Two Routes to the Same Action: An Action Repetition Priming Study

REFERENCES

• Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaardt, R. (2001). How Bernstein conquered movement. Revisiting the work of Nikolai Aleksandrovitsch Bernstein. In M. L. Latash & V. M. Zatsiorsky (Eds.), Classics in movement science (pp. 59–84). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Cant, J. S., Westwood, D. A., Valyear, K. F., & Goodale, M. A. (2005). No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task. Neuropsychologia, 43, 216–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craighero, L., Bello, A., & Fadiga, L. (2002). Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia, 40, 492–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umilta, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1673–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, P., McAnsh, S., & Read, L. (2012). Repetition effects in grasping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 66, 1–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2013). Perseveration effects in reaching and grasping rely on motor priming and not perception. Experimental Brain Research, 226, 53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research PRPF, 73, 512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Muesseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1573–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. H. (2000a). Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport, 11, 729–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. H. (2000b). Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition, 74, 33–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latash, M. L. (1998). Progress in motor control: Bernstein's traditions in movement studies (Vol. 1). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Swanson, L. R., & Hall, A. L. (1991). What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Physical Therapy, 71, 150–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. C. (1991). Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randerath, J., Goldenberg, G., Spijkers, W., Li, Y., & Hermsdorfer, J. (2010). Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. Neuroimage, 53, 171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randerath, J., Li, Y., Goldenberg, G., & Hermsdorfer, J. (2009). Grasping tools: Effects of task and apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 47, 497–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randerath, J., Martin, K. R., & Frey, S. H. (2013). Are tool properties always processed automatically? The role of tool use context and task complexity. Cortex, 49, 1679–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Chapman, K. M., Weigelt, M., Weiss, D. J., & van der Wel, R. (2012). Cognition, action, and object manipulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 924–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen, M. (1990). Constraints for action selection - overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and Performance, 13, 321–342.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, D. E., & Lee, T. D. (2003). Schema theory: critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96, 133–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1993). Solving Bernstein's problem: A proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. Child Development, 64, 960–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D. G. (2005). Integration of posture and movement: Contributions of Sherrington, Hess, and Bernstein. Human Movement Science, 24, 621–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valyear, K. F., & Frey, S. H. (2014). Hand selection for object grasping is influenced by recent motor history. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 566–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigelt, M., & Schack, T. (2010). The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children. Experimental Psychology, 57, 476–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar