References
- Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structures. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 98–123.
- Gopher, D. & Navon, D. (1980). How is performance limited: Testing the notion of central capacity. Acta Psychologica.
- Gopher, D., & North, R. A. (1977). Manipulating the conditions of training in time-sharing performance. Human Factors, 19, 585–593.
- Huddleston, H. F., & Wilson, R. V. (1971). An evaluation of the usefulness of four secondary tasks in assessing the effect of a lag in simulated aircraft dynamics. Ergonomics, 14, 371–380.
- McLeod, P. (1978). Does probe RT measure central processing demand? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 83–89.
- Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.
- Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources and dual-task performance. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Poulton, E. C. (1974). Tracking, skill and manual control. Academic Press.
- Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
- Vidulich, M., & Wickens, C. D. (December, 1981). Time-sharing manual control and memory search: The Joint effects of input and output modality competition priorities and control order. Technical Report EPL-81-4/ONR-81-4, Engineering-Psychology Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
- Wickens, C. D. & Gopher, D. (1977). Control theory measures as indices of attention allocation strategies. Human Factors, 19, 349–365.