The Schematic Representation of Effector Function Underlying Perceptual-Motor Skill

References

• Adams, J. A. Issues for a closed-loop theory of motor learning. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends. San Francisco: Academic Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Attneave, F. Transfer of experience with a class-schema to identification-learning of patterns and shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 81–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bainbridge, L. Mathematical equations or processing routines? In J. Rasmussen & W. B. Rouse (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failure. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzi, E., Dev, P., Morasso, P., & Polit, A. The effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1978, 41, 542–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzi, E., Polit, A., & Morasso, P. Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position, Journal of Neurophysiology, 1976, 39, 435–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, K. J. Movement, action and skill. In K. S. Holt (Ed.), Movement and child development. London: Heinemann for Spastics International Medical Publications, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, K. J. W. Theory of the human operator in control systems II: Man as an element in a control system. British Journal of Psychology, 1948, 38, 142–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. H. A brief statement of schema theory. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 8, 87–88.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning. London: Academic Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. Skill acquisition: An event approach with special reference to searching for the optimum of a function of several variables. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Head, H. Studies in neurology (Vol. II.). London: Oxford University Press, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Hebb, D. O. The organization of behaviour. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. E. The role of feedback in the development of a complex skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1977, 3, 224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huesman, L. R., & Cheng, C. M. A theory for the induction of mathematical functions. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 126–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagacinski, R. J., & Miller, R. A. Describing the human operator's internal model of a dynamic system. Human Factors, 1978, 20, 425–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, E. [Critique of pure reason], (N. Kemp Smith, trans.). London: Macmillan, 1963. (Originally published, 1781.).
   Google Scholar
• Kettey, C. R. Manual and automatic control. New York: Wiley, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1977, 3, 529–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & Norman, P. E. Motor schema formation in children. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, R., & Booth, B. Specific and varied practice of motor skill. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1978, 46, 395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, H. D., & Stelmach, G. E. A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning Journal of Motor Behavior, 1977, 9, 193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, D. S. A test of motor schema theory: Performance of a rapid movement task in the absence of knowledge of results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limitations on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956, 63, 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxley, S. E. Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1979, 11, 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M. Some issues on action plans. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M., & Barclay, C. R. Developing knowledge about action. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M., & Shapiro, D. C. Variability of practice and transfer of training: Some evidence toward a schema view of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1976, 8, 233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew, R. W. Human perceptual-motor performance. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. London: Halstead Press Division of John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Pew, R. W., & Baron, S. The components of an information processing theory of skilled performance based on an optimal control perspective. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Piagel, J. [The origins of intelligence in the child] (M. Cook, trans.). London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1953. (Originally published, 1936.).
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 83, 304–308.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 83, 304–308.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton, E. C. On prediction in skilled movement. Psychiological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 467–478.
   Google Scholar
• van Rossum, J. H. A. The schema notion in motor learning theory: Some persistent problems in research. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1980, 6, 269–279.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. Past and future issues in motor programming. Research Quarterly for Exer-cise and Sport, 1980 51, 122–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C. A preliminary attempt to determine the duration of a motor program. In D. M. Landers & R. W. Christina (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport (Vol. 1). Champaign, II.: Human Kinetics, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C. The learning of generalized motor programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California (Los Angeles), 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. C., Zernicke, R. F., Gregor, R. J., & Diestel, J. D. Evidence for generalized motor programs using gait pattern analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1981, 13, 33–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B., & Johannsen, G. Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Solley, C. M. Reduction of error with practice of perception of the postural vertical. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956, 52, 329–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sommerhoff, G. Logic of the living brain. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Veldhuyzen, W., & Stassen, H. G. The internal model: What does it mean in human control? In T. B. Sheridan & G. Johannsen (Eds.), Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. Space-time invariance in learned motor skills. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Welford, A. T. The psychological refractory period and timing of high speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 1952, 43, 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, H. T. A. Dimensions of control in motor learning. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Schmidt, R. A. A note on motor learning without post-response knowledge of results. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1975, 7, 221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N. Transfer in rapid timing tasks: An examination of the role of variability in practice. In D. M. Landers & R. W. Christina (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport (Vol. 1). Champaign, II.: Human Kinetics, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Ziebolz, H., & Paynter, H. M. Possibilities of a two-time scale computing system for control and simulation of dynamic systems. Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference. 1954, 9, 215–223.
   Google Scholar