Memory Drum Theory

References

• Bouisset, S., & Lestienne, F. The organization of a simple voluntary movement as analysed from its kinematic properties. Brain Research, 1974, 71, 451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S, & Slater-Hammel, A. T. Discrete movements in the horizontal plane as a function of their length and direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 84–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlton, L. G. Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 1981, 7, 1019–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, R. F., Clauser, C. E., McConville, J. T., Reynolds, H. M., & Young, J. M. Investigation of Inertial Properties of the Human Body (AMRL-TR-137) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research. Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, March 1975. (NTIS No. DOT H5-801 430).
   Google Scholar
• Christina, R. W., Fischman, M. G., Vercruyssen, M. J. P., & Anson, J. C. Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: Memory drum theory revisited. Journal of Motor Behavior, in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evarts, E. V. Brain mechanisms of movement. Scientific American, 1979, 241, 3, 164–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenberg, L. E., & Newell, K. M. Relative contribution of movement time, amplitude, and velocity of response initiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980, 6, 760–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross, D. J. Latency and response complexity. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1972, 4, 251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross, D. J. The latency of aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1976, 8, 27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, N. L., & Christina, R. W. Reaction time analysis of programmed control of short, rapid aiming movements. Research Quarterly, 1979, 50, 360–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R. An action potential study of neuromuscular relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 285–298.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. Independence of reaction and movement times and equivalence of sensory motivators of faster response. Research Quarterly, 1952, 23, 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. Stimulus complexity, movement capacity, age and sex in relations to reaction latency and speed in limb movements. Research Quarterly, 1961, 32, 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. The use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: A reply to Klapp, Wyatt, and Lingo. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1980, 12, 163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M. The evolution of the memory drum theory of neuromotor reaction. In G. A. Brooks (Ed.), Perspectives on the Academic Discipline of Physical Education. Champaign: Illinois, Human Kinetics Publishers, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 1960, 31, 448–458.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W. Behavioral analysis of movement. In V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Motor Control: Handbook of Physiology (Vol. 2). Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B. Task factors that influence selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975, 104, 147–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. Reaction time analysis of programmed control. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1977, 5 231–253.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. The memory drum theory after twenty years: Comments on Henry's note. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1980, 12, 169–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Erwin, C. T. Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976, 100, 368–374.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., & Greim, D. M. Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979, 5, 509–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., & Lingo, W. M. Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1974, 6, 263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagasse, P. P., & Hayes, K. C. Premotor and motor reaction time as a function of movement extent. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1973, 5, 25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, J. I., & Livesey, J. P. Task complexity, accuracy and reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1977, 9, 171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestienne, F., Polit, A., & Bizzi, E. From movement to posture. In C. H. Nadeau, W. R. Halliwell, K. M. Newell, & G. C. Roberts (Eds.), Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport-1979, Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Mendryk, S. Reaction time, movement time, and task specificity relationships at ages 12, 22, and 48 years. Research Quarterly, 1960, 31, 156–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. F. Effects of fatiguing isometric and isotonic exercise on resisted and unresisted reaction time components. European journal of Applied Physiology, 1977, 37, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrie, M. L. Practice effects on reaction latency for simple and complex movements. Research Quarterly, 1967, 38, 79–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrie, M. L. Effect of movement complexity on choice reaction and movement times. Research Quarterly, 1974, 45, 154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. T., Jr., Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & McFarquhar, R. Targetsize influences on reaction time with movement time controlled. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1980, 12, 239–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F. Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior. New York: North Holland Publishing Co., 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T., Jr., Motor output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 1979, 86, 415–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. M., & Bowen, K. F. The effects of delayed and displaced visual feedback on motor control. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1980, 12, 91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, R. B., & Milner-Brown, H. S. Contractile and electrical properties of normal and modified human motor units. In H. S. Stein (Ed.), Symposium on Control of Posture and Locomotion. Edmonton, Alberta, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L, & Wright C. E. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Stetson, R. H., & McDill, J. A. Mechanisms of the different types of movement. Psychological Monographs, 1923, 32, #3, (Whole Number 145); 18–40.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. R. T. Reaction time and large response movements. New Zealand journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1971, 4, 46–52.
   Google Scholar