236
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLES

Withholding Response to Self-Face Is Faster Than to Other-Face

, , , &
Pages 117-123 | Received 09 May 2014, Accepted 27 Aug 2014, Published online: 30 Oct 2014

REFERENCES

  • Alderson, R. M., Rapport, M. D., & Kofler, M. J. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral inhibition: A meta-analytic review of the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 745–758.
  • Avila, C., & Parcet, M. A. (2001). Personality and inhibitory deficits in the stop-signal task: The mediating role of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 975–986.
  • Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Post-stop-signal slowing: Strategies dominate reflexes and implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 746–757.
  • Boehler, C. N., Hopf, J. M., Stoppel, C. M., & Krebs, R. M. (2012). Motivating inhibition-reward prospect speeds up response cancellation. Cognition, 125, 498–503.
  • Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). One's own face is hard to ignore. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 46–52.
  • Chen, C. Y., Muggleton, N. G., Juan, C. H., Tzeng, O. J., & Hung, D. L. (2008). Time pressure leads to inhibitory control deficits in impulsive violent offenders. Behavioural Brain Research, 187, 483–488.
  • Devue, C., & Brédart, S. (2011). The neural correlates of visual self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 40–51.
  • Dillon, D. G., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2007). Inhibition of action, thought, and emotion: A selective neurobiological review. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12, 99–114.
  • Franken, I. H., Muris, P., & Georgieva, I. (2006). Gray's model of personality and addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 399–403.
  • Gallup, G. G. J. (1982). Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology, 2, 237–248.
  • Gallup, G. G. J. (1998). Self-awareness and the evolution of social intelligence. Behavioral Processes, 42, 239–247.
  • Gallup, G. G. J. (1977). Self-recognition in primates: A comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. American Psychology, 32, 329–338.
  • Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Guan, L. L., Zhang, Q. L., Qi, M. M., Hou, Y., & Yang, J. (2012). Self-concept threat and comparison with important others weaken self-face advantage altogether. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 6, 010.
  • Kalanthroff, E., Cohen, N., & Henik, A. (2013). Stop feeling: Inhibition of emotional interference following stop-signal trials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 78.
  • Keenan, J. P., Gallup, G. G., & Falk, D. (2003). The face in the mirror: The search for the origins of consciousness. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Keenan, J. P., McCutcheon, B., Sanders, G., Freund, S., Gallup, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (1999). Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1421–1425.
  • Keyes, H., & Brady, N. (2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 840–847.
  • Kimbrel, N. A., Nelson-Gray, R. O., & Mitchell, J. T. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity and maternal style as predictors of psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1139–1149.
  • Li, C. S. R., Huang, C., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2006). Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task. Neuroimage, 32, 1918–1929.
  • Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.
  • Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 60–64.
  • Ma, Y. N., & Han, S. H. (2009). Self-face advantage is modulated by social threat: Boss effect on self-face recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1048–1051.
  • Ma, Y. N., & Han, S. H. (2010). Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 619–633.
  • Monterosso, J., Aron, A. R., Cordova, X., Xu, J., & London, E. D. (2005). Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79, 273–277.
  • Pannese, A., & Hirsch, J. (2010). Self-specific priming effect. Consciousness Cognition, 19, 962–968.
  • Pannese, A., & Hirsch, J. (2011). Self-face enhances processing of immediately preceding invisible faces. Neuropsychologia, 49, 564–573.
  • Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive function? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 160–166.
  • Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., Kenzer, A., & Bauer, A. (2012). Interactions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition. Emotion, 12, 192–197.
  • Platek, S. M., Thomson, J. W., & Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2004). Cross-modal self-recognition: The role of visual, auditory, and olfactory primes. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 197–210.
  • Sagaspe, P., Schwartz, S., Vuilleumier, P. (2011). Fear and stop: A role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals. Neuroimage, 55, 1825–1835.
  • Sui, J., & Han, S. (2007). Self-construal priming modulates neural substrates of self-awareness. Psychological Science, 18, 861–866.
  • Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). The boundaries of self face perception: Response time distributions, perceptual categories, and decision weighting. Visual Cognition, 21, 415–445.
  • Tacikowski, P., & Nowicka, A. (2010). Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 84, 318–324.
  • Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016–1035.
  • Verbruggen, F., & De Houwer, J. (2007). Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 391–403.
  • Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 418–424.
  • Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 647–661.
  • Yu, J., Hung, D. L., Tseng, P., Tzeng, O. J. L., Muggleton, N. G., & Juan, C. H. (2012). Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control. Cognition, 124, 251–255.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.