Effects of Practice Variability on Unimanual Arm Rotation

REFERENCES

• Adams, J.A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2, 111–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, R.B. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: A few questions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 288–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, H., & Schöllhorn, W.I. (2003). Differential Learning in shot put. In W.I. Schöllhorn, C. Bohn, J.M. Jäger, H. Schaper, & M. Alichmann (Eds.), European workshop on movement science (pp. 68–69). Köln, Germany: Sport&Buch Strauβ.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, H., Winkel, C., & Schöllhorn, W.I. (2008). Optimal range of variation in hockey technique training. Paper presented at the 2nd International Congress of Complex Systems in Sport, 10th European Workshop of Ecological Psychology, Madeira, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, F. (1998). A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50, 266–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christina, R.W., & Shea, J.B. (1988). The limitations of generalization based on restricted information. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudai, Y. (2004). The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 51–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etnyre, B.R., & Poindexter, H.B. (1995). Characteristics of motor performance, learning, warm-up decrement, and reminiscence during a balancing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 1027–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J. (1962). Reminiscence, drive and personality – revision and extension of a theory. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J. (1965). A three-factor theory of reminiscence. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 163–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J., & Frith, C.D. (1977). Reminiscence, motivation, and personality. London, England: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, T.D., Michelbrink, M., Beckmann, H., & Schöllhorn, W.I. (2008). A quantitative dynamical systems approach to differential learning: Self-organization principle and order parameter equations. Biological Cybernetics, 98, 19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, A.M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, E.R. (1952). The psychology of learning. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, P.W. (1975). Evidence for the generality of reminiscence as a function of extraversion and neuroticism. Journal of Psychology, 90, 41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C.I. (1951). Human learning and retention. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 613–689). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, C.L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Humpert, V. (2004). Vergleichende Analyse von Techniktrainingansätzen zum Tennisaufschlag [Comparative analysis of tennis serve training]. M. S. thesis. Münster, Germany: University of Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Humpert, V., & Schöllhorn, W.I. (2006). Vergleich von Techniktrainingansäntzen zum Tennisaufschlag [Comparison of tennis technique training]. In A. Ferrouti & H. Remmert (Eds.), Trainingswissenschaften im Freizeitsport – Symposium der dvs-Sektion Trainingswissenschaften vommm 7: 9 April 2005; Hamburg [Training sciences in recreational sports: symposium section training sciences VOMMM] (pp. 121–124). Hamburg, Germany: Bochum Czwalina.
   Google Scholar
• James, E.G. (2012). Fixed-point drift and hysteresis in frequency-scaled unimanual coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior, 44, 281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, E.G. (2014). Short-term differential training decreases postural sway. Gait & Posture, 39, 172–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimble, G.A. (1949). An experimental test of a two-factor theory of inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 15–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, T.D., & Genovese, E.D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T.D., Magill, R.A., & Weeks, D.J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintern, G. (1988). Distributed practice: are there useful insights for application or theory? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 298–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill, R.A. (1988). The many faces of practice distribution in motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 303–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K.M., Antoniou, A., & Carlton, L.G. (1988). Massed and distributed practice effects: Phenomena in search of a theory. Research Quarterly of Exercise and Sport, 59, 308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K.M. (2013). Changing up the routine: intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 41, 64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römer, J., Schöllhorn, W.I., & Jaitner, T. (2003). Differentielles lernen bei der Aufschlagannahme im Volleyball. In J. Krug & T. Müller (Eds.), Messplätze, Messtraining, Motorisches Lernen [Measuring stations, measuring station training, motor learning] (pp. 129–133). Sankt Augustin, Germany: Academia Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllhorn, W.I., Beckmann, H., & Davids, K. (2010). Exploiting system fluctuations. Differential training in physical prevention and rehabilitation programs for health and exercise. Medicina, 46, 365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllhorn, W.I., Beckmann, H., Michelbrink, M., Sechelmann, M., Trockel, M., & Davids, K. (2006). Does noise provide a basis for the unification of motor learning theories? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 37, 186–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllhorn, W.I., Mayer-Kress, G., Newell, K.M., & Michelbrink, M. (2009). Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. Human Movement Science, 28, 319–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllhorn, W., Michelbrink, M., Welminsiki, D., & Davids, K. (2009). Increasing stochastic perturbations enhances acquisition and learning of complex sport movements. In D. Araujo, H. Ripoll, & M. Raab (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition and action in sport (pp. 59–73). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D.C., Schmidt, R.A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J.A. S. Kelso & J.E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 113–150). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J.B., & Morgan, R.L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L.R., & Alvarez, P. (1995). Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, H., & Müller, E. (2008). The effects of differential and variable training on the quality of parameters of a handball throw. Sports Biomechanics, 7, 54–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E.L. (1958). Action decrement and its relation to learning. Psychological Review, 65, 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M.P., Brakefield, T., Seidman, J., Morgan, A., Hobson, J.A., & Stickgold, R. (2003). Sleep and the time course of motor skill learning. Learning & Memory, 10, 275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar