 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, I. Experiments with prolonged optical distortion. Acta Psychologica, 1955, 11, 176–178.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., & Peterson, J. K. Does practice with inverting lenses make vision normal? Psychological Monographs, 1938, 50(5), 12–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, I., & Harris, C. S. Vision and touch. Scientific American, 1967, 216(5), 96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhule, W., & Smith, K. U. Effects of Inversion of the visual field on human motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 57, 338–346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siipola, E. M. Studies in mirror drawing. Psychological Monographs, 1936, 46(6), 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. U. The geometry of human motion and its neural foundations. I: Perceptual and motor adaptation to displaced vision. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 1961, 40, 71–87.a
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. U. The geometry of human motion and its neural foundations. II: Neurogeometric theory and its experimental basis. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 1961, 40, 109–129.b
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. U., & Greene, D. A critical period in maturation of performance with space-displaced vision. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 17, 627–639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, K. U., & Smith, W. M. Perception and motion: An analysis of space-structured motion. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, F. W., & Pronko, N. H. Vision with spatial inversion. Wichita, Kansas: Wichita University Press, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, F. W., & Snyder, C. W. Vision with spatial inversion: A follow-up study. Psychological Record, 1957, 17, 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sperry, R. W. Reestablishment of visuomotor coordinations by optic nerve regeneration. Anatomical Record, 1942, 84, 470.
   Google Scholar
• Sperry, R. W. Mechanisms of neural maturation. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951, Pp. 236–280.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, L. S. Functional polarization in retinal development and its reestablishment in regenerating retinae of rotated grafted eyes. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology Medicine, 1944, 57, 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, G. M. Some preliminary experiments in vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review, 1896, 3, 611–617.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, G. M. Vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review, 1897, 4, 341–360, 463–481.
   Google Scholar
• Wooster, M. Certain factors in the development of a new spatial coordination Psychological Monographs, 1923, 32(4, Whole No. 146).
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, J. C. Specificity vs. generality in learning and performing two large muscle motor tasks. Research Quarterly, 1961, 32, 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, I. McD., & Reynolds, J. B. Intercorrelations of nine tests of gross muscular coordination. Research Note Lab: 50-4 Project 21-09-006, Lackland AFB, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Drowatsky, J. N., & Zuccato, F. C. Interrelationships between selected measures of static and dynamic balance. Research Quarterly, 1967, 39, 509–510.
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E. A. The description and prediction of perceptual-motor skill learning. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training Research and Education, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen, H. Theory of mental tests. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, W. L. Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. Individual differences in intraindividual variability. Paper presented at the American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation Meeting, Las Vegas, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In R. C. Brown & G. S. Kenyon (Eds.) Classical Studies on Physical Activity, Englewood Cliffs, N. J: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Lotter, W. S. Interrelationships among reaction times and speeds of movement in different limbs. Research Quarterly, 1960, 31, 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, W. S. Specificity or generality of speed of systematically related movements. Research Quarterly, 1961, 32, 55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteniuk, R. G. A two-factor theory of the predictability of individual differences in unpredictability. Unpublished EdD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. Consistency of response as a function of selected motor variables. Research Quarterly, 1969, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar