10
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Binary Choice Reaction Time as a Function of the Relationship between Durations and Forms of Responses

Pages 392-404 | Received 30 Dec 1982, Published online: 13 Aug 2013

References

  • Falkenberg, L. E. & Newell, K. M. (1980). Relative contribution of movement time, amplitude, and velocity to response initiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 760–768.
  • Heuer, H. (1982a). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 35–47.
  • Heuer, H. (1982b). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 49–60.
  • Heuer, H. (1982c). Choice between finger movements of different and indentical form: The effect of relative signal frequency. Psychological Research, 1982c, 44, 323–342.
  • Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L, & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229–238.
  • Klapp, S. T. & Greim, D. M. (1979). Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 509–521.
  • Klapp, S. T. & Rodriguez, G. (1982). Programming time as a function of response duration: A replication of “dit-dah” without possible guessing artifacts. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 48–56.
  • Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P. & Lingo, W. M. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263–271.
  • Marteniuk R. G. & MacKenzie, C. L. (1980). A preliminary theory of two-hand co-ordinated control. In: G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Quinn, J. T., Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B. & McFarquhar, R. (1980). Targetsize influences on reaction time with movement time controlled. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 239–261.
  • Rosenbaum, D. A. & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.
  • Rosenbaum, D. A. & Saltzman, E. (1982). Levels of choice in the production of movement sequences. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Minneapolis.
  • Rosenbaum, D. A. & Saltzman, E. (1984). A motor-program editor. In: W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes. New York: Springer.
  • Schmidt, R. A. (1980). On the theoretical status of time in motor program representation. In: G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behavior. Amsterdam, NorthHolland.
  • Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S. & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motoroutput variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415–451.
  • Viviani, P. & Terzuolo, C. A. (1982). Trajectory determines movements dynamics. Neuroscience, 7, 431–437.
  • Zelaznik, H. N., Shapiro, D. C. & Carter, M. C. (1982). The specification of digit and duration motor programming: A new method of precueing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 57–68.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.